[Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS

[Maxim Alzoba]

Hello Julf,

Do we want to sacrifice expertise in technical field and  in operations, and knowledge of real life scenarios in sake of diversity?

I do not belive that it will add value to the review team.
-- 
Maxim Alzoba, 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my typos.


-------- Original Message --------
From: Johan Helsingius <julf at julf.com>
Sent: 13 April 2017 16:42:45 GMT+03:00
To: gnso-ssc at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ssc] SSC / Team review for RDS

Dear Frédéric (and all),

So as far as I understand, you are suggesting making the
list be:

1-3: Susan Kawaguchi, Erika Mann and Volker Greimann
4-7: Stephanie Perrin, Marc Anderson, Stefania Milan and
     Timothy Chen

That would be one person from the BC, one NCA and one RrSG
appointee. I have to argue that that doesn't really improve
the diversity, as it would create a situation where no
non-commercial people are represented.

As such I don't have a strong feeling this way or that, but
as the original top 3 all come with a much higher score
than the people ranked 4-7, I fear we would be selecting less
qualified people in the name of a non-existent improvement
in diversity.

	Julf


On 12-04-17 17:22, Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands wrote:
> Dear All
> 
> I am coming back to you regarding the selection that was issued by the
> team on Monday.
> 
> As i explained to you, i think the process should have taken one more
> validation step, as it was scheduled.
> 
> In fact, i still believe that this list, without any Registry or
> Registrar, on this matter, is not a wise solution, or at least does not
> send a right message of commitment to the community :
> 
> To solve that issue, as i suggested, we could switch seats 3 and 4 (or
> 5) to  include either Marc or Volker. This way, the voice of the team
> would be stronger / have more credibility when they will have to push
> their ideas to other components of Icann.
> 
> This feeling is shared by both constituencies, and i really think it
> would be easier,  to make this change within the team, to reach a
> consensus based decision, before having to present that list to the gnso.
> 
> That would not be the first time a list or guide is changed after
> publication, and to me it is for the better,
> 
> Please take that in consideration,
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> photo 		
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> <http://twitter.com/safebrands>
> Frédéric Guillemaut
> Directeur Associé, SafeBrands
> 
> Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07
> <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
> France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22
> <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
> Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27
> <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
> fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
> Skype: mailclub1 <#>
> www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
> Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France
> 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>
> 
> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée
> vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en
> dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
> 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ssc mailing list
Gnso-ssc at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc