From philip at brandregistrygroup.org Mon Mar 2 09:16:58 2015 From: philip at brandregistrygroup.org (BRG) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:16:58 +0100 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: In preparation for the meeting of 3 March, I attach some proposed edits to the preliminary Westlake report Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BRG comments on Westlake preliminary report of February 2015 on the GNSO review.doc Type: application/msword Size: 33792 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Mon Mar 2 14:57:40 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 14:57:40 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thank you Philip - much appreciated and very helpful to have in advance. I look forward to talking with you all tomorrow! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of BRG Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:17 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In preparation for the meeting of 3 March, I attach some proposed edits to the preliminary Westlake report Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Mon Mar 2 18:45:59 2015 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 13:45:59 -0500 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <54F4AFE7.60406@mail.utoronto.ca> I also attach some preliminary comments. I recognize that a lot of work has been done, and that the Westlake team had a hard time getting people to respond to their survey (folks are just too busy with IANA, I think), but I hope we have time to fix a few things here. Kind regards, Stephanie Perrin On 2015-03-02 9:57, Jen Wolfe wrote: > > Thank you Philip ? much appreciated and very helpful to have in > advance. I look forward to talking with you all tomorrow! > > Jen > > *jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB* > > Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm > > */513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348/* > > */IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014/* > > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > *From:* owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org > [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *BRG > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 4:17 AM > *To:* gnso-review-dt at icann.org > *Subject:* RE: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd > > In preparation for the meeting of 3 March, I attach some proposed > edits to the preliminary Westlake report > > Philip > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: PerrinComments on the Westlake Report.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 172022 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Mon Mar 2 18:56:31 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 18:56:31 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In-Reply-To: <54F4AFE7.60406@mail.utoronto.ca> References: <54F4AFE7.60406@mail.utoronto.ca> Message-ID: Thanks, Stephanie! These are very helpful comments and will look forward to the call tomorrow. jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM From: Stephanie Perrin [mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 1:46 PM To: Jen Wolfe; BRG; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd I also attach some preliminary comments. I recognize that a lot of work has been done, and that the Westlake team had a hard time getting people to respond to their survey (folks are just too busy with IANA, I think), but I hope we have time to fix a few things here. Kind regards, Stephanie Perrin On 2015-03-02 9:57, Jen Wolfe wrote: Thank you Philip - much appreciated and very helpful to have in advance. I look forward to talking with you all tomorrow! Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of BRG Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:17 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: RE: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In preparation for the meeting of 3 March, I attach some proposed edits to the preliminary Westlake report Philip -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mike at rodenbaugh.com Tue Mar 3 19:49:33 2015 From: mike at rodenbaugh.com (Mike Rodenbaugh) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:49:33 -0800 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Word version of Working Text Message-ID: On the wiki page, the 'export to Word' functionality is not working. Can someone please send around a Word version of the Working Text prior to the call in ten minutes? Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087 http://rodenbaugh.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Glen at icann.org Tue Mar 3 20:01:33 2015 From: Glen at icann.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Glen_de_Saint_G=E9ry?=) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:01:33 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] NCUC response to Wesrlake GNSO Review Message-ID: <2bfc8f9e1d554fa68106e8f18bc43dd0@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Submitted on behalf of the NCUC. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCUC Response to Westlake GNSO Review draft 03 March 2015..pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 182466 bytes Desc: NCUC Response to Westlake GNSO Review draft 03 March 2015..pdf URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Tue Mar 3 20:03:50 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:03:50 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] FW: Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <178d6337272448f2b0a09d924b242a1e@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Resending the dial in information, at Mike Rodenbaugh' request. Also, attached is the Working Text. Larisa From: owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nathalie Peregrine Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 6:21 AM To: ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [ntfy-gnso-review-dt] Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Review Working Party is scheduled for Tuesday, 03 March 2015 at 20:00 UTC for 1.5 hours. 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 20:00 London, 21:00 CET, +1 07:00 Sydney For other places: http://tinyurl.com/krslasg Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnso-review/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ The dial-in details are below - please let me know if you require a dial-out. Please confirm your dial-out requests to GNSO Secretariats gnso-secs at icann.org _________________________________________________________________________ Participant passcode: GNSO REVIEW For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. ____________________________________________________________________________ Dial in numbers:Please note new Toll numbers for Japan Country Toll Numbers Freephone/ Toll Free Number ARGENTINA 0800-777-0519 AUSTRALIA ADELAIDE: 61-8-8121-4842 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA BRISBANE: 61-7-3102-0944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA CANBERRA: 61-2-6100-1944 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA MELBOURNE: 61-3-9010-7713 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA PERTH: 61-8-9467-5223 1-800-657-260 AUSTRALIA SYDNEY: 61-2-8205-8129 1-800-657-260 AUSTRIA 43-1-92-81-113 0800-005-259 BELGIUM 32-2-400-9861 0800-3-8795 BRAZIL 55-11-3958-0779 0800-7610651 CHILE 1230-020-2863 CHINA CHINA A: 86-400-810-4789 10800-712-1670 CHINA CHINA B: 86-400-810-4789 10800-120-1670 COLOMBIA 01800-9-156474 CROATIA 080-08-06-309 CZECH REPUBLIC 420-2-25-98-56-64 800-700-177 DENMARK 45-7014-0284 8088-8324 ESTONIA 800-011-1093 FINLAND 358-9-5424-7162 0-800-9-14610 FRANCE LYON: 33-4-26-69-12-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE MARSEILLE: 33-4-86-06-00-85 080-511-1496 FRANCE PARIS: 33-1-70-70-60-72 080-511-1496 GERMANY 49-69-2222-20362 0800-664-4247 GREECE 30-80-1-100-0687 00800-12-7312 HONG KONG 852-3001-3863 800-962-856 HUNGARY 36-1-700-8856 06-800-12755 INDIA BANGALORE: 91-80-61275204 INDIA MUMBAI: 91-22-61501629 INDIA INDIA A: 000-800-852-1268 INDIA INDIA B: 000-800-001-6305 INDIA INDIA C: 1800-300-00491 INDONESIA 001-803-011-3982 IRELAND 353-1-246-7646 1800-992-368 ISRAEL 1-80-9216162 ITALY MILAN: 39-02-3600-6007 800-986-383 ITALY ROME: 39-06-8751-6018 800-986-383 ITALY TORINO: 39-011-510-0118 800-986-383 JAPAN OSAKA: 81-6-7878-2631 0066-33-132439 JAPAN TOKYO: 81-3-6868-2631 0066-33-132439 LATVIA 8000-3185 LUXEMBOURG 352-27-000-1364 8002-9246 MALAYSIA 1-800-81-3065 MEXICO GUADALAJARA (JAL): 52-33-3208-7310 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MEXICO CITY: 52-55-5062-9110 001-866-376-9696 MEXICO MONTERREY: 52-81-2482-0610 001-866-376-9696 NETHERLANDS 31-20-718-8588 0800-023-4378 NEW ZEALAND 64-9-970-4771 0800-447-722 NORWAY 47-21-590-062 800-15157 PANAMA 011-001-800-5072065 PERU 0800-53713 PHILIPPINES 63-2-858-3716 1800-111-42453 POLAND 00-800-1212572 PORTUGAL 8008-14052 ROMANIA 40-31-630-01-79 RUSSIA 8-10-8002-0144011 SAUDI ARABIA 800-8-110087 SINGAPORE 65-6883-9230 800-120-4663 SLOVAK REPUBLIC 421-2-322-422-25 0800-002066 SOUTH AFRICA 080-09-80414 SOUTH KOREA 82-2-6744-1083 00798-14800-7352 SPAIN 34-91-414-25-33 800-300-053 SWEDEN 46-8-566-19-348 0200-884-622 SWITZERLAND 41-44-580-6398 0800-120-032 TAIWAN 886-2-2795-7379 00801-137-797 THAILAND 001-800-1206-66056 TURKEY 00-800-151-0516 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES 8000-35702370 UNITED KINGDOM BIRMINGHAM: 44-121-210-9025 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM GLASGOW: 44-141-202-3225 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LEEDS: 44-113-301-2125 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM LONDON: 44-20-7108-6370 0808-238-6029 UNITED KINGDOM MANCHESTER: 44-161-601-1425 0808-238-6029 URUGUAY 000-413-598-3421 USA 1-517-345-9004 866-692-5726 VENEZUELA 0800-1-00-3702 Thank you, Terri Agnew -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 5634748 bytes Desc: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3.pdf URL: From stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca Tue Mar 3 19:44:31 2015 From: stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca (Stephanie Perrin) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:44:31 -0500 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Fwd: Reply Text In-Reply-To: <04972AC6-9944-4F6A-B005-B89646C4AF5A@uzh.ch> References: <04972AC6-9944-4F6A-B005-B89646C4AF5A@uzh.ch> Message-ID: <54F60F1F.9030104@mail.utoronto.ca> Please find attached a set of comments forwarded from NCUC. Bill Drake had sent them, but they have not appeared on the list so I presume they are caught up somewhere. Apologies for the delay. Kind regards, Stephanie Perrin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: NCUC Response to Westlake GNSO Review draft 03 March 2015.