<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Verdana;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:"Courier New";}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-CA link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Hi Steinar,</p><p class=MsoNormal><br>Thanks for sharing this! Did the ALAC team discuss any reasoning that you could pass on to us, so we can understand their concerns and objectives? </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Thanks, </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>-- <o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><b><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>Sarah Wyld</span></b><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>, CIPP/E<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>Policy & Privacy Manager<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>Pronouns: she/her<o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'><a href="mailto:swyld@tucows.com">swyld@tucows.com</a> <o:p></o:p></span></pre><pre><span style='font-family:"Verdana",sans-serif'>+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392<o:p></o:p></span></pre><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New"'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><img border=0 width=100 height=22 style='width:1.0416in;height:.2239in' id="Picture_x0020_3" src="cid:image001.png@01D698B1.25CB4480"><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0cm'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:steinar@recito.no">Steinar Grøtterød</a><br><b>Sent: </b>August 17, 2021 3:09 AM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:gnso-tpr@icann.org">Roger D Carney via GNSO-TPR</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:cpwg@icann.org">ICANN At-Large Staff via CPWG</a><br><b>Subject: </b>[GNSO-TPR] ALAC input to the Losing FOA discussion</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Transfer Policy Review PDP members,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The ALAC / At-Large members of the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG have continuously informed the Consolidated Policy Working Group (CPWG) of the work being done by the PDP working group. On the charter questions connected to the Losing Form of Authorization (FOA), the ALAC view is:</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>* ALAC recommend that the Losing Form of Authorization should still be mandatory in the reviewed transfer policy.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The CPWG has also discussed the option to make the Losing FOA optional. The majority of the CPWG members did not favor this alternative.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Regards,</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Steinar Grøtterød</p><p class=MsoNormal>At-Large member of the Transfer Policy Review PDP WG</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________</p><p class=MsoNormal>GNSO-TPR mailing list</p><p class=MsoNormal>GNSO-TPR@icann.org</p><p class=MsoNormal>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-tpr</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>