[GNSO-TPR] Proposed Agenda: TPR WG Meeting #94 - 6 June 2023

Caitlin Tubergen caitlin.tubergen at icann.org
Mon Jun 5 14:12:53 UTC 2023

Dear Working Group members,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next meeting scheduled to take place on Tuesday, 6 June at 16:00 UTC.

As a reminder, here are the homework items from last week’s meeting:


  1.  Charter Question g3: WG members to suggest additional use cases for registrant transfer dispute mechanism.
  2.  Charter Questions g4 and g5:WG members to review the redlined Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy with Rec. 27 updates at:https://docs.google.com/document/d/12ncsCc_sYiBs2cRZVOPCrBes92aV0p-6S-7hNBkmM9w/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/12ncsCc_sYiBs2cRZVOPCrBes92aV0p-6S-7hNBkmM9w/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!7Ot2LPkXsbvOonxll20j8M6xlp4ezanDTMRdxXdv0E8Nm4uv6dTVKIYYKlx8N_0bfKB8jc39MM_5qVJZDo0v5XmYdfH7ybGZaRc$> and note anything that might be missing or require clarification. Specifically, are there any red flags for the data elements or documentary evidence in the TDRP? NOTE: The document is set for editing – please use suggestion mode so that changes are highlighted.

Kind regards,

Emily, Julie, Berry, and Caitlin

Transfer Policy Review - Meeting #94
Proposed Agenda
6 June 2023
1. Welcome and Chair updates
2. Recap Outcomes - Last Week’s Call
3. Additional Use Cases Charter Question g3 (draft scenarios)

•                     Use Cases from IRTP D Final Report<https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_46639/irtp-d-final-25sep14-en.pdf>, please see pp. 41-42

     *   Two registrant claimants dispute to be the Registered Name Holder immediately prior to or directly following an inter-registrar transfer (entirely b/w registrants; no compliance role)
     *   Two registrant claimants dispute who is the Registered Name Holder of a domain name without an inter-registrant transfer having taken place. There are a number of reasons for such a situation to occur, including – but not limited to – a contractor registering a domain for a client, two business partners splitting, admin contact leave a company but remains listed in the Whois database. (entirely b/w registrants; no compliance role)
     *   Any other use cases from the WG that need to be considered?
4. Charter Question g4

•                    WG discussion re: homework

5. Charter Question g5

•                     WG discussion re: homework
6. Planning for ICANN77
7. AOB

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-tpr/attachments/20230605/68cc9114/attachment.html>

More information about the GNSO-TPR mailing list