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 153008 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mike at rodenbaugh.com Tue Mar 3 20:48:26 2015 From: mike at rodenbaugh.com (Mike Rodenbaugh) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 12:48:26 -0800 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] FW: Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <178d6337272448f2b0a09d924b242a1e@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <178d6337272448f2b0a09d924b242a1e@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: Can we have the Working Text in a Word doc please? Not sure why the call-in info did not come through in the Gcal invites... Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087 http://rodenbaugh.com On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote: > Resending the dial in information, at Mike Rodenbaugh? request. Also, > attached is the Working Text. > > > > Larisa > > > > *From:* owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto: > owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Nathalie Peregrine > *Sent:* Monday, March 02, 2015 6:21 AM > *To:* ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org > *Subject:* [ntfy-gnso-review-dt] Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of > GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC > > > > Dear all, > > > > The next meeting of the *GNSO Review Working Party *is scheduled for *Tuesday, > 03 March** 2015 at **20:00 UTC for 1.5 hours.* > > > > 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 20:00 London, 21:00 CET, +1 07:00 Sydney > > For other places: *http://tinyurl.com/krslasg* > > > > > *Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: * > https://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnso-review/ > > > > > > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO > Master Calendar page: > http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ > > The dial-in details are below ? please let me know if you require a > dial-out. > > *Please confirm your dial-out requests to GNSO Secretariats* > > gnso-secs at icann.org > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Participant passcode: GNSO REVIEW > > For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > > > *Dial in numbers:Please note new Toll numbers for Japan* > > > > *Country* > > > > *Toll Numbers* > > > *Freephone/ Toll Free Number* > > ARGENTINA > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > AUSTRALIA > > ADELAIDE: > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > BRISBANE: > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > CANBERRA: > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > MELBOURNE: > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > PERTH: > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRALIA > > SYDNEY: > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > 1-800-657-260 > > AUSTRIA > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > 0800-005-259 > > BELGIUM > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > 0800-3-8795 > > BRAZIL > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > 0800-7610651 > > CHILE > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > CHINA > > CHINA A: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-712-1670 > > CHINA > > CHINA B: > > 86-400-810-4789 > > 10800-120-1670 > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > CROATIA > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > 800-700-177 > > DENMARK > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > 8088-8324 > > ESTONIA > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > FINLAND > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > 0-800-9-14610 > > FRANCE > > LYON: > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > MARSEILLE: > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > 080-511-1496 > > FRANCE > > PARIS: > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > 080-511-1496 > > GERMANY > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > 0800-664-4247 > > GREECE > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > 00800-12-7312 > > HONG KONG > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > 800-962-856 > > HUNGARY > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > 06-800-12755 > > INDIA > > BANGALORE: > > 91-80-61275204 > > INDIA > > MUMBAI: > > 91-22-61501629 > > INDIA > > INDIA A: > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > INDIA > > INDIA B: > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > INDIA > > INDIA C: > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > INDONESIA > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > IRELAND > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > 1800-992-368 > > ISRAEL > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > ITALY > > MILAN: > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > ROME: > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > 800-986-383 > > ITALY > > TORINO: > > 39-011-510-0118 > > 800-986-383 > > JAPAN > > OSAKA: > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > JAPAN > > TOKYO: > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > 0066-33-132439 > > LATVIA > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > 8002-9246 > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > MEXICO > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MEXICO CITY: > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > MEXICO > > MONTERREY: > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > 001-866-376-9696 > > NETHERLANDS > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > 0800-023-4378 > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > 0800-447-722 > > NORWAY > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > 800-15157 > > PANAMA > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > PERU > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > PHILIPPINES > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > 1800-111-42453 > > POLAND > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > ROMANIA > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > RUSSIA > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > SINGAPORE > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > 800-120-4663 > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > 0800-002066 > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > 00798-14800-7352 > > SPAIN > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > 800-300-053 > > SWEDEN > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > 0200-884-622 > > SWITZERLAND > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > 0800-120-032 > > TAIWAN > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > 00801-137-797 > > THAILAND > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > TURKEY > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > BIRMINGHAM: > > 44-121-210-9025 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > GLASGOW: > > 44-141-202-3225 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LEEDS: > > 44-113-301-2125 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > LONDON: > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > 0808-238-6029 > > UNITED KINGDOM > > MANCHESTER: > > 44-161-601-1425 > > 0808-238-6029 > > URUGUAY > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > USA > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > 866-692-5726 > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > > > > Thank you, > > > > Terri Agnew > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From onovoa at Antel.com.uy Tue Mar 3 20:50:13 2015 From: onovoa at Antel.com.uy (Novoa, Osvaldo) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 20:50:13 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] FW: Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC In-Reply-To: <178d6337272448f2b0a09d924b242a1e@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: ,<178d6337272448f2b0a09d924b242a1e@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <3383AB8D-CD8B-481C-9022-34ED64284497@Antel.com.uy> Sorry I couldn't participate in the call, I am traveling back home from Barcelona. I was supposed to travel yesterday evening. Best regards, Osvaldo Enviado desde mi iPhone > El 3/3/2015, a las 18:05, Larisa B. Gurnick escribi?: > > Resending the dial in information, at Mike Rodenbaugh? request. Also, attached is the Working Text. > > Larisa > > From: owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Nathalie Peregrine > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 6:21 AM > To: ntfy-gnso-review-dt at icann.org > Subject: [ntfy-gnso-review-dt] Reminder Meeting Invitation: meeting of GNSO Review Working Party Tuesday, 03 March at 20:00 