[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] The message to the community (was Re: Cancellation of RDS PDP WG meetings at ICANN62)

[Rubens Kuhl]

> On 13 May 2018, at 21:54, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:00:29AM -0300, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>> 
>> Even saying so would require a consensus of the WG.
> 
> Nonsense.  The leadership can say whatever they want "in their
> judgement" about the WG.

That still doesn't constitute a WG position. It's basically their individual positions.


>  If that's not true, I don't understand what
> the meaning of the term "the leadership" is.

In GNSO practices, shepherding instead of ruling.

> 
> Still, I would like to propose something more radical: that the WG
> actually does produce such a rough consensus.

In GNSO lingo, consensus is what would be called rough consensus in IETF.


Rubens

> 
> A
> 
> 
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 529 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-wg/attachments/20180513/eca669bd/signature.asc>