[gnso-rpm-wg] Follow up from WG call this week
Mathieu Weill
mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
Mon Jan 9 11:44:48 UTC 2017
Dear Mary, Dear Colleagues,
Thanks for putting together the survey. I believe this may somewhat help
collect more responses, but would like to reiterate a comment I made in the
chat (although it got no traction at the time, but my audio was limited)
during the last call.
My organization, Afnic, is one of the few who submitted a response to the
survey so far. We did it on behalf of one of our clients, the City of Paris.
I have significant concerns about reaching out directly to registries, for
the following reasons :
- The questions are extremely technical, and most of our clients
would be completely lost
- There is no clear benefit for registries to invest time in
answering this survey. The TMCH is often “dealt with” by a partner /
provider.
I understand the need to collect data from registries, but would suggest
either of two options :
1) Consider that the low level of responses is an information in
itself, and leave it at that.
2) Reach out to registry service providers rather than registries to
collect more meaningful data.
Just my two cents as a respondent to the survey.
Best
Mathieu
De : gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org] De
la part de Mary Wong
Envoyé : vendredi 6 janvier 2017 23:08
À : gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Objet : [gnso-rpm-wg] Follow up from WG call this week
Dear all,
As requested during the Working Group call held earlier this week, staff has
put all the questions that were sent to the Registries Stakeholder Group by
the TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team into a survey format. You can preview and
test it here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=twhcvzt1lfNFkO_2BF7lNnr7iX41Ca6gce_2BEqGy7WKuGCzlJFTYJqbEcIQPe6n2COQ.
Please note that while we have retained almost all of the text of the
original questions, in a few places we have rearranged their order or
converted a question into a statement inviting comment. However, we do not
believe we have changed any of the scope or intent of the questions, and we
have not otherwise edited, deleted or added any questions.
Also as agreed on the call, staff will work with the co-chairs to transmit
this survey to specific registry operators (especially those offering
blocking mechanism services who have not yet responded to the original
solicitation for feedback) and via the registry members of this Working
Group.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong at icann.org
Telephone: +1-603-5744889
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170109/cf283957/attachment.html>
More information about the gnso-rpm-wg
mailing list