UTC > > Dear all, > > The next meeting of the GNSO Review Working Party is scheduled for Tuesday, 03 March 2015 at 20:00 UTC for 1.5 hours. > > 12:00 PST, 15:00 EST, 20:00 London, 21:00 CET, +1 07:00 Sydney > For other places: http://tinyurl.com/krslasg > > Adobe Connect WITH AUDIO enabled: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/gnso-review/ > > > The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: > http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ > > The dial-in details are below ? please let me know if you require a dial-out. > Please confirm your dial-out requests to GNSO Secretariats > gnso-secs at icann.org > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Participant passcode: GNSO REVIEW > > For security reasons, the passcode will be required to join the call. > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > > > Dial in numbers:Please note new Toll numbers for Japan > > Country > > > > Toll Numbers > > Freephone/ > Toll Free Number > > > > > ARGENTINA > > > > > > > > > 0800-777-0519 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > ADELAIDE: > > > 61-8-8121-4842 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > BRISBANE: > > > 61-7-3102-0944 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > CANBERRA: > > > 61-2-6100-1944 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > MELBOURNE: > > > 61-3-9010-7713 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > PERTH: > > > 61-8-9467-5223 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRALIA > > > SYDNEY: > > > 61-2-8205-8129 > > > 1-800-657-260 > > > AUSTRIA > > > > > > 43-1-92-81-113 > > > 0800-005-259 > > > BELGIUM > > > > > > 32-2-400-9861 > > > 0800-3-8795 > > > BRAZIL > > > > > > 55-11-3958-0779 > > > 0800-7610651 > > > CHILE > > > > > > > > > 1230-020-2863 > > > CHINA > > > CHINA A: > > > 86-400-810-4789 > > > 10800-712-1670 > > > CHINA > > > CHINA B: > > > 86-400-810-4789 > > > 10800-120-1670 > > > COLOMBIA > > > > > > > > > 01800-9-156474 > > > CROATIA > > > > > > > > > 080-08-06-309 > > > CZECH REPUBLIC > > > > > > 420-2-25-98-56-64 > > > 800-700-177 > > > DENMARK > > > > > > 45-7014-0284 > > > 8088-8324 > > > ESTONIA > > > > > > > > > 800-011-1093 > > > FINLAND > > > > > > 358-9-5424-7162 > > > 0-800-9-14610 > > > FRANCE > > > LYON: > > > 33-4-26-69-12-85 > > > 080-511-1496 > > > FRANCE > > > MARSEILLE: > > > 33-4-86-06-00-85 > > > 080-511-1496 > > > FRANCE > > > PARIS: > > > 33-1-70-70-60-72 > > > 080-511-1496 > > > GERMANY > > > > > > 49-69-2222-20362 > > > 0800-664-4247 > > > GREECE > > > > > > 30-80-1-100-0687 > > > 00800-12-7312 > > > HONG KONG > > > > > > 852-3001-3863 > > > 800-962-856 > > > HUNGARY > > > > > > 36-1-700-8856 > > > 06-800-12755 > > > INDIA > > > BANGALORE: > > > 91-80-61275204 > > > INDIA > > > MUMBAI: > > > 91-22-61501629 > > > INDIA > > > INDIA A: > > > > > > 000-800-852-1268 > > > INDIA > > > INDIA B: > > > > > > 000-800-001-6305 > > > INDIA > > > INDIA C: > > > > > > 1800-300-00491 > > > INDONESIA > > > > > > > > > 001-803-011-3982 > > > IRELAND > > > > > > 353-1-246-7646 > > > 1800-992-368 > > > ISRAEL > > > > > > > > > 1-80-9216162 > > > ITALY > > > MILAN: > > > 39-02-3600-6007 > > > 800-986-383 > > > ITALY > > > ROME: > > > 39-06-8751-6018 > > > 800-986-383 > > > ITALY > > > TORINO: > > > 39-011-510-0118 > > > 800-986-383 > > > JAPAN > > > OSAKA: > > > 81-6-7878-2631 > > > 0066-33-132439 > > > JAPAN > > > TOKYO: > > > 81-3-6868-2631 > > > 0066-33-132439 > > > LATVIA > > > > > > > > > 8000-3185 > > > LUXEMBOURG > > > > > > 352-27-000-1364 > > > 8002-9246 > > > MALAYSIA > > > > > > > > > 1-800-81-3065 > > > MEXICO > > > GUADALAJARA (JAL): > > > 52-33-3208-7310 > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > > MEXICO > > > MEXICO CITY: > > > 52-55-5062-9110 > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > > MEXICO > > > MONTERREY: > > > 52-81-2482-0610 > > > 001-866-376-9696 > > > NETHERLANDS > > > > > > 31-20-718-8588 > > > 0800-023-4378 > > > NEW ZEALAND > > > > > > 64-9-970-4771 > > > 0800-447-722 > > > NORWAY > > > > > > 47-21-590-062 > > > 800-15157 > > > PANAMA > > > > > > > > > 011-001-800-5072065 > > > PERU > > > > > > > > > 0800-53713 > > > PHILIPPINES > > > > > > 63-2-858-3716 > > > 1800-111-42453 > > > POLAND > > > > > > > > > 00-800-1212572 > > > PORTUGAL > > > > > > > > > 8008-14052 > > > ROMANIA > > > > > > 40-31-630-01-79 > > > RUSSIA > > > > > > > > > 8-10-8002-0144011 > > > SAUDI ARABIA > > > > > > > > > 800-8-110087 > > > SINGAPORE > > > > > > 65-6883-9230 > > > 800-120-4663 > > > SLOVAK REPUBLIC > > > > > > 421-2-322-422-25 > > > 0800-002066 > > > SOUTH AFRICA > > > > > > > > > 080-09-80414 > > > SOUTH KOREA > > > > > > 82-2-6744-1083 > > > 00798-14800-7352 > > > SPAIN > > > > > > 34-91-414-25-33 > > > 800-300-053 > > > SWEDEN > > > > > > 46-8-566-19-348 > > > 0200-884-622 > > > SWITZERLAND > > > > > > 41-44-580-6398 > > > 0800-120-032 > > > TAIWAN > > > > > > 886-2-2795-7379 > > > 00801-137-797 > > > THAILAND > > > > > > > > > 001-800-1206-66056 > > > TURKEY > > > > > > > > > 00-800-151-0516 > > > UNITED ARAB EMIRATES > > > > > > > > > 8000-35702370 > > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > BIRMINGHAM: > > > 44-121-210-9025 > > > 0808-238-6029 > > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > GLASGOW: > > > 44-141-202-3225 > > > 0808-238-6029 > > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > LEEDS: > > > 44-113-301-2125 > > > 0808-238-6029 > > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > LONDON: > > > 44-20-7108-6370 > > > 0808-238-6029 > > > UNITED KINGDOM > > > MANCHESTER: > > > 44-161-601-1425 > > > 0808-238-6029 > > > URUGUAY > > > > > > > > > 000-413-598-3421 > > > USA > > > > > > 1-517-345-9004 > > > 866-692-5726 > > > VENEZUELA > > > > > > > > > 0800-1-00-3702 > > > > Thank you, > > Terri Agnew > ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. From svg at milathan.com Tue Mar 3 21:37:02 2015 From: svg at milathan.com (Stephane Van Gelder) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 22:37:02 +0100 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] NCUC response to Wesrlake GNSO Review In-Reply-To: <2bfc8f9e1d554fa68106e8f18bc43dd0@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <2bfc8f9e1d554fa68106e8f18bc43dd0@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: Thanks for passing this on. It makes interesting reading... Do we know if Westlake plan to respond to some of the comments in NCUC's document? Best, St?phane Van Gelder Milathan LTD "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" ---------------- Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com On 3 March 2015 at 21:01, Glen de Saint G?ry wrote: > Submitted on behalf of the NCUC. > > > > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > > > Glen > > > > Glen de Saint G?ry > > GNSO Secretariat > > gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org > > http://gnso.icann.org > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From charla.shambley at icann.org Tue Mar 3 22:53:41 2015 From: charla.shambley at icann.org (Charla Shambley) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 22:53:41 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Westlake Working Text and Providing Feedback Message-ID: <58df8faab3d9421299e4e3affd27ff5d@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Dear GNSO Review Working Party Members, Attached is the Word version of Westlake's Working Text. Please send comments referencing page number to the list at gnso-review-dt at icann.org. Alternatively, you may enter comments by Section directly on your wiki space: Provide Comments Here (you must be logged in to add comments). Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Charla Charla K. Shambley Strategic Initiatives Executive Assistant ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094 310-578-8921 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 817426 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5511 bytes Desc: not available URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Tue Mar 3 23:22:46 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:22:46 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] NCUC response to Wesrlake GNSO Review In-Reply-To: References: <2bfc8f9e1d554fa68106e8f18bc43dd0@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <784d0e28accf4914966e262907c06927@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> St?phane, As Richard Westlake indicated on today's call, their team welcomes all feedback. They will consider all comments and will provide a response indicating their disposition of comments, as well as their rationale. Please note that all comments will be added onto the GNSO Review Wiki, by working text section - available here. Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Stephane Van Gelder Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:37 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] NCUC response to Wesrlake GNSO Review Thanks for passing this on. It makes interesting reading... Do we know if Westlake plan to respond to some of the comments in NCUC's document? Best, St?phane Van Gelder Milathan LTD "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" ---------------- Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com On 3 March 2015 at 21:01, Glen de Saint G?ry > wrote: Submitted on behalf of the NCUC. Thank you. Kind regards, Glen Glen de Saint G?ry GNSO Secretariat gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org http://gnso.