[Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Draft principles - comments

[Tom Barrett]

It would be helpful for me to see how group members would apply the P&I
principles to two real-life situations.  For background info, see
domainincite.com.

 

1. How to resolve the .islam and .halal TLDs.

According to domainincite, "ICANN is going to have to decide whether to
approve the new gTLDs .islam and .halal, after the Governmental Advisory
Committee punted the issue."

2.  The proposal from the Brand Registry Group regarding dotbrand rules.

According to domainincite, "The proposed changes were negotiated by ICANN
and the Brand Registry Group, a coalition of dot-brand applicants that one
day plans to become a formal part of ICANN's policy-making structure."

I would be interested in hearing how others would frame these two
situations:

 

a.       How would you apply the P&I principles for these two items?  

 

b.      When (if at all) should the GNSO participate in these two items?
Why or why not?

c.       Regarding the dotbrand rules: Was this "call for public comment" by
ICANN the appropriate next step for the BRG proposal?  Why or why not?

 

 

 

Thomas Barrett

EnCirca, Inc.  - President

400 West Cummings Park, #1725

Woburn, MA US 01801

+1.781.942.9975 ext: 11

+1.781.823.8911 (fax)

+1.781.492.1315 (cell)

 

From: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika
Konings
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 7:46 AM
To: gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl at icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl] Draft principles - comments

 

To kick things off, I've added a couple of comments / questions as well as
proposed edits to the draft provided by Chuck (see attached).

 

Best regards,

 

Marika

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-subteam0b-policyimpl/attachments/20131209/a78c542e/attachment.html>