[Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: FW: For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT

[Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands]

Hello


i support the latest version.

Frederic



Le 19/04/2017 à 16:18, Marika Konings a écrit :
> Thanks, Renate. Per your suggestion, please see updated version attached. Are there any objections to this change?
>
> Note that there are still quite a few people that have not weighed in on the proposed approach forward. So far, I’ve seen support from Poncelet, Julf and Renate. We have our call coming up in less than 3 hours so any feedback you may have in advance would be welcome.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> On 4/18/17, 20:47, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>      Hi
>      
>      Just as yesterday, I support this approach.
>      
>      I just have one observation about the text of the motion - It lists
>      candidates first in (surname) alphabetical order and then in ranking
>      order.
>      It would be clearer if the top 4 were also on ranking order.
>      
>      Thanks
>      
>      Renata
>      
>      
>      On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marika Konings
>      <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>      > Thanks, Julf. I know that several of you expressed support for the approach on the way forward yesterday, but I just want to make sure that the proposed changes to the motion meet everyone’s expectations with regards to what was discussed. In addition, we especially need to hear from those of you that were not able to make the meeting.
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      >
>      > Marika
>      >
>      > On 4/18/17, 08:53, "gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
>      >
>      >     Dear Marika,
>      >
>      >     > So far
>      >     > I’ve only seen Poncelet express his support for the proposed way
>      >     > forward.
>      >
>      >     I assumed that it was clear from our call that I support this approach,
>      >     but let me hereby state it explicitly.
>      >
>      >         Julf
>      >
>      >     _______________________________________________
>      >     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>      >     Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>      >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>      >
>      >
>      > _______________________________________________
>      > Gnso-ssc mailing list
>      > Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>      > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>      
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc

-- 
photo 		
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> 
<http://twitter.com/safebrands>
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 
<tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 
<tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 
<tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
Skype: mailclub1 <#>
www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée 
vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en 
dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20170419/0d396dec/attachment-0001.html>