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From terri.agnew at icann.org Tue Mar 3 23:51:57 2015 From: terri.agnew at icann.org (Terri Agnew) Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 23:51:57 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] MP3 recording GNSO Review Working Party teleconference Tuesday, 03 March 2015 20:00UTC Message-ID: Dear All, Please find the MP3 recording of the GNSO Review Working Party teleconference held on GNSO Review Working Party teleconference Tuesday, 03 March 200UTC at http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-03mar15-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#mar The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/ Attendees: Jennifer Wolfe Ron Andruff David Maher Edward Morris Jennifer Standiford Klaus Stoll Amr Elsadr Robin Gross Rafik Dammak James Gannon Philip Sheppard Bill Drake Stephanie Perrin Mike Rodenbaugh Rudi Vansnick Tapani Tarvainen Sam Lanfranco Matthieu Camus Walid Al-Saqaf Ken Stubbs Laura Covington Guest speaker: Richard Westlake Apologies: Chuck Gomes Osvaldo Novoa ICANN Staff: Mary Wong Marika Konings Larisa Gurnick Charla Shambley Lars Hoffman Glen de St Gery Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew Adobe Chat transcript: Terri Agnew:Dear all, Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Party on the 03 March 2015 Philip:Hello Jennifer Wolfe:Hello, Philip, and hello everyone, thanks for joining! Amr Elsadr - Observer:Hi all. Just to note that the NCSG members listed as members of the WP on the right-hand column of the screen is outdated. Rudi Vansnick:sorry for being late Terri Agnew:Welcome Rudi Mary Wong:@Amr, thanks for the note Amr Elsadr - Observer:@Mary: I'm not a member anymore. Stephanie and Bill now are. Mary Wong:Can we confirm which groups (if any) the observers on this call are? We note several participants who are not current Working Party members representing the GNSO SG/Cs. James Gannon (Silent Observer):James Gannon NCUC/NCSG Amr Elsadr - Observer/NCSG:Done. Sorry. Mary Wong:Thanks! Mary Wong:They have been sent to the list Terri Agnew:Welcome Ron Andruff Ron A:Apologies for my late arrival! Greetings all, Terri Agnew:Welcome Tapani Tarvainen Tapani Tarvainen:Thanks, and also aorry for being late. (NCUC/NCSG) Marika Konings:For those that would like to update their information (to include affiliation, or observer status), please note you can do so by going to the drop down menu in the attendee pod and select 'edit my info'. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:Unfortunately the faulty methodology used in the study makes much of the study not very useful. Terri Agnew:Welcome Sam Lanfranco Klaus Stoll:I do not seem to have received the comments from NCUC Terri Agnew:@Philip, your mic is not active Mary Wong:@Klaus, that may be an issue of server response/speed, so different WP members may receive messages at different times. It was sent to the mailing list by Glen. Klaus Stoll:Thanks Mary Terri Agnew:Welcome Matthieu Camus Matthieu Camus:Thank you... sorry to be late Larisa Gurnick:Stephanie Perrin, Phillip Sheppard and NCUC comments have been recieved in response to the working text so far. Matthieu Camus:Matthieu Camus, Internet Society France Larisa Gurnick:Please send your comments to gnso-review-dt at icann.org Terri Agnew:Welcome Walid Al-Saqaf Richard Westlake:I'm sorry I can't reallly hear SP Richard Westlake:Bettee! Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:As an active participant for more than 11 years, I would have liked to have been interviewed by Westlake (I did fill out the survey). Marika Konings:@Stephanie - from my experience, we have actually come a long way since 5-6 years ago where indeed many WGs had many of the same people involved. We've seen quite a few new people step up, including yourself, which I personally think is a really positive development. Amr Elsadr - Observer/NCSG:I still need to get around to joining one. :) Terri Agnew:Welcome Ken Stubbs Marika Konings:@Amr - last time I checked you were on quite a few ;-) Bill Drake:I should add I talked to people who started and gave up Amr Elsadr - Observer/NCSG::) Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:who decided who got interviewed? Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:where can we see the terms of reference? Larisa Gurnick:Please see https://community.icann.org/display/GR2/Community+Engagement+Meetings for a listing of extensive outreach and engagement activities Bill Drake:I and a number of other chairs were only interviewed after I complained about it on the SOAC chairs list Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:I'd really like to know who decided who was interviewed? We need an answer to that question. Mary Wong:@Robin, the wiki page has the RFP: https://community.icann.org/x/aJLhAg Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):We tried o get a good respomse, we failed, it is what it is, is not an acceptable response. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:where to begin with all the inaccuracies? Larisa Gurnick:@Robin - the working party provided guidance to Westlake throughout the process re: interview candidates Stephanie Perrin:It is extremely difficult to stream through the document quickly when juggling the scree, the chat, and our own comments. Mary Wong:To follow up on Larisa's point, staff provided Westlake at their request with lists of officers, past chairs, WG veterans etc. Larisa Gurnick:@Stephanie - I emailed a copy of the working text several minutes ago Mary Wong:Staff did not select or screen the interviewees, just to be clear. Bill Drake:thanks Mary. But chairs turned out not to be worthy Ron A:Sorry I dropped right after I finished my intervention. Dialing back in... Marika Konings:@Bill - I believe all chairs were invited early on, but not everyone caught the email ;-) Bill Drake:Marika, most chairs said they were not Bill Drake:we had a discussion of it on the SOAC list Klaus Stoll:How do we avoid that perceived inaccuracies are in themself inaccurate Bill Drake:actually I was told the staff discouraged interviews Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:How did Westlake decide who to approach for interview? Bill Drake:Klaus, checking facts works Mary Wong:To clarify, by "chairs" the list included GNSO and WG chairs and vice-chairs as well as SG/C/SO/AC. Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):Even if the invitations were such that's snowballing methodology and just is not acceptable for drawing larger inferences in a bounded community like the GNSO. Klaus Stoll:Bill, how about some facts not just "I was told" Bill Drake:I totally oppose the use of "I was told" in such a report Bill Drake:particularly when highly selective Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:completely agree, Bill. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:The decision to negative stereotype NCUC is not appropriate. Marika Konings:@Mike - the Policy & Implementation WG is not reviewing the PDP, but has recommended a number of processes that may complement the existing PDP Mike Rodenbaugh:thx Marika, still there should be some mention in this doc? Marika Konings:I believe there are references to that effort in the text Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:how were the interviews divided - equally among all constituencies? I wasn't interviewed. Marika Konings:for example page 30 Mike Rodenbaugh:thx. Marika. Re interviews. only one IPC member was interviewed. Seems like at least 10 from NCUC were interviewed.. Mike Rodenbaugh:So we share Robin's question Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:sounds like questionable methodology, Mike, for making any recommendations. Bill Drake:I asked F2F in LA to be interviewed and was told no time Bill Drake:only after complaining on the SOAC chair list did I eventually get one Bill Drake:but this is a side issue Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:the other issue is the choice to selectively handle comments about NCUC. Terri Agnew:Laura Covington has joined audio Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:I'm (again) volunteering to be interviewed for this process. As a participant for more than 11 years, I can add something (ex-ncsg chair, ex-gnso-councilor, ex-ncuc chair). Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):I'll volunteer to give Westlake questions on statistical sampling. Apparently Richard missedcthat class at Oxford. Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):classes Larisa Gurnick:@Richard - please provide a list of people intervied. This will be included in the report - I understand. Mike Rodenbaugh:the list is already there in the Annexes Amr Elsadr - Observer/NCSG:These questions could all be avoided if a description of how informant selection could be included in the methodology description. Stephanie Perrin:THe list is there, who are they? What stakeholder groups? Mike Rodenbaugh:I agree that would be helpful Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:Debra Hughes was interviewed? She hasn't been in NCSG for several years. Where did her name come from to be interviewed? Philip:Quotes reflect concerns and praise. They are the essence of good consultancy Marika Konings:@Stephanie - I believe that is information that still needs completing (note the column 'role' which I presume will identify their affiliation) Larisa Gurnick:@Richard - can you please clarify what information you plan to include in the "Role" column? Stephanie Perrin:And when did they arrive at ICANN? This is important, if you are looking at attracting newcomers, and you are not actually talking to any Marika Konings:@Robin - she was one of the founders of NPOC which is one of the GNSO constituencies Philip:Section 8i about constituencies. They only exist in the CSG and NCSG Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:She left NCSG years ago. Where was the suggestion from to interview her (staff?) Marika Konings:@Robin - I believe there are other names that are no longer actively involved, but may provided some historic perspectives that were of interest to Westlake? Mary Wong:And to clarify/repeat - staff did not tell Westlake who to inteview and who not to. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:we should know WHO made the specific suggestions. rafik:@Marika better to explain the criteria that led to interviewes selection. for example I see many board members inclucded, looking to understand thw rationale Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:so Westlake selectively decided which comments to publish, thanks for the clarification, Richard. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:I also want to know if negative comments were made about other SG/Constituencies or only about NCUC in Westlake's effort. Marika Konings:@Rafik - that is a question for Richard/Westlake to answer, but as I understand it, it was a combination of suggestions that may have been received from staff, community members as well as aiming to get further input from those that responded to the 360 assessment. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:why are so many staff included as interviewees? that is not appropriate. I'd like to see the results with those comments deleted. rafik:@Marika and that is why I am looking for westlake answer :) Marika Konings:@Rafik - I only saw Ray as a board member on the list ? Stephanie Perrin:Bill Graham is a recent board member rafik:@marika including former too Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:Why didn't Westlake just go look at NCUC's webpage to see the diversity of its EC, etc? Why wasn't a pursuit for facts used (only perceptions)? Marika Konings:@Rafik - some of the former board members have served in other roles too, so their perspectives may have been of interest in relation to those other roles and not necessarily their former board position ;-) Mary Wong:Again, to follow up on Marika's point, the Board members listed as being interviewed are either past or present members of the SIC - so some of them would have been part of the prior restructuring exericise. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:The facts are readily available on the web. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:why not use facts. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:sounds like Westlake is relying on an entirely "subjective" determination. Why not also include objective facts? Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):Will Westlake please comment on the statistical validity of a survey of 27 people commenting on a group of 404 people? Ron A:As I understand it, any person in the community had the opportunity to bring their views forward regarding any part of ICANN GNSO... James Gannon (Silent Observer NCUC/NCSG):It seems on a blind read of the situation that there is major concern over the qualitiative and subjective bias of the review compred to a fact based quantative review.. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:It is a Fact that 27 different people have been on NCUC's EC for the last 10 years. It is a verifiable fact that the NCUC EC includes 1 rep from each geographic region. Not using these facts seems questionable. Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):I'll comment. The confidence interval of such a sample is 18.23% making the data completely useless. Philip:Comparing 27 to 404 in this context is completely useless. Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):Thanks Philip. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:why did westlake decide to ONLY go the subjective route? Larisa Gurnick:@Robin - Westlake methodology includes multiple data collection methods - quantitative and qualitative. Sam Lanfranco [NCSG-NPOC]:@Morris Technically, the C.I . is 18.23% if there is confidence in a sample being representative. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:Larisa, Richard just told us they decided to go the subjective route. Otherwise, what objective facts were relied upon? Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):@Sam. Good point. That number is the best case scenerio for the survey! Philip:A consultant's role is to report comments received. lets not dismiss this please Bill Drake:actually Philip I don't agree, the role is to do research Philip:Well maybe both Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):@Philip. Comments received - I agree. I'm having a problem with how they take faulty quant methodology, use that to select "representative" comments...I guess I'm questioning the 'representative' aspect. That's something we really don'y know due to some very poor esearch design and methodology. Stephanie Perrin:There is certainly an obligation to rely on facts and filter for bias. No evidence of how potential bias is filtered, in a fractious multi-stakeholder community where it is required. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:good point, Stephanie. How was "bias" accounted for by Westlake? Charla Shambley:You can view the 360 Assessment here: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/360-assessment-21aug14-en.pdf Stephanie Perrin:Thanks Charla, I have been through all that data. I can bring it to my university library and demonstrate the bias, but frankly I do not see that as my job. Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:what criteria does westlake use for its "professional selection" of what to provide? Philip:Between bias and truth is perception. Bill Drake:I understood the criteria to be what they think is relevant Robin Gross [observer-NCSG]:and what do they think is relevant? James Gannon (Silent Observer NCUC/NCSG):@robin those criteria will be extremely important for everyone to understand any subjective professional selection reccomendations by westlake Ron A:Do I understand this right: Westlake is expecting comments on this draft - or a new one coming out? Robin Gross:On what evidence did Westlake base its recommendation that additional constituencies will increase participation? Bill Drake:faith based Stephanie Perrin:Totally agree with Mike Robin Gross:who is driving this bus any way? Bill Drake:totally agree Mike James Gannon (Silent Observer NCUC/NCSG):+1 Mike Ron A:Agree - 20-30 days for community review and response. Robin Gross:The community should be making this determination. Not staff. Philip:Agree it is more important t get this right than to get this done. Robin Gross:Who is in charge? The community? Staff? Westlake? Philip:Us surely Bill Drake:surely Robin Gross:Then we set the dates. Robin Gross:And we decide when our report is ready for prime tme. James Gannon (Observer NCUC/NCSG):Surely the WG need to be given time to review before the public comment period of the full and complete report Philip:Agree Bill Drake:I'd like to comment on a complete draft before it goes out the door for public comment Robin Gross:Frankly, we are going to need another entirely new report given the issues with this one. Bill Drake:"Quality trumps timelines" is a good mantra Robin Gross:And not exactly "bottom up" Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):Agreed Robin. The survey is methodologically troubled it can not be fixed. Bill Drake:Yes Stephanie it would be good if it were understood why people volunteer their time Philip:Agree completely with SP Bill Drake:20 hours per week of pro bono to get abused is not really a good deal Robin Gross:Westlake works for us. We need to remember that. Ron A:@ Bill: you are referring to us, right?! ;o) Philip:In all ICANN hisory, this report on ICANN's policy development body is the most important. Bill Drake:Ron you got skin in the game! Laura Covington:agree with Stephanie and Mike R Edward Morris (observer/NCUC/GNSO Council):@Bill. Only 20? Robin Gross:Right, Phillip, this is enormously important. Why on earth rush it when the community is uncomfortable with methodology? Bill Drake:Civil society people are crazy to try to work here. We are treated better in the UN. Bill Drake:I mean that Robin Gross:Let's fix this and get it right. Bill Drake:Human Rights Council meeting now in Geneva. CS people really having productive engagement, and not being crapped on for their efforts. Stephanie Perrin:yes Philip:Bye all. A very productive meeting. New call with new drfat please. Robin Gross:The community has spoken on this, with a rare one voice. Terri Agnew:@Klaus, I see your mic is muted Robin Gross:I hope these errors can be fixed in the next draft. Stephanie Perrin:Thanks for chairing a difficult meeting!! Ron A:Thanks all! Bill Drake:thank you Jen, good chairing :-) James Gannon (Observer NCUC/NCSG):Thanks all. Rudi Vansnick:thanks Robin Gross:Thanks, all. Bye! Amr Elsadr - Observer/NCSG:Thanks all. Bye. