[gtld-tech] EPDP recommendations and EPP

[Gould, James]

I believe there are many technical alternatives available for us to meet the policy.  The need for a standards-track RFC is an open question.  
  
—
 
JG



James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgould at Verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> 

On 2/27/19, 8:28 AM, "gtld-tech on behalf of Gavin Brown" <gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org on behalf of gavin.brown at centralnic.com> wrote:

    On 27/02/2019 10:10, Mario Loffredo wrote:
    > Hi Gavin,
    > 
    > Il 27/02/2019 10:40, Gavin Brown ha scritto:
    >>
    >> [snip]
    >>
    >> Any thoughts?
    > 
    > Make RFC5733 <addr> element optional.
    
    That would require a standards-track RFC, and since it would result in
    an XML schema update, probably a namespace version update as well (i.e.
    urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:contact-1.0 => urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:contact-1.0
    => urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:contact-1.1).
    
    G.
    
    -- 
    Gavin Brown
    Chief Technology Officer
    CentralNic Group plc (LSE:CNIC)
    Innovative, Reliable and Flexible Registry Services
    for ccTLD, gTLD and private domain name registries
    https://www.centralnic.com/
    +44.7548243029
    
    CentralNic Group plc is a company registered in England and Wales with
    company number 8576358. Registered Offices: 35-39 Moorgate, London,
    EC2R 6AR.