[Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: FW: For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT

Frédéric Guillemaut fg at safebrands.com
Wed Apr 19 15:17:20 UTC 2017


Héllo. 
I agree to this : 
Saying we came to consensus on proposing 4 seats. 


Frederic Guillemaut
COO
SafeBrands
fg at safebrands.com




> Le 19 avr. 2017 à 17:12, Maxim Alzoba <m.alzoba at gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello Marika, 
> 
> If the proper way is to explicitly request 4 seat - calling this a consensus, 
> 
> and then rework this in case of GNSO Council denial
> 
> to reach the new consensus for 3 seats (taking additional time and efforts), 
> 
> then I think we need to go with the text of the letter mentioning 4 seats (and I think we need Frederic to support to say that it was a consensus).
> 
> 
> 
> Sincerely Yours,
> 
> Maxim Alzoba
> Special projects manager,
> International Relations Department,
> FAITID
> 
> m. +7 916 6761580
> skype oldfrogger
> 
> Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
> 
>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 18:01, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Maxim,
>> 
>> Thanks for your feedback. My understanding was that if there would be no support by the GNSO Council for the approach proposed by the SSC (or by the SSC for that matter), Julf would withdraw the motion and request for additional time for the SSC to come to full consensus. This is something that Julf could also communicate if/when he submits the revised motion to the GNSO Council, but it does not seem that this needs to be called out in the motion itself as that is subject to an up or down vote. Does that make sense?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Marika
>> 
>> On 4/19/17, 08:45, "Maxim Alzoba" <m.alzoba at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>   Hello Marika, 
>> 
>>   Please find my comments in Google Doc
>>   & attached downloaded version.
>> 
>>   P.s: My constituency is going to have a confcall in 15 minutes, and I hope to have their opinion by beginning of our confcall today.
>> 
>>   Sincerely Yours,
>> 
>>   Maxim Alzoba
>>   Special projects manager,
>>   International Relations Department,
>>   FAITID
>> 
>>   m. +7 916 6761580
>>   skype oldfrogger
>> 
>>   Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 17:28, Novoa, Osvaldo <onovoa at Antel.com.uy> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thank you Marika,
>>> I was waiting for comments from my constituency.
>>> I support this motion.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Osvaldo Novoa
>>> 
>>> -----Mensaje original-----
>>> De: gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org] En nombre de Marika Konings
>>> Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de abril de 2017 11:19 a.m.
>>> Para: Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>>> CC: gnso-ssc at icann.org
>>> Asunto: Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: FW: For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT
>>> 
>>> Thanks, Renate. Per your suggestion, please see updated version attached. Are there any objections to this change?
>>> 
>>> Note that there are still quite a few people that have not weighed in on the proposed approach forward. So far, I’ve seen support from Poncelet, Julf and Renate. We have our call coming up in less than 3 hours so any feedback you may have in advance would be welcome.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> 
>>> Marika
>>> 
>>> On 4/18/17, 20:47, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  Hi
>>> 
>>>  Just as yesterday, I support this approach.
>>> 
>>>  I just have one observation about the text of the motion - It lists
>>>  candidates first in (surname) alphabetical order and then in ranking
>>>  order.
>>>  It would be clearer if the top 4 were also on ranking order.
>>> 
>>>  Thanks
>>> 
>>>  Renata
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marika Konings
>>>  <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>>>> Thanks, Julf. I know that several of you expressed support for the approach on the way forward yesterday, but I just want to make sure that the proposed changes to the motion meet everyone’s expectations with regards to what was discussed. In addition, we especially need to hear from those of you that were not able to make the meeting.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>> Marika
>>>> 
>>>> On 4/18/17, 08:53, "gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  Dear Marika,
>>>> 
>>>>> So far
>>>>> I’ve only seen Poncelet express his support for the proposed way
>>>>> forward.
>>>> 
>>>>  I assumed that it was clear from our call that I support this approach,
>>>>  but let me hereby state it explicitly.
>>>> 
>>>>      Julf
>>>> 
>>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>>  Gnso-ssc mailing list
>>>>  Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>>>>  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Gnso-ssc mailing list
>>>> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> 
>>> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
>>> 
>>> 
>>> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-ssc mailing list
>>> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc


More information about the Gnso-ssc mailing list