[Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 26 January 2018 RPM Data Sub Team Call

[Julie Hedlund]

All, 

 

Below are the action items and notes staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (26 January 2018).  The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records.

 

Note also that the next call will be on Friday, 02 February at 1700 UTC.

 

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

Action Items:  

 
Section 2, Survey of Registrars: Staff will update the Google document based on the discussion on the call on 26 January.
Section 3, Survey of TM and Brand Owners: Sub Team members should review and comment on the list concerning the final anecdotal and data questions for the question “What is the evidence of harm under the existing [exact match] system?”, page 22-23 at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing. 
 

Notes:

 

1. Section 2, Registrars, Page 14, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing

 

Anecdotal Questions: If you offer(ed) pre-order for new gTLD domain names before the launch of GA, when was the Claims Notice submitted to the customer?

-- Move to data questions.

 

What, if any, challenges do you encounter when sending Claims Notices in respect of pre-order names.

Were there any particular TLDs or types of TLDs where the operation of the Claims was technically or operationally difficult, or where Claims was otherwise problematic or unnecessary?  Please explain.  

-- Variation: "What aspects of the Claims RPMs conflicted with your domain names sales/operations?"   and/or "Is the way the claims period described in the RPM too prescriptive?"

-- Edit to first bullet, "in respect of pre-order names or other operations?"

 

Given the registration process that you operate, would it be feasible for you, to run surveys...

-- Add “and/or your resellers” after “would it be feasible for you,”

-- Would it be useful to gather data about the location of the Registrar?  The language of the registration agreement might or might not correlate to the location of the registrar.  May be useful??? 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-data/attachments/20180126/5f2f7da4/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-data/attachments/20180126/5f2f7da4/smime-0001.p7s>