[gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

[Paul McGrady]

Thanks Kathy.  Are there STI record showing that it was affirmatively open?
It may have been simply not discussed and each side assumed their own view?
I admit to not recalling, but I think we need to check the STI records to
confirm one way or another (if possible).

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 

From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 10:14 AM
To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars
and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

 

I have yet to review this material, but I have been reaching out to STI
Members. When the TMCH Database left the STI, GNSO Council, and ICANN Board
acceptance it was an open database. 

I think we have an interesting issue to review. 

Best, Kathy

 

On 3/29/2017 10:17 AM, Mary Wong wrote:

Hello everyone,

 

If it will help, the need to maintain the confidentiality of the TMCH
Database (TMDB) was discussed by the Implementation Assistance Group (IAG),
working between October 2011 and May 2012 and consisting of community
volunteers. The IAG was convened to develop and recommend business
requirements around specific issues in the provision of Sunrise and Claims
Notification services through the TMCH.

 

The attached document excerpts some text from the IAG's final report that
seems to indicate that the IAG considered the question as to whether and why
the TMDB was to be a confidential database. Please note that staff is
providing this text purely for informational purposes, and takes no position
as to whether or not the TMDB should continue to remain confidential.

 

Cheers

Mary

 

From:  <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>
<gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Paul Keating
<mailto:Paul at law.es> <Paul at law.es>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 23:08
To: "J. Scott Evans"  <mailto:jsevans at adobe.com> <jsevans at adobe.com>
Cc:  <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org"
<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>, Michael Karanicolas
<mailto:michael at law-democracy.org> <michael at law-democracy.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars
and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

 

I've not yet seen any such articulated reasons.  Care to provide them?

Sent from my iPad


On 28 Mar 2017, at 22:40, J. Scott Evans <jsevans at adobe.com
<mailto:jsevans at adobe.com> > wrote:

Paul:

 

I think the proponents of the closed database have repeatedly articulated
the benefits they see in a closed database. That is the status quo. In order
to change the status quo, it is the proponents for an open system that need
to articulate (persuasively) an overriding need or benefit for such a
change.

 

J. Scott

 


<image001.gif>


J. Scott Evans

408.536.5336 (tel)

345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544


Director, Associate General Counsel

408.709.6162 (cell)

San Jose, CA, 95110, USA


Adobe. Make It an Experience.

jsevans at adobe.com <mailto:jsevans at adobe.com> 

www.adobe.com[adobe.com]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adobe.com&d=DwMCaQ&
c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl
7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=xzS0_a7gh_CbP93HDCn4gCiEPf61PKMba02eWelzxC0&s=QGu3yeTOdbOc
CfjnVYkndyNSP8JSD3FM3-F3Icw1jYE&e=> 

 


 

 

 

From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org>
> on behalf of Paul Keating <paul at law.es <mailto:paul at law.es> >
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM
To: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be <mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be> >
Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> "
<gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> >, Michael Karanicolas
<michael at law-democracy.org <mailto:michael at law-democracy.org> >
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars
and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services

 

Question.

 

solutions for the issues and concerns that have been





mitigated by having the database be closed

 

Can someone please list the issues and concerns at issue here?

 

And, how has closing the database mitigated any of them?

Sent from my iPad


On 28 Mar 2017, at 21:07, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo at aim.be
<mailto:marie.pattullo at aim.be> > wrote:

solutions for the issues and concerns that have been

mitigated by having the database be closed






_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org> 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170329/14d4481d/attachment-0001.html>