[Gnso-rpm-sunrise] REMINDER - Action Item/Links & Agenda: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 19 Dec 1700 UTC

[Julie Hedlund]

Dear RPM Sunrise Sub Team members,

 

This is a reminder.

 

Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Wednesday, 19 December at 1800 UTC for 60 minutes.

 

Please also see the following action item, references, and links from the meeting notes below.

 

Best,

Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie

 

ACTION ITEM: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905. (BY 19 DEC)  See:

 

Question 5  (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) 

(a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period?

• Are there any unintended results?

• Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG?

• Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? 

• Are there any disadvantages?

 

Draft Agenda:

 

1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest

2. Select Sub Team Leader

3. Begin survey analysis

4. AOB

 

From: Gnso-rpm-sunrise <gnso-rpm-sunrise-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 at 3:55 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-sunrise at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-sunrise at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-rpm-sunrise] Actions & Notes: RPM Sunrise Sub Team Meeting 12 Dec 1800 UTC

 

Dear All,

 

Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 12 December 2018 (18:00-19:00 UTC).  Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2018-12-12+Sub+Team+for+Sunrise+Registrations. 

 

See also the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905.

   

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

==

 

NOTES & ACTION ITEMS

 

Actions:
Staff to add original numbering to the agreed questions. (DONE)
Sub Team members to volunteer or nominate candidates for Sub Team leader. (ONGOING)
Sub Team members: By Wednesday, 19 December 2018, analyze whether / how the data in Row 28-32 of the "TM & Brand Owners" tab answer the agreed question 5, sub question 5(a), and all the sub questions of 5(a), in the spreadsheet at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905. (BY 19 DEC)  See:
 

Question 5  (Final Charter Questions for Sunrise & Trademark Claims RPMs for Which Data is Being Sought) 

(a) Does the current 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period serve its intended purpose, particularly in view of the fact that many registry operators actually ran a 60-day Sunrise Period?

• Are there any unintended results?

• Does the ability of Registry Operators to expand their Sunrise Periods create uniformity concerns that should be addressed by this WG?

• Are there any benefits observed when the Sunrise Period is extended beyond 30 days? 

• Are there any disadvantages?

 

Notes:

 

1. Review agenda/Statements of Interest: No updates.

 

2. Select Sub Team Leader:  Take as an action item to ask for volunteers/nominations on the list.

 

3. Introduction to the survey analysis tool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aBw-dW2gBzvBfhUgl3u6ShWlPZt0yyNF-Vs1qmUuIjg/edit#gid=381275905

 

-- Column A: Questions based on the refined charter questions.

-- Column B: Actual survey question (but without the logic).

-- Some questions are asked of both actual and potential registrants, and some are related.

-- Column C: Sub Team's draft question.

-- Column D: Actual registrant response.

-- Column E: Potential registrant response

-- Column F: Findings from Analysis Group.

-- Look at the table -- there are some dividers -- noting what relates to Trademark Claims and Sunrise.

-- Sunrise: TM & Brand owners and Registry & Registrars.

 

4. Begin survey analysis:

 

-- Suggest looking at the questions across both surveys to see how the data answer/don't answer the questions.

-- Include link to the spreadsheet and indicate the questions/tabs.

-- Start at column A, row 27 -- registry operator pricing, overarching questions.

-- Review the data across the TM & Brand owners

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20181217/2f95d33c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4630 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-sunrise/attachments/20181217/2f95d33c/smime-0001.p7s>