[Gnso-ssc] Reminder: Proposed SSC charter revisions - items for discussion
Frédéric Guillemaut - SafeBrands
fg at safebrands.com
Thu Mar 1 09:49:54 UTC 2018
Hello
I am fine with the comments, and the way to keep information
confidential, suggested by Marika,
I would favor starting the terms for the team after the charter is
validated,
Best regards
Frederic
Le 28/02/2018 à 18:36, Emily Barabas a écrit :
>
> Dear SSC members,
>
> As a reminder, your input is encouraged on the items below regarding
> proposed SSC charter revisions.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
> *From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday 20 February 2018 at 21:21
> *To: *"gnso-ssc at icann.org" <gnso-ssc at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Proposed SSC charter revisions - items for discussion
>
> Dear SSC members,
>
> On the last SSC call, members reviewed proposed revisions to the SSC
> charter, which were drafted in response to comments received here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c0NllDbjSFap0KR9s61a8uXJoH78FqLtBTOgahLVeLQ/edit.
> The latest version of the proposed charter revisionsare attached.
>
> Several items were identified for further discussion over the mailing
> list. Your input is kindly requested on the mailing list regarding the
> following items:
>
> * The section of the charter on Transparency currently states:
> “Unless otherwise directed by the GNSO Council, the names of all
> applicants and all documents received during the selection process
> shall be considered public and published on the GNSO web-site or
> other ICANN web-site. To facilitate its deliberations, the SSC may
> decide to conduct some or all of its deliberations in private, but
> if so, it is expected to provide a rationale with its
> recommendations.” Some SSC members have suggested that the SSC
> should conduct deliberations privately by default, publishing
> emails sent to the mailing list, meeting notes, call recordings,
> and other materials relevant to a selection process only after the
> selection process has been completed. Do members support proposing
> this change to the charter? Another suggestion made by an SSC
> member was to continue the current practices regarding
> transparency but add disclaimer text to the SSC wiki indicating
> that all SSC recommendations are subject to GNSO Council approval.
> Are there additional proposals that SSC members would like to make?
>
>
> o On the last call, some SSC members raised questions about how
> the NomCom operates with respect to confidentiality of
> deliberations, noting that the NomCom is also a body that
> conducts selection processes for positions within ICANN.
> According the NomCom Operating Procedures
> (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/nomcom2018-procedures-2017-12-15-en#A4),
> the NomCom keeps all deliberations confidential throughout the
> selection process and continues to keep this information
> confidential after the selection process is complete. This is
> a higher level of confidentiality than SSC members have
> proposed for the SSC.
>
>
> o Staff has investigated options for enabling the SSC to delay
> public posting of materials, including email and call records
> and other documentation, until after deliberations for an
> appointment are complete. While administratively more
> complicated than the current setup, this is possible from a
> technical perspective.
>
>
> * Under Review Team Appointment Principles, proposed text for bullet
> 8 included the following text: “The level of consensus reached by
> the SSC on the selected candidates will also be communicated [to
> the GNSO Council] as well as any minority views, should these
> exist.” Do SSC members think that it is appropriate to keep the
> text “as well as any minority views, should these exist” given
> that the SSC operates by full consensus? Should this text be
> clarified to state that the SSC should communicate minority views
> only if consensus is not possible to reach?
>
>
> * The same bullet 8 states: “The SSC shall notify candidates of its
> recommendations to the GNSO Council at the same time that it
> notifies the GNSO Council of its recommendations, making clear
> that the recommendations are subject to GNSO Council
> consideration.”Is the SSC comfortable with beginning to implement
> this new step after the GNSO Council approves the revised charter
> (as opposed to sooner)?
>
> Thanks in advance for your input on these items.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
> *Emily Barabas *| Senior Policy Specialist
>
> *ICANN*| Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
>
> Email: emily.barabas at icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
--
photo
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>
<http://twitter.com/safebrands>
Frédéric Guillemaut
Directeur Associé, SafeBrands
Direct : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 07
<tel:Direct%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2007>
France : +33 (0)4 88 66 22 22
<tel:France%20:%20+33%20%280%294%2088%2066%2022%2022>
Mobile : +33 (0)6 81 29 81 27
<tel:Mobile%20:%20+33%20%280%296%2081%2029%2081%2027>
fg at safebrands.com <mailto:fg at safebrands.com>
Skype: mailclub1 <#>
www.safebrands.com <http://www.safebrands.com>
Pôle Média de la Belle de Mai • 37 rue Guibal • 13003 Marseille • France
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/fredericguillemaut/>
N.B : En application des principes de respect de l'équilibre vie privée
vie professionnelle à SafeBrands, les mails qu'il m'arrive d'envoyer en
dehors des heures ou jours ouvrables n'appellent pas de réponse immédiate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ssc/attachments/20180301/38818795/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ssc
mailing list