[Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT

Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands fg at safebrands.com
Mon Jan 29 17:26:11 UTC 2018


ok, in that case , it's fine,


my mistake.


And the poll is fine.

Frederic


Le 29/01/2018 à 18:19, Emily Barabas a écrit :
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> Thanks for your question. Is this the list you are referring to: 
> https://community.icann.org/display/GSSC/SSR2-RT ?
>
> I apologize for any confusion. I should have clarified that this wiki 
> page was the one we set up for the previous SSR2 selection process the 
> SSC conducted in Summer 2017.
>
> In that previous process, the SSC was considering three candidates: 
> Rao Naveed Bin Rais, Scott McCormick, and Norm Ritchie. The SSC 
> selected Norm Ritchie, who is currently serving on the SSR2-RT.
>
> Rao Naveed Bin Rais and Scott McCormick are the two applicants 
> remaining in the pool of candidates, so we are only considering these 
> two at this time.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
> *From: *Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Frédéric 
> Guillemaut - SafeBrands <fg at safebrands.com>
> *Organization: *SafeBrands
> *Date: *Monday 29 January 2018 at 18:09
> *To: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Gnso-ssc] Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
>
> Hello  All,
>
> Sorry, i might have read something wrong.
>
> But on the survey i can only find two candidates (Scott and Rao) 
> whereas on the list of candidates we have Norm Richie + the two others.
> Did i miss something ?
>
> Otherwise, this is very accurate.
>
> Best regards
>
> Fredric
>
> Le 29/01/2018 à 00:20, Novoa, Osvaldo a écrit :
>
>     +1
>
>     Enviado desde mi iPhone
>
>     El 27 ene. 2018, a la(s) 12:11, Rafik Dammak
>     <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com><mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>>
>     escribió:
>
>     Hi,He
>
>     I reviewed the draft poll and looks good for me.
>
>     Best,
>
>     Rafik
>
>     On Jan 26, 2018 11:30 AM, "Susan Kawaguchi"
>     <susankpolicy at gmail.com<mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com><mailto:susankpolicy at gmail.com>>
>     wrote:
>
>       I have reviewed the poll and it seems very easy to insert input
>     I am fine with it.
>
>     Thanks for setting it up.
>
>     On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Emily Barabas
>     <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
>     wrote:
>
>     Dear SSC members,
>
>     It appears that Survey Monkey is now requiring users to login to
>     use the poll in “preview” mode. I apologize for that. I don’t
>     think this was previously the case with this mode.
>
>     To ensure everyone can test the poll, I’ve gone ahead and opened
>     it. Please use this link:
>     https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/DFHMTT5[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_r_DFHMTT5&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=V7imr53noY7Wa3YeaTiTF5JmtwaNoVOPEc42s63rJ-E&e=>.
>     I will clear the results before we start officially collecting
>     votes, so feel free to submit “test” answers.
>
>     Let’s extend the deadline for testing the poll. How about Tuesday
>     30 January at 11:00 UTC? If anyone needs more time, please just
>     let me know.
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Emily
>
>     From: Emily Barabas
>     <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
>
>     Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 21:51
>
>     To:
>     "gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>"
>     <gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>>
>
>     Subject: Draft poll - skills matrix evaluation - SSR2-RT
>
>     Dear SSC members,
>
>     Following an action item from the call today, staff has produced a
>     draft poll to evaluate remaining SSR2-RT candidates based on
>     attributes included in the attached skills matrix. Please find a
>     preview of the draft poll here:
>     https://www.surveymonkey.com/create/preview/?sm=50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s_2BehtuuSaiKM_3D&tab_clicked=1[surveymonkey.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.surveymonkey.com_create_preview_-3Fsm-3D50pEczALMZ80V7EW8NRJ5gXbjv4aYn8s-5F2BehtuuSaiKM-5F3D-26tab-5Fclicked-3D1&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=Z3dPzBXjhfwC7NtZYkHilbyh6gK2s3RHqIRLs2FYApU&e=>.
>
>     Please note that the poll is not yet open. The preview allows you
>     to test the format and provide feedback. If you would like to
>     suggest changes to the poll content or format, please send your
>     input by 20:00 UTC on Sunday 28 January. Staff will open the poll
>     on Monday.
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Emily
>
>     From: Emily Barabas
>     <emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>>
>
>     Date: Thursday 25 January 2018 at 09:08
>
>     To:
>     "gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>"
>     <gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:gnso-ssc at icann.org>>
>
>     Subject: Notes and Action Items - SSC Meeting - 25 January 2018
>
>     Dear SSC members,
>
>     Please see below the action items and discussion notes from our
>     meeting today.  These high-level notes are designed to help WG
>     members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant
>     to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are
>     posted on the wiki at:
>     https://community.icann.org/x/Uge8B[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Uge8B&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=L_Yl73ePtLMz9RwZTp1XQn21M3O9_xdtP734n-5QF1s&e=>.
>
>     For reference, the proposed draft revisions to the SSC Charter are
>     attached. Members are encouraged to send comments about this
>     document to the list. In particular, please provide input on the
>     Transparency section on page 4.
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>     Emily
>
>     ACTION ITEMS
>
>     Action Item 1: Staff will circulate draft poll for feedback
>     comparing skills of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and rows in the
>     attached skills matrix.
>
>     Action Item 2: SSC members will review the attached redline
>     charter and provide feedback, with particular focus on the
>     Transparency section on page 4.
>
>     Action Item 3: Staff will send out a Doodle poll for the next
>     meeting, planned for the second week of February.
>
>     NOTES:
>
>     1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
>
>     - no SOI updates
>
>     2. Comparison of remaining SSR2-RT candidates and matrix of skills
>     produced by existing SSR2-RT members
>
>     - GNSO Council has tasked SSC with comparing the two remaining
>     candidates for the SSR-RT with the skills matrix produced by the
>     existing SSR-RT candidates.
>
>     - Existing team appears to be fairly balanced. There does not
>     appear to be any category that is an obvious gap.
>
>     - The candidates have distinct skill sets.
>
>     - One possible path forward - one or two members take the lead in
>     filling in candidate skills in the table. The rest of the group
>     reviews and refines this analysis.
>
>     - Alternate approach - conduct a poll among all members.
>
>     - The SSC could also go back to the original poll completed
>     earlier this year and see how the candidates compare, noting that
>     this poll is less granular.
>
>     - Reminder that the Council tasked the SSC with focusing on the
>     skills matrix and whether candidates fill any gaps. This is not
>     yet a selection assignment.
>
>     - Members agree to conduct a new poll (see action item).
>
>     3. Review of draft proposed revisions to the SSC Charter
>
>     - Staff has created a first draft of the proposed revised charter
>     based on the feedback received from SSC members and discussion on
>     the previous call.
>
>     From the chat:
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: I think we need feedback from other members too
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: I have a comment about page5 - the described
>     situation is related to the case where there is no consensus and
>     SSC needs to report the issue to the GNSO Councel with prepared
>     reasoning and options
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: it was about minority views
>
>     - Support expressed for keeping text: "as well as any minority
>     views, should these exist” (at the bottom of page 5).
>
>     - Regarding the section on Transparency, the optics might be a
>     challenge if we publish information about deliberations before the
>     Council has made a decision.
>
>     - One suggestion -- make deliberations private, including call
>     recordings, and email list before a decision is made, publish this
>     information later.
>
>     - Alternately, the group continue with the status quo and ensure
>     timely communication to candidates when the group notifies the
>     GNSO Council of its recommendation.
>
>     From the chat:
>
>     Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I'm much more in favor of making this list
>     only private
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: @Renata, I am not sure we can do it
>
>     Renata Aquino Ribeiro: I think halfway solutions are awkward.
>     Either we have full transparency or not.
>
>     Renata Aquino Ribeiro: and prone to errors, non-records
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: if we do not find the way to properly design delayed
>     output model, we might continue the usual way of SSC
>
>     Renata Aquino Ribeiro: i think the delay is just for the announcement
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: after all it works more or less Ok
>
>     Renata Aquino Ribeiro: (which is only real anyway once GNSO right?)
>
>     Emily Barabas: Perhaps the group can start with timely
>     notifications and then if it encounters issues, look into further
>     measures?
>
>     Maxim Alzoba: when we release the same info to all participants,
>     it is both transparent and clear... we might need a proper
>     disclaimer section of such messages
>
>     - Suggestion – revis-t timeline document to ensure the group is
>     notifying candidates in a timely manner.
>
>     - Suggestion -- add additional clarification in the email from the
>     SSC to candidates with disclaimer text.
>
>     4. AOB
>
>     - none
>
>     Emily Barabas | Senior Policy Specialist
>
>     ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
>     Email:
>     emily.barabas at icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org><mailto:emily.barabas at icann.org>|
>     Phone: +31 (0)6
>     84507976<tel:+31%206%2084507976><tel:+31%206%2084507976>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org><mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>
>     ________________________________
>
>     El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está
>     dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene
>     información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el
>     destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente
>     respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el
>     e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema.
>     Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este
>     e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas
>     destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad
>     con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida
>     incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
>
>     This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended
>     solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient
>     please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and
>     delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or
>     copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the
>     specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for
>     any communication emitted without respecting our Information
>     Security Policy.
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>
> -- 
>
> photo
>
> 	
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/frames/frame_bubble_left_top_part.png
>
> 	
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/linkedin.png[linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=RVc_XBQrXix_NZTjKNVCpxov4HWgILjIaVkqQyxn080&e=>https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons_32/twitter.png[twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__twitter.com_safebrands&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=aYY-QkZ9WufbZngnj2_sL5zyxqOhDkc_4C35qOIGD9c&e=>
>
> Frédéric Guillemaut
> Directeur Associé, SafeBrands
>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.pngDirect 
> : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 
> <tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/phone2.pngFrance 
> : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 
> <tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/mobile.pngMobile 
> : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 
> <tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/email1.pngfg@safebrands.com 
> <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/social.pngSkype: 
> mailclub1
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/website.pngwww.safebrands.com 
> [safebrands.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.safebrands.com&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=brjvksQNR9obASBDHYvrwFPMQFGIEXGcN2R2ndblsBQ&e=>
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/symbols/grey/small/address1.pngPôle 
> Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France
>
> https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/apps/linkedin_connect.png[linkedin.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.linkedin.com_in_fredericguillemaut_&d=DwMD-g&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=mBQzlSaM6eYCHFBU-v48zs-QSrjHB0aWmHuE4X4drzI&m=6awHkyadr47OkIv9ngUsnw5lUPKPqKUgHLxqO0WPS_A&s=-47msz3Z8Eb2lXSeT6qMf1kLR1jV3EIwHY82RL94AhM&e=>
>
>
> N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie 
> privée vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive 
> d'envoyer en dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de 
> réponse immédiate.
>

-- 
photo 		
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/> 
<http://twitter.com/safebrands>
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands

Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07 
<tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22 
<tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27 
<tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
Skype: mailclub1 <#>
www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France

<https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>

N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée 
vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en 
dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20180129/868ba084/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-ssc mailing list