[gtld-tech] Second version of the URS High Level Technical Requirements for Registries and Registrars

[Kal Feher]

Gustavo,
Under what circumstances would a name transition from URS Suspension to URS Lock? I am referring to your Note under the definition of URS Lock.

I've reviewed both the technical and non-technical requirements and neither explain when this would occur.

Also will there be further detail on how URS interacts with other processes, such as UDRP?

Kal Feher
Enterprise Architect
ARI Registry Services

From: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Gustavo Lozano
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2013 7:23 AM
To: gtld-tech at icann.org
Subject: [gtld-tech] Second version of the URS High Level Technical Requirements for Registries and Registrars

Colleagues,

Attached you will find the second version of the "URS High Level Technical Requirements for Registries and Registrars" and a redline version of the document.

This second version incorporates the feedback obtained from the conference call on August 07.

We appreciate your feedback. Please send your feedback to the list or in private.

Based on the feedback in this list, a new conference call may be required or this version may be published as the final version.

Registry Operators will know the name servers deployed by the URS providers soon, in order to allow Registry Operators to create host objects (if necessary).

Thank you,
Gustavo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20130830/04a7a48e/attachment.html>