[Gnso-rpm-data] Results re: REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call)

Wed Dec 13 16:15:20 UTC 2017

Hi Kurt and RPM WG members,

Many thanks to you and everyone who responded to our request for feedback on the timing of the next call!  Per the responses there was a slight preference for holding the call at 1700 UTC.

Also, per the responses thus far as to whether to hold a call on 22 December, at least one member may be traveling and a few others noted that while they could make it, it might be better to cancel.

Kind regards,

Julie, Mary, Berry, and Ariel

From: Kurt Pritz <kurt at kjpritz.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 7:57 PM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Cc: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink at amazon.com>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data at icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call)

1730 is fine for me. Earlier is generally not as good. Later is better.  

Kurt

On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:

Hello again everyone,

We’d like to confirm the time for the Data Sub Team call this Friday (15 December) – can we go ahead to confirm if it should be at 1730 UTC or some other time (e.g. 1700 UTC (earlier) or 1900 UTC (later))? We understand that earlier and later times present difficulties for J. Scott and Susan, respectively, and therefore will appreciate your guidance.

Thank you!

Cheers

Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry

From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-data" <gnso-rpm-data at icann.org>
Reply-To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink at amazon.com>
Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 15:56
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call

Hi everyone,

As I indicated in the original Doodle poll, I do have a conflict at 1800 on Fridays.  I can sometimes miss it (like today) as I do want to accommodate others, especially Europe, but I’d prefer if 17:30 were not our “new normal.” I have doubts about my ability to make a call on Dec 22.  I may be taking that day off.

^ I realize this is not very definitive and I’m sorry.

Best,

Kristine

From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 11:18 AM
To: gnso-rpm-data at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call

Dear all,

Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions:

Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)?  Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome.
Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel?

Thank you very much for your guidance.

Kind regards,

Julie

From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-data at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call

Dear all, 

Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December):

Action Items:

-- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below.

-- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December.

Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing[docs.google.com]), Charter question #2:

Page 14:

-- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?"

Page 15:

-- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?"

-- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was."

-- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet.

The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records.

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rpm-data mailing list
Gnso-rpm-data at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-data

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-data/attachments/20171213/bdf0f3d4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-data/attachments/20171213/bdf0f3d4/smime-0001.p7s>