[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy is backwards

John Horton john.horton at legitscript.com
Wed Feb 14 19:26:07 UTC 2018


Yes, I respectfully disagree with Sara's statement, Chuck. (With a small
qualification.) I don't think you have consensus around that point, in my
view. The qualification I'd make is: where there are specific regulatory
reasons to either require or permit a change to existing Whois/RDS policy,
provided that it's done in the most conservative way possible, I think
that's reasonable to discuss. (The obvious example here is the GDPR.)
Beyond that, I believe that one of the best alternatives that's
(implicitly) presented so far is no change, as many (all?) of the proposed
changes I've heard so far would be worse than the status quo.

So do I believe it "must" change? No, aside from a very limited tweak due
to some specific regulatory issues. Do I believe it could be improved, and
that improvements are worth discussing? Yes.  But the answer to your
question is: Yes, there is someone on this working group who respectfully
disagrees with Sara's statement.

John Horton
President and CEO, LegitScript


*Follow LegitScript*: LinkedIn
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/legitscript-com>  |  Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/LegitScript>  |  Twitter
<https://twitter.com/legitscript>  |  *Blog <http://blog.legitscript.com/>*
  |  Newsletter <http://go.legitscript.com/Subscription-Management.html>




On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Chuck <consult at cgomes.com> wrote:

> Is there anyone in this WG who disagrees with Sara’s statement that ‘RDS
> must change’, understanding that we still have large differences of opinion
> regarding how to change it?
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
> *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Sara Bockey
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 14, 2018 9:22 AM
> *To:* Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com>; gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy
> is backwards
>
>
>
> I agree with Steve and look forward to additional feedback from him.
>
>
>
> RDS must change.  Discussions to the contrary are a waste of time.
>
>
>
> Sara
>
>
>
> *sara bockey*
>
> *sr. policy manager | **Go**Daddy™*
>
> *sbockey at godaddy.com <sbockey at godaddy.com>  480-366-3616
> <(480)%20366-3616>*
>
> *skype: sbockey*
>
>
>
> *This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by
> the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If
> you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender
> and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its
> attachments.*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Steve Crocker <steve at shinkuro.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, February 14, 2018 at 9:27 AM
> *To: *"gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Using the GDPR as a basis for RDS Policy is
> backwards
>
>
>
> I am only partially up to speed on the state of discussion within this WG,
> but I have been following the RDS situation for several years.  In my view,
> the current focus on GDPR, while understandable because of the looming
> deadline, is logically backwards.  The challenge, which we tried to address
> forcefully in 2012, is to rethink the RDS from the ground up.  In my view,
> this is:
>
>
>
> o necessary
>
>
>
> o feasible
>
>
>
> o will lead to a much cleaner model
>
>
>
> o will make it relatively straightforward to satisfy the GDPR and all
> similar regulations around the world.
>
>
>
> There are also some issues such as the relationship of name server
> operators that also need to be addressed.
>
>
>
> There is obviously much more that needs to be said.  I will contribute as
> much and as quickly as I can.
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180214/80e5356c/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list