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 5417 bytes Desc: not available URL: From william.drake at uzh.ch Wed Mar 4 09:16:25 2015 From: william.drake at uzh.ch (William Drake) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 10:16:25 +0100 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] NCUC response to Wesrlake GNSO Review In-Reply-To: References: <2bfc8f9e1d554fa68106e8f18bc43dd0@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: Hi Stephane I certainly hope so, as some unhappy readers are chomping at the bit to raise our concerns elsewhere and it?s getting harder to hold on. I?d rather we sort this out sotto voce here. Bill > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:37 PM, Stephane Van Gelder wrote: > > Thanks for passing this on. It makes interesting reading... Do we know if Westlake plan to respond to some of the comments in NCUC's document? > > Best, > > St?phane Van Gelder > > Milathan LTD > "Internet Intelligence - Strategic Advice" > ---------------- > Discover The Milathan Post on http://post.milathan.com > On 3 March 2015 at 21:01, Glen de Saint G?ry > wrote: > Submitted on behalf of the NCUC. > > > > Thank you. > > Kind regards, > > > > Glen > > > > Glen de Saint G?ry > > GNSO Secretariat > > gnso.secretariat at gnso.icann.org > http://gnso.icann.org > > > ********************************************************* William J. Drake International Fellow & Lecturer Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ University of Zurich, Switzerland Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, ICANN, www.ncuc.org william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists), www.williamdrake.org Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q ********************************************************* -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Thu Mar 12 14:48:06 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:48:06 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Message-ID: Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D05CA7.7B492770] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Revised GNSO Review Schedule 9 March 2015.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 121657 bytes Desc: Revised GNSO Review Schedule 9 March 2015.docx URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Thu Mar 12 17:24:55 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 17:24:55 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953A69E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Thanks Jen and Larisa and Westlake. This seems very responsive in my opinion to the concerns that were communicated on the Working Call that I just listened. I have one question: Is it okay if I share the timeline below with the RySG; questions were asked about the timeline on the RySG call yesterday. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry (Glen at icann.org) Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D05CC7.FC5E7340] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Thu Mar 12 18:09:05 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 18:09:05 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline In-Reply-To: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953A69E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953A69E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: <44f880a66905438381f33e70bf407b58@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Chuck, Please feel free to share the extended timeline and related details - for your convenience, the information is posted on the home page of the GNSO Review community wiki. The detailed timeline is also available in the wiki, where progress is tracked. Best, Larisa From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:25 AM To: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Thanks Jen and Larisa and Westlake. This seems very responsive in my opinion to the concerns that were communicated on the Working Call that I just listened. I have one question: Is it okay if I share the timeline below with the RySG; questions were asked about the timeline on the RySG call yesterday. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry (Glen at icann.org) Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D05CB4.F35D6FC0] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Thu Mar 12 22:24:10 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:24:10 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline In-Reply-To: <44f880a66905438381f33e70bf407b58@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953A69E@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <44f880a66905438381f33e70bf407b58@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953ACE8@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Thanks Larisa. Chuck From: Larisa B. Gurnick [mailto:larisa.gurnick at icann.org] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:09 PM To: Gomes, Chuck; Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Chuck, Please feel free to share the extended timeline and related details - for your convenience, the information is posted on the home page of the GNSO Review community wiki. The detailed timeline is also available in the wiki, where progress is tracked. Best, Larisa From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:25 AM To: Jen Wolfe; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Thanks Jen and Larisa and Westlake. This seems very responsive in my opinion to the concerns that were communicated on the Working Call that I just listened. I have one question: Is it okay if I share the timeline below with the RySG; questions were asked about the timeline on the RySG call yesterday. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry (Glen at icann.org) Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D05CF1.C9D50900] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Sat Mar 14 00:11:24 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:11:24 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953C6DE@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Wow! It was a very time consuming task going through this. Here is a completion of my review, edits and comments that I started a few weeks ago. Note that this version includes both my previous input and my new input starting on page 6 with Section VI of the report. You will see that I inserted a total of 58 comments plus several edits that are highlighted. In an effort to be responsive to Jen's suggestion of tracking by category, I used the color scheme shown below in her message. I confess to not yet having had time to read the feedback given by others, so my input was made without that. I will try to review everyone else's input in the next several days. I apologize to Westlake for being a little blunt in a few cases. At the same time I want to thank you for the extensive work you have put into this and for what you will do to bring it to conclusion. Thanks for listening to all of us. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:05 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Preparation for Meeting on March 3rd I hope everyone had safe travels back from Singapore! I am looking forward to our next meeting on Tuesday, March 3rd. You should have received an updated calendar invite. In preparation for the meeting, I'd like to encourage you track your comments about the report in one of three categories to help us organize and guide our discussion: 1. Factual Inaccuracies. Anything you believe is factually inaccurate can be reported back to Westlake. 2. Concerns about any quotes or information cited in the report which could be accurate, but may create problems or raises concerns in the community. 3. Concerns about conclusions reached that you would like to bring to Westlake's attention. [Chuck Gomes] 4. Other We will plan to go through each section of the report asking for comments in these three categories. You will still have time after this call to provide additional comments on the Wiki or to send to me or staff and we will compile all feedback in writing for the Westlake team. Our goal in this call is to ensure that we capture all comments regarding the report so that we can aggregate feedback in an organized and meaningful way. Westlake will be on the call and available to answer questions or provide clarification. If we think an additional call is needed, we can schedule further time by phone to discuss the report and feedback. I appreciate your time and input into this process and look forward to our call on Tuesday. In the meantime, if you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to reply to the list or post on the Wiki. With kindest regards, Jen jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3 (2) with Gomes input part 2.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 6377987 bytes Desc: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3 (2) with Gomes input part 2.docx URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Sun Mar 15 16:54:11 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:54:11 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4953E712@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Jen/Larisa, What is intended with the SIC update in late April? I would suggest sending out meeting requests as soon as possible for 4 May and 12 May so that all of us can try to keep the times free if possible. If we later need to change or delete them, we can deal with that at that time. Considering the number of comments that were submitted on the working text, the large amount of new text that will be added as noted in the working text and the overall size of the document, I think a three week turn-around time for Working Party input on v.0 may be challenging but we can try. It will likely depend on what other time sensitive items all of us have at the time. We can try but we should be prepared to extend if needed. Regarding the public comment period in June, we should be thinking of ways that we can facilitate public comments. Because of the size of the document, the significance it will have on various community interests and the fact that the period will likely coincide with critical efforts of the CWG IANA and CCWG Accountability, we going to need to make it as easy as possible to people to review and respond to recommendations in the report. The GNSO Council Update at ICANN 53 is of course a must, but I think an update to the Council should be given before the public comment period as well so that the Council can do what it can to encourage comments. