[gnso-rpm-wg] 99%+ reduction in sunrise utilization rate per TLD supports EFF call for elimination of sunrise

[Greg Shatan]

George,

I don't see the math that created your "talking point" of a "99%+ reduction
in sunrise."  Can you show your work please?

I do think it's apropos that you compare this to the "success" (or lack
thereof) of the new gTLD program as a whole.  Sunrise is a part of the New
gTLD Program, and if their performance is similarly "successful" in your
estimation -- that's only to be expected.  We can't expect Sunrise
registrations to outperform the New gTLD Program generally. So, even if we
buy your metrics of "success" (which I don't), a Sunrise program that is
roughly as successful as the New gTLD Program as a whole is performing to
expectations.  I think that's a helpful way to look at Sunrise in context,
so thank you for that.

Greg

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:

> Ill bite here.
>
> Answer:  0 (zero).  Sunrise is not fit for its original purpose.  Few
> legitimate trademarks are being submitted.  There is evidence of abuse in
> sunrise registrations.  More importantly, the notice process seems more
> than sufficient to address the legitimate concerns.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:25, claudio di gangi <ipcdigangi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> George,
>
> I'm going to use an extreme example to illustrate my point.
>
> If 1,000,000 new gTLDs are launched in the next round, how many Sunrise
> registrations do think there should be order to reach the "success"
> threshold?
>
> Best,
> Claudio
>
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:50 PM George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:44 PM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
>> >with stats propped up with high counts of sub-$1
>> > registrations, or even domains that are stuffed into the accounts of
>> > registrants of other TLDs (e.g. .xxx with NSI, or .kiwi).
>>
>> Sorry, that was a typo. It should have been .XYZ with NSI, of course,
>> not .XXX, e.g.
>>
>> http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140605.htm
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> George Kirikos
>> 416-588-0269 <(416)%20588-0269>
>> http://www.leap.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
>> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170810/2c107418/attachment-0001.html>