[GNSO-TPR] Proposed agenda for meeting #47 on Tuesday 17 May 2022 at 16:00 UTC

Mike Rodenbaugh mike at rodenbaugh.com
Wed Jun 1 16:44:21 UTC 2022


Hi all, unfortunately I have been unable to make the last few calls due to
litigation matters.  I should make it next week and certainly to the F2F in
Den Haag.

Meanwhile, Roger very helpfully summarized for me the discussion on the two
issues IPC has flagged.  We understand there is no movement on Rec 12 and
can live with that, with thanks for further explanation from Roger.

As to Rec 19, we understand the WG seems coalesced around alternative
language that the IPC will support, again with many thanks for considering
our concern:


   -

   Evidence of fraud or violation of registrar’s domain use or anti-abuse
   policies (emphasis added) (note: this textual addition was suggested by
   an ICANN org colleague, and seemed to receive the support of the WG)


Thank you all,
Mike

[image: Logo]

Mike Rodenbaugh

address:

548 Market Street, Box 55819

San Francisco, CA 94104

email:

mike at rodenbaugh.com

phone:

+1 (415) 738-8087


On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 1:07 PM Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com> wrote:

> Apologies I cannot make the call tomorrow as I have to be in court with a
> client.
>
> We in the IPC also wanted to Flag Reco #12 for further discussion:
>
>
>    - Rec. 12 (line 822 of report) – five calendar days, or 120 hours as
>    stated in the report, is too long to wait for a TAC.  While most registrars
>    give this to you instantly or within minutes, we wouldn’t want to wait five
>    days if the matter was urgent and a registrar had that kind of time
>    latitude.  We’d strongly prefer a 1-2 calendar day maximum.
>
>
> Re Rec #19, we continue to believe that since the stated intention is to
> have guardrails, that we should recommend that definitional language and
> not leave it up to later implementation and/or unfettered registrar
> discretion.
>
> I can make the call next week to further discuss., or here on the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> [image: Logo]
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
>
> address:
>
> 548 Market Street, Box 55819
>
> San Francisco, CA 94104
>
> email:
>
> mike at rodenbaugh.com
>
> phone:
>
> +1 (415) 738-8087
>
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 2:10 PM Caitlin Tubergen <
> caitlin.tubergen at icann.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear Working Group members,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next meeting scheduled to
>> take place on Tuesday, 17 May 2022 at 16:00 UTC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Emily, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin
>>
>>
>>
>> *Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #47*
>>
>> *Proposed Agenda*
>>
>> *17 May 2022*
>>
>>
>>
>>    1. Roll Call & SOI updates
>>    2. Welcome and Chair Updates
>>    3. Return to items in the preliminary recommendations flagged for
>>    further discussion during last week’s call (see here
>>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clAqB1wBeOf9ZC5RMMxKrrUTs3N2WyaVYTIyVy_ODs4/edit>
>>    )
>>       1. Recommendation 7
>>          2. Recommendation 9.2
>>          3. Recommendation 13.1
>>          4. Recommendation 13.2
>>       4. Discussion of Recommendation 19 email thread (please see here
>>    <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/2022-May/000449.html>)
>>    5. Begin review of items flagged in Proposed Revisions from Working
>>    Group members
>>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s9xumJ1XBPdTb7kQmc5sAC2AkszvfAF0freMvnx6G18/edit>
>>    document (if any)
>>    6. AOB
>>       1. Next call: Tuesday 24 May 2022 at 16:00 UTC
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNSO-TPR mailing list
>> GNSO-TPR at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20220601/e5c32d23/attachment.html>


More information about the GNSO-TPR mailing list