[GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub Team -- Proposal for Submission and Apologies

[Paul Tattersfield]

Hi Michael,

Couple of quick questions

Wouldn't single letter marks generate a lot of notices especially an 'a' or
'e' ?

Would it be possible to just send a notfication email to the mark holder so
they could remain informed of new registrations and be able to montior the
new domains and thereby avoid the chilling effect of lots of TMCH notices
to gwnuine registrants?

Best regards,

Paul.

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 5:14 PM Paul Keating <Paul at law.es> wrote:

> With all respect to Michael, I do not believe this proposal should be
> accepted at this time.
>
>
>
> Questions 7 and 8 remain unanswered.  These are important threshold
> questions that the proponent should complete prior to submission.
> Otherwise the work group is bogged down considering or perhaps even
> assisting in the development of basic rationale for the proposal.  This
> should be undertaken by the proponent.
>
>
>
> Thus, here we have a proposal to significantly expand the scope of
> notification.  It would, for example, trigger a notice for Apple Computers
> if I wanted to register Pineapple. xyz or a trademark holder for “THE” if I
> wanted to register Theater.club or for Nike if I wanted to register
> Airplane.xyz
>
>
>
> The proposal provides no evidence that would support the proposal
> (Question 7).
>
>
>
> Nor does it reference any data reviewed by the Sub Team that show any need
> to address the issue (Question 8).
>
>
>
>
>
> With a properly completed questionnaire this may become a legitimate
> request but it currently does not meet the requirements IMHO.
>
>
>
> Paul Keating
>
>
>
> *From: *GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "Michael
> Graham (ELCA) via GNSO-RPM-WG" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Reply-To: *"Michael Graham (ELCA)" <migraham at expediagroup.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 5:40 PM
> *To: *Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <
> gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[GNSO-RPM-WG] GNSO RPM-Trademark Claims Notice Sub Team --
> Proposal for Submission and Apologies
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, I will not be able to attend the call today due to pressing
> business matters.  Because the schedule calls for discussion of answers and
> proposals regarding Question 4 regarding whether the Exact Match standard
> for sending Claims Notices should be extended, and I wish to resubmit my
> “Exact Match Plus” proposal for either the Sub Team’s approval or approval
> for placing before the community for Public Comment, I am attaching my
> proposal – which I have revised to the form for submission of proposals.  I
> have not completed the references to Evidence, and had hoped to do so in
> part today during our call.  I shall, however, complete this if granted
> time to do so before our next call.
>
>
>
> Thank you all for your consideration and indulgence,
>
> Michael R.
>
> _______________________________________________ GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20190509/08add22e/attachment-0001.html>