[ICANN Academy WG] Draft outline for a Pilot Leadership Training Programme in Toronto

Fri Aug 24 10:22:24 UTC 2012

Thanks for the questions and answers, both of which are informative. The
following form does help me understand who will be the participants. Have
they been informed? I assume the Chairs like all others may have booked
their travel already.

Then, sorry for my ignorance. What is the meaning of " *Nominations for
participants should be sent to **filiz.yilmaz at icann.org **until 1 September
2012* "? Who can nominate the participants? Aren't they the Chairs listed
below? Does it mean that a Chair could "nominate" a proxy if she/he is not
available?

Since there is only a few days left, I would be grateful if I could get the
answer so as to pass on to my group.

Hong

> *Overview of participants in Toronto:*
>
> ** **
>
> *Group / function*
>
> *Number of seats:*
>
> *Description*
>
> New President / CEO****
>
> 1****
>
> Fadi Chehadé****
>
> NomCom elections****
>
> 7****
>
> 3 ICANN Board, 1 GNSO, 1 ccNSO, 2 ALAC****
>
> Board Member****
>
> 1****
>
> Proposed: Bertrand de la Chapelle [tbc] ****
>
> All SO/AC/SG Chairs [1] <#13953ecb75e05084__ftn1>****
>
> 16****
>
> Proposed: Current or incoming chairs ****
>
> ICANN Academy WG Chair****
>
> 1****
>
> Sandra Hoferichter****
>
> Staff****
>
> 6****
>
> 1 for logistical Support, 5 as speakers (see curriculum) ****
>
> *Total*
>
> *32**[2] <#13953ecb75e05084__ftn2>*
>
> * *
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [1] <#13953ecb75e05084__ftnref1> Chair of: GNSO, CcNSO, ASO, Commercial
> and Business Users Constituency (CBUC officially and BC for short) Non
> Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Internet Service Providers and
> Connectivity Providers Constituency (ISPCP), Intellectual Property
> Interests Constituency (IPC), Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG), Registry
> Stakeholder Group (RySG), Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG), Non-For-Profit
> Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC), GAC, RSSAC, SSAC, ALAC, NomCom**
> **
>
> ** **
>
> [2] <#13953ecb75e05084__ftnref2> 21 of the participants' accommodation
> (expect Board and Staff members) will be funded for two nights (11-12
> October 2012) from the pilot program budget.****
>
> *
> *
>
> *
> *
>
> *
> *
>
> Sandra - Do I understand you correctly that the session as currently
> planned is designed mostly for experienced ICANN leaders, except possibly
> for any inexperienced NomCom appointees?****
>
> ** **
>
> As everyone knows, it is critical to clearly understand the audience
> before finalizing the curriculum.****
>
> ** **
>
> Chuck****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* sandra hoferichter [mailto:info at hoferichter.eu<info at hoferichter.eu>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:51 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck
> *Cc:* at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [ICANN Academy WG] Draft outline for a Pilot Leadership
> Training Programme in Toronto****
>
> ** **
>
> Dear Chuck,****
>
> ** **
>
> prospective leaders WITHOUT ICANN experience should attend the Newcomers
> programme first, which gives a good overview before going into the deep of
> a leadership programme. Saying that I am aware that such participants will
> also be elected by the NomCom and be part of the programme as currently
> listed. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Furthermore I follow the discussion on this list with joy and will come up
> with a proposal how to work on an improved  curriculum once back from the
> ICANN Studienkreