[Gnso-ssc] [Potential Spoof] Re: [Potential Spoof] Re: For your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options

Tue Apr 4 06:50:25 UTC 2017

Hello All,

I agree with this move, but do we really have three conf calls ? Or are 
they three occasions to meet for those who were not available ?

Best

Frederic

Le 04/04/2017 à 00:26, Susan Kawaguchi a écrit :
>
> Hello All,
>
> Looks like we have 3 phone calls scheduled but haven’t made a firm 
> decision on the Surveymonkey template.
>
> Unless I missed an email today Julf, Frederick, Renata and I support 
> Option 1.
>
> Since we are limited on time I would suggest that we move ahead now 
> with Option 1 and have staff send out the SurveyMonkey to the SSC.
>
> Let me know, if any one opposes this step forward.
>
> Susan
>
> *From: *<gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Susan Kawaguchi 
> <susank at fb.com>
> *Date: *Monday, April 3, 2017 at 10:28 AM
> *To: *Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
> *Cc: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Potential Spoof] Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Potential Spoof] Re: For 
> your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options
>
> Correction -
>
> I would prefer option 2 of the survey monkey template but I am fine 
> with option 1 also.
> On Apr 3, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Susan Kawaguchi <susank at fb.com 
> <mailto:susank at fb.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> I would prefer option 2 of the survey monkey template but I am fine 
> with option 2 also.
>
> I agree that the survey results should be transparent and shared if 
> requested.
>
> Hopefully, the others will chime in soon and we can all start working 
> on reviewing the candidates, filling out the survey in prep for the 
> Wednesday call
>
> Susan
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2017, at 6:17 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org 
> <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>> wrote:
>
> All, so far the feedback is as follows:
>
> Preference for option 1: Julf, Frederick, Renata
>
> Preference for option 2: Poncelet
>
> Can you please weigh in as soon as possible so we are able to launch 
> the survey with sufficient time before the next meeting? We will also 
> need your feedback concerning how the results are shared. Renate has 
> already indicated that she prefers the survey results, including 
> individual responses to be shared publicly.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> *From: *<gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings 
> <marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>>
> *Date: *Thursday, March 30, 2017 at 20:20
> *To: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>" 
> <gnso-ssc at icann.org <mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-ssc] For your review - RDS RT evaluation survey options
>
> Dear All,
>
> Following on from the call today, staff has gone ahead and created two 
> (for now) possible approaches for a survey to review the candidates 
> for the RDS Review Team:
>
> ·Option 1 – See 
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid_2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K[surveymonkey.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D0hjSAi4ZCoUvdD2Kv0gANdf5YVqJkYkY72BakcBodNIid-5F2FUGWhFFHZYmxyB7zn0K&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2zNUmJODrxcFaE9ZlN-Gx2Ku8s1bE0nCPqcUT4GYQ74&s=Q8Nn4WU6CuYLmVysl8yVLg-C6A5t4pLc9_hCNvZvwAc&e=> 
> for a preview. This is a very straightforward approach which first 
> asks two questions in relation to whether the candidate qualifies as a 
> GNSO candidate (yes/no-don’t know) and whether the candidate has the 
> necessary expertise and competence (yes/no-don’t know), followed by a 
> ranking of the candidates. This approach is similar to the one used by 
> the volunteers that reviewed the SSR2-RT candidates.
>
> ·Option 2 – See 
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0_2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ[surveymonkey.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_Preview_-3Fsm-3D3yLMDGyDuJTXv7WxGEXYmZTUiaAeDz3ZMxJ6g2UuNK6V0-5F2FXUhfilY6EjEGBvPgJQ&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=2zNUmJODrxcFaE9ZlN-Gx2Ku8s1bE0nCPqcUT4GYQ74&s=wPB5kUKuUiCZj5IX0W24JOGRccTZsjw8FU76kLhm6TQ&e=> 
> for a preview. This survey goes into a bit more detail as it asks to 
> rank the candidates based on how the meet 1) the skills and expertise 
> as outlined in the call for volunteers, and 2) the desired attributes 
> as outlined in the call for volunteers. This option could be further 
> refined by asking a ranking for each individual skill / expertise 
> and/or desired attribute, but that would make the survey significantly 
> longer and would also take you more time to complete. The aggregated 
> score could be used to obtain an overall ranking based on the 
> responses from all.
>
> Note that these two options are in preview mode – any responses will 
> not be recorded.
>
> Please share with the list which approach has your preference and/or 
> which modifications or alternative approaches should be added to this 
> list of options.
>
> Once the SSC has agreed on an approach, you will also need to decide 
> whether you intend to share the individual survey responses with the 
> SSC or only the aggregated results as well as whether you intend to 
> share these publicly. As noted on the call today, the charter foresees 
> that “To facilitate its deliberations, the SSC may decide to conduct 
> some or all of its deliberations in private, but if so, it is expected 
> to provide a rationale with its recommendations”.
>
> We would like to ask you to share your feedback as soon as possible so 
> that ideally the survey will be launched early next week to allow for 
> review and discussion of the results during next week’s meeting 
> (please remember to fill out the doodle poll that has been circulated 
> by Nathalie).
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> **
>
> P.S. You will also find attached the updated summary document which 
> now includes a column for gender.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dssc&d=DwICAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=FU2GfV7QNpZjoawq9PNbsA_5tJPqwFGrUig0P66Cu3s&s=CKj-VLCtQRo3Jb4lz5Se_Rm6SwM1_gUvIqKoltHAHq8&e= 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_gnso-2Dssc&d=DwICAg&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=gvEx8xF7ynrYQ7wShqEr-w&m=yAfHVz9RUufVQod_bgM44dVCJ_7DcNtE7d0BAZ0_qc8&s=AWUQYyhuXQJ12ExXkYQ16OtBgMhu5GRnu39tiSd4A84&e= 
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

-- 
photo 		
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> 
<http://twitter.com/safebrands>
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 
<tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 
<tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 
<tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
Skype: mailclub1 <#>
www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée 
vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en 
dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20170404/383fa94a/attachment-0001.html>