[GNSO-RPM-WG] Simplified language to bring together individual TMCH #4 & #5 proposals

[Paul Tattersfield]

*AGB TMCH (4 June 2012)*

3.2 The standards for inclusion in the Clearinghouse are:
3.2.1 Nationally or regionally registered word marks from all jurisdictions.
3.2.2 Any word mark that has been validated through a court of law or other
judicial proceeding.
3.2.3 Any word mark protected by a statute or treaty in effect at the time
the mark is submitted to the Clearinghouse for inclusion.
3.2.4 Other marks that constitute intellectual property.
3.2.5 Protections afforded to trademark registrations do not extend to
applications for registrations, marks within any opposition period or
registered marks that were the subject of successful invalidation,
cancellation or rectification proceedings


My understanding is those drafting the AGB TMCH policies wished to have a
catch all for marks excluded from 3.2.1, 3.2.2 & 3.2.3 which could be
tailored to individual registry operators requirements.

The original wording has not been changed in any way.

I agree with you it is very wide open it could include unregistered marks
for example, but I believe this is as was intended by those drafting the
original clauses to afford registry operators as much local flexibility as
possible.

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:55 PM Paul Keating <paul at law.es> wrote:

> Paul,
>
>
>
> I am still confused about the application of 3.2.4 and my confusion
> continues with the addition of 3.2.9.
>
>
>
> Can someone please explain the following:
>
>
>
>    1. Reason for having 3.2.4 at all?
>    2. Reason for the “ancillary database”
>
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
>
> Paul Keating
>
>
>
> *From: *GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Paul
> Tattersfield <gpmgroup at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 1:24 PM
> *To: *gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Simplified language to bring together
> individual TMCH #4 & #5 proposals
>
>
>
> Hi All, Please see below improved wording for 3.2.7 bringing together GAC
> advice and Mary’s / Staff observations and new clauses 3.2.8 & 3.2.9
> clarifying working group member’s policy intentions. Best regards, Paul
>
>
> 3.2.7     Word marks here include service marks, collective marks,
> certification marks and word marks protected by statute or treaty.
>
> 3.2.8     Sunrise and Claims services available through the TMCH are
> limited only to word marks under sections 3.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.2.3 (as
> further limited by sections 3.2.5 and 3.2.6).
>
> 3.2.9     Nothing in section 3.2 shall exclude the TMCH provider and
> registry operators from offering additional voluntary services to mark
> holders (e.g. via ancillary databases). Marks under section 3.2.4 must be
> held in an ancillary database.
>
>
>
> *Implementation of Consensus Policy for the Protection of Red Cross & Red
> Crescent Identifiers*
> https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2020-02-18-en
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20200730/1ec131b2/attachment.html>