[Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: Draft poll - GNSO Nominated Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program

[Emily Barabas]

Hi Maxim,

Would it address the concern to change question 3 to state:

"Based on the candidate's materials and your own personal experience if applicable, do you think that the candidate has the experience, skills, and attributes necessary to serve as the GNSO as a GNSO nominated mentor?" (Replace the term "represent" with "serve as")

Staff has added an additional text boxes to provide more space for comments, although please note that there will be an opportunity to comment on the specific qualifications of the candidates during the call where the EOIs are discussed. Please see the survey preview.

Kind regards,
Emily

On 15/12/2020, 15:18, "Maxim Alzoba" <m.alzoba at gmail.com> wrote:

    Hello Emily,

    I think we need to make some small edit of 3.

    Mentors do not have powers to speak on behalf of GNSO, so it is not a representative. We need to correct the text so it reversed to show that the person is able to present the structure and legal framework around GNSO, plus description of bodies composing GNSO, so fellows could understand, where to apply their experience and desire to participate in the community work.

    For skills and experience please add other text boxes (too many items with the single yes or no does not allow to cover situations where there is a concern about a particular bit)

    ⁣Maxim Alzoba​

    On 15 Dec 2020, 10:18, at 10:18, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org> wrote:
    >Dear SSC members,
    >
    >As discussed on yesterday’s call, staff has prepared a draft poll for
    >SSC members to use to organize their thoughts on candidates for the
    >GNSO Nominated Mentor for the ICANN Fellowship Program position. You
    >can preview the draft poll here:
    >https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Preview/?sm=q0W8LHQ3244cgfWI7sPta_2BYESjkF6CX820DUQodoZKTcZHKb1ChL9Bbgv87EvO_2Fc__;!!PtGJab4!rqIU2d9fyDD0MRU-tAWisbXg3BkO7U8rQ5goT50gqV5WdzoTsJvIr5TicwzXcaP6RLJQPUXGdA$ .
    >You will note that question four asks respondents to rank the
    >candidates. This question can be removed if only a single application
    >is received by Thursday’s deadline. If you have any concerns about the
    >format of the poll, please respond on the mailing list no later than 17
    >December.
    >
    >Kind regards,
    >Emily
    >
    >Emily Barabas
    >Policy Manager, GNSO Policy Development Support
    >Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
    >Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976
    >https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.icann.org__;!!PtGJab4!rqIU2d9fyDD0MRU-tAWisbXg3BkO7U8rQ5goT50gqV5WdzoTsJvIr5TicwzXcaP6RLK3OWXDxw$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.icann.org/__;!!PtGJab4!rqIU2d9fyDD0MRU-tAWisbXg3BkO7U8rQ5goT50gqV5WdzoTsJvIr5TicwzXcaP6RLKg1ebFAA$ >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >_______________________________________________
    >Gnso-ssc mailing list
    >Gnso-ssc at icann.org
    >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
    >_______________________________________________
    >By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
    >personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list
    >accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
    >(https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!rqIU2d9fyDD0MRU-tAWisbXg3BkO7U8rQ5goT50gqV5WdzoTsJvIr5TicwzXcaP6RLK-P7v5Yw$ ) and the website Terms of Service
    >(https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!rqIU2d9fyDD0MRU-tAWisbXg3BkO7U8rQ5goT50gqV5WdzoTsJvIr5TicwzXcaP6RLJD1aSiFg$ ). You can visit the Mailman link
    >above to change your membership status or configuration, including
    >unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery
    >altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.