[Gnso-ssc] Please participate - Evaluation Survey GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team

Tue Apr 4 15:28:18 UTC 2017

Dear Marika, 

Please add these notes to the result of the poll:

1. The name of the voting 
"Evaluation of GNSO Candidates for RDS Review Team (option 1)"
is incorrect due to not all the following persons being GNSO Candidates, 
I suggest we replace it with "Evaluation of applicants who claimed to be with GNSO for RDS Review Team (option 1)"

2. The GNSO endorsement should be obtained from the  relevant  SG/C chair (directly, and not via poll  about " personal experience" of SSC group members)  and since the responses of SO/AC leaders are expected to be received by 25th April 2017, we need to take into account that the current voting item 3 (about GNSO endorsement) should be seen as a draft based on non confirmed/not full  information.

We are in the position of not knowing/being able to endorse all people who claim "GNSO" affiliation.

3. Also I need underline that single choice of "No / Don't know" for items 2 and 3 does not allow to understand, was it NO or Do not Know.

4. The preparation work (Staff assessment of Applicants Expertise) has only four choices  (None/Meets Some/Meets  Most/Meets All) and the methodology of resolution, which level to set for the particular candidate is not presented to SSC so far. 

5. I suggest that the chart is reformatted to create single sheet with three additional columns:
 "Geography", 
"AC/SO" with reflection of the part of GNSO person has affiliation to , like GNSO-RrSG/GNSO-RySG...e.t.c.,  and it should be the same GNSO body, which confirms endorsement (just GNSO is too broad, we need to avoid confusion ),
"SOI" with URL to the Statements of Interest (if any).
The reason to do so is to receive a single sheet with applicable filters, which makes it usable.

6.Name of Remmy Nweke applicant should be corrected (listed in the poll as Rummy Nweke.

7. For the applicant Subham Charae e-mail subhamcharan at gmail.com included twice, the same for  Stephanie Perrin (one of the records show 50%+ participation and the activity, and the other is not ... which is strange , given the same e-mail used), the same for Emily Taylor (withdrawn application).

8. Unfortunately I failed to find, which part of GNSO Vignesh Pamu, Pitinan Kooamornpatana (Fellowship approved for ICANN59, Business ) ,Subham Charan (in application: As of now NO experience, fresher ) are affiliated with.	I suggest we request those applicants to identify, how they joined GNSO, and which part.

9. Also it is not clear, which part of GNSO Erika Mann is affiliated with at the moment.

10. Given the short notice it was not possible to receive opinion of my SG, so I suggest that the output of this voting  is used as a draft attempt . 

11.All applicants have to be on the same chart for a proper review. We need to ensure qualifications of candidates are best possible from the given pool and then ensure diversity (and not vice versa).

-----

Also I have few questions , which I think will help us to better understand the situation:

Could you send us the reason for a hurry are all are in?

What the deadlines are?

Who set it?

What was the reason to doing so?

Sincerely Yours,

Maxim Alzoba
Special projects manager,
International Relations Department,
FAITID

m. +7 916 6761580
skype oldfrogger

Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)

> On Apr 4, 2017, at 02:56, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> The Evaluation Survey for GNSO Candidates for the RDS Review Team is now live: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GNSORDSRT <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GNSORDSRT>. Please complete the survey as soon as possible, but at the latest COB Tuesday 4 April so that the results can be aggregated for Wednesday’s SSC meeting. Prior to completing the survey, please make sure to review the candidate applications as well as the call for volunteers which outlines the responsibilities, skills & experience and desired attributes – see https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw <https://community.icann.org/x/6b-RAw>. As there were no objections, the results, both aggregated as well as well as individual responses, will be shared public. Do take into account the potential sensitivity of individual comments as you fill out the survey.
>  
> Best regards,
>  
> Marika
> Marika Konings
> Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
> Email: marika.konings at icann.org <mailto:marika.konings at icann.org>  
>  
> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20170404/6405b932/attachment.html>