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jen Wolfe Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry (Glen at icann.org) Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D05F1D.39E53F80] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Tue Mar 17 18:46:40 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:46:40 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Message-ID: Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on Westlake's Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March. Please refer to Jen Wolfe's email below for updates on the timeline. There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: ? Post your comments on the wiki (comments are organized by section of the working text) ? Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) ? Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document. Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki, listen to the recording from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript from that meeting. Thank you, Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D060A3.132E6DD0] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 817608 bytes Desc: Working Text for WP and staff - 9 Feb v3.docx URL: From cgomes at Verisign.com Tue Mar 17 21:28:29 2015 From: cgomes at Verisign.com (Gomes, Chuck) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:28:29 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4954182C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Thanks Larisa. I assume that the wiki is not up to date because I do not see any of my input. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:47 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on Westlake's Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March. Please refer to Jen Wolfe's email below for updates on the timeline. There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: ? Post your comments on the wiki (comments are organized by section of the working text) ? Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) ? Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document. Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki, listen to the recording from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript from that meeting. Thank you, Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D060D7.DAB53C10] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From larisa.gurnick at icann.org Tue Mar 17 21:49:03 2015 From: larisa.gurnick at icann.org (Larisa B. Gurnick) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 21:49:03 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] RE: Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March In-Reply-To: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4954182C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> References: <6DCFB66DEEF3CF4D98FA55BCC43F152E4954182C@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> Message-ID: <20cc3724a7944428b089d1fd584385d9@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG> Chuck, Your comments as a whole have been posted on the wiki. It will take staff more time to transfer all your comments into the relevant sections on the wiki - this work is in process. Thank you, Larisa From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:28 PM To: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: RE: Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Thanks Larisa. I assume that the wiki is not up to date because I do not see any of my input. Chuck From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 2:47 PM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on Westlake's Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March. Please refer to Jen Wolfe's email below for updates on the timeline. There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: ? Post your comments on the wiki (comments are organized by section of the working text) ? Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) ? Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document. Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki, listen to the recording from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript from that meeting. Thank you, Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D060BF.5AB425C0] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: From RA at ONRconsulting.com Fri Mar 20 16:13:59 2015 From: RA at ONRconsulting.com (Ron Andruff) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 12:13:59 -0400 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <04b101d06328$e077e5a0$a167b0e0$@ONRconsulting.com> Dear all, First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate. I believe that Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement. Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck?s comments on the draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following: 1. From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG membership lists are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make membership information publicly available: ? The RrSG and RySG ? IPC ? ISCPC and BC The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right above our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/ 2. That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each GNSO PDP WG as a means of providing timely non-binding input. Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members to join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one nation can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation. Hence, even if there was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending liaisons (and there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no current mechanism to effect what Westlake is suggesting. Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck?s contributions and recommend that they be carefully considered vis-?-vis incorporating the corrections/clarifications in the final draft. Thank you. Kind regards, RA PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: DELETE randruff at rnapartners.com ; REPLACE WITH: RA at ONRconsulting.com Ron Andruff ONR Consulting, Inc. www.ICANNSherpa.com (+1) 917 770-2693 From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47 To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on Westlake?s Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March. Please refer to Jen Wolfe?s email below for updates on the timeline. There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: * Post your comments on the wiki (comments are organized by section of the working text) * Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org ) * Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document. Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org ) You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki , listen to the recording from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript from that meeting. Thank you, Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com ); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mike at rodenbaugh.com Mon Mar 23 23:28:44 2015 From: mike at rodenbaugh.com (Mike Rodenbaugh) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:28:44 -0700 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March In-Reply-To: <04b101d06328$e077e5a0$a167b0e0$@ONRconsulting.com> References: <04b101d06328$e077e5a0$a167b0e0$@ONRconsulting.com> Message-ID: With apologies for the slight delay over the weekend, the IPC's initial comments on the Working Text are attached. Please let me know any questions. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087 http://rodenbaugh.com On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ron Andruff wrote: > Dear all, > > > > First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this > discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate. I believe that > Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement. > > > > Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck?s comments > on the draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following: > > > > *1. **From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG > membership lists are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make > membership information publicly available: * > > *? The RrSG and RySG ? IPC ? ISCPC and BC* > > > > The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right > above our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/ > > > > *2. **That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement > continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work > it should consider how the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each > GNSO PDP WG as a means of providing timely non-binding input.* > > > > Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members > to join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing > liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one > nation can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation. Hence, even > if there was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending > liaisons (and there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no > current mechanism to effect what Westlake is suggesting. > > > > Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck?s contributions and > recommend that they be carefully considered vis-?-vis incorporating the > corrections/clarifications in the final draft. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > RA > > > > > > *PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS*: DELETE randruff at rnapartners.com; *REPLACE > WITH: RA at ONRconsulting.com * > > > > *Ron Andruff* > > *ONR Consulting, Inc.