[gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars

Francisco Arias francisco.arias at icann.org
Mon Jan 11 21:59:58 UTC 2016

On 1/9/16, 6:40 AM, "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck at verisign.com> wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org On Behalf Of Francisco Arias
>> Sent: Friday, January 08, 2016 6:53 PM
>> To: Andrew Newton; Gannon, James-1
>> Cc: gtld-tech at icann.org
>> Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Draft RDAP Operational Profile for gTLD
>> Registries and Registrars
>> I think there is perhaps a misunderstanding. The current profile
>> proposal does support/allow for tiered access, as long as an agreement
>> provision, waiver, or Consensus Policy supports/allows such thing (see
>> section 1.4.11 of the proposal).
>Francisco, how many gTLDs have such provisions in place? 

Scott, there are three gTLDs (.cat, .name, and .tel) with tiered-access provisions as described in the public comment landing page for the gTLD RDAP profile at https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rdap-profile-2015-12-03-en.

>Will those that do not be able to defer implementation until the needed "agreement provision,
>waiver, or Consensus Policy" terms are in place?

I don’t understand this, could you elaborate?



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4564 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20160111/9c4ffc6b/smime.p7s>

More information about the gtld-tech mailing list