* > > *www.ICANNSherpa.com * > > *(+1) 917 770-2693 <%28%2B1%29%20917%20770-2693>* > > > > *From:* owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto: > owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Larisa B. Gurnick > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47 > *To:* gnso-review-dt at icann.org > *Subject:* [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March > > > > Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, > > Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on > Westlake?s Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your > comments yet, please do so by the deadline of *20 March*. Please refer > to Jen Wolfe?s email below for updates on the timeline. > > > > There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: > > ? Post your comments on the wiki > (comments are organized by section > of the working text) > > ? Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) > > ? Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the > attached document. Please send your email to the list ( > gnso-review-dt at icann.org) > > > > You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki > , listen to the recording > from the 3 March > working session, or read the transcript > > from that meeting. > > > > Thank you, > > Larisa > > > > *Larisa B. Gurnick* > > Director, Strategic Initiatives > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > larisa.gurnick at icann.org > > 310 383-8995 > > > > > > > > > > *From:* Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com ] > > *Sent:* Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM > *To:* gnso-review-dt at icann.org > *Cc:* Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); > Glen de Saint G?ry > *Subject:* Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline > > > > Dear GNSO Review Working Party, > > > > Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide > initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in > reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! > > > > To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and > Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word > document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a > graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. > > > > *Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March > 20th*, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising > their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All > comments will be provided to Westlake. > > > > When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to > be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they *do not* > take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as > Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent > calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached > timeline and schedule. > > > > I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to > gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to > continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a > Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB* > > Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm > > *513.746.2800 x 1 <513.746.2800%20x%201> or Cell 513.238.4348 > <513.238.4348>* > > *IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014* > > What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P > > Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc > > Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP > > Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: IPC Comments on Working Text from Westlake Group.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 16590 bytes Desc: not available URL: From jwolfe at wolfedomain.com Tue Mar 24 12:45:44 2015 From: jwolfe at wolfedomain.com (Jen Wolfe) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:45:44 +0000 Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March In-Reply-To: References: <04b101d06328$e077e5a0$a167b0e0$@ONRconsulting.com> Message-ID: Thanks Mike, we will make sure these are incorporated. jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:29 PM To: Ron Andruff Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March With apologies for the slight delay over the weekend, the IPC's initial comments on the Working Text are attached. Please let me know any questions. Thanks, Mike Mike Rodenbaugh RODENBAUGH LAW tel/fax: +1.415.738.8087 http://rodenbaugh.com On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Ron Andruff > wrote: Dear all, First, please allow me to express my apologies for dropping off of this discussion group pre-Singapore due to too much on my plate. I believe that Steve Coates and perhaps one other BC member have joined in replacement. Notwithstanding stepping back, I was just going through Chuck?s comments on the draft working text and wanted to also weigh-in on the following: 1. From our research, we understand the NCUC, NPOC and NCSG membership lists are publicly available. The following SGs/Cs do not make membership information publicly available: ? The RrSG and RySG ? IPC ? ISCPC and BC The BC membership list is the first thing noted on our web site, right above our Charter: http://www.bizconst.org/members/ 2. That the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on Early Engagement continue its two work streams as priority projects. As a part of its work it should consider how the GAC could appoint a liaison (non-voting) to each GNSO PDP WG as a means of providing timely non-binding input. Having been actively engaged in discussions for one (or more) GAC members to join the Nominating Committee, the issues govenrments face in providing liaisons to the Nom Com, working groups or other bodies is that no one nation can speak or act on behalf of another sovereign nation. Hence, even if there was a significant number of GAC members in agreement with sending liaisons (and there is no evidence of that as far as I see) there is no current mechanism to effect what Westlake is suggesting. Otherwise, I am generally supportive of Chuck?s contributions and recommend that they be carefully considered vis-?-vis incorporating the corrections/clarifications in the final draft. Thank you. Kind regards, RA PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS: DELETE randruff at rnapartners.com; REPLACE WITH: RA at ONRconsulting.com Ron Andruff ONR Consulting, Inc. www.ICANNSherpa.com (+1) 917 770-2693 From: owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-review-dt at icann.org] On Behalf Of Larisa B. Gurnick Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 14:47 To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Subject: [gnso-review-dt] Comments on Westlake Working Text Due 20 March Dear members of the GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you for taking the time to provide your comments and feedback on Westlake?s Working Text. If you have not had a chance to provide your comments yet, please do so by the deadline of 20 March. Please refer to Jen Wolfe?s email below for updates on the timeline. There are several options for your convenience to send your comments: ? Post your comments on the wiki (comments are organized by section of the working text) ? Email your comments to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) ? Email your comments via redline edits or notes within the attached document. Please send your email to the list (gnso-review-dt at icann.org) You can view written comments provided so far on the wiki, listen to the recording from the 3 March working session, or read the transcript from that meeting. Thank you, Larisa Larisa B. Gurnick Director, Strategic Initiatives Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) larisa.gurnick at icann.org 310 383-8995 From: Jen Wolfe [mailto:jwolfe at wolfedomain.com] Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 7:48 AM To: gnso-review-dt at icann.org Cc: Larisa B. Gurnick; Jonathan Robinson (jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com); Glen de Saint G?ry Subject: Updated on GNSO Review Working Party Timeline Dear GNSO Review Working Party, Thank you to everyone for your active participation in our call to provide initial feedback to the Westlake team last week. You diligence in reviewing the report and providing feedback is greatly appreciated! To address concerns regarding the timeline, we have worked with Staff and Westlake to adjust the timeframe for next steps. I have attached a Word document which details the adjusted time frame and also dropped in below a graphic showing the timeline modified to respond to community concerns. Please continue to provide redlines, letters or responses through March 20th, so that Westlake can take this into consideration when revising their report. You can send this through the list or post on the wiki. All comments will be provided to Westlake. When delivering the next version of the report, we have asked Westlake to be clear in stating its rationale for any comments which they do not take incorporate into their report. The next version will be provided as Draft 0 and circulated on April 24th. Please note dates for subsequent calls and meetings to respond to Draft 0 are included on the attached timeline and schedule. I hope you will agree this is helpful in providing additional time to gather and provide feedback in a meaningful way. I look forward to continuing to work with you and welcome your feedback. I wish you all a Happy Spring and look forward to talking again in May! [cid:image001.jpg at 01D0660E.E9582E30] jennifer c. WOLFE, esq., apr, SSBB Founder & President, wolfe domain, a digital brand strategy advisory firm 513.746.2800 x 1 or Cell 513.238.4348 IAM 300 - TOp 300 global ip strategists 2011-2014 What will you do with your Dot Brand? : http://ow.ly/Ebl8P Subscribe to Our You Tube Channel on Brand gTLDs http://ow.ly/Eblgc Jen Wolfe gTLD Click Z Column http://ow.ly/EbljP Linked In Group: gTLD Strategy for Brands http://ow.ly/EbloM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 48876 bytes Desc: image001.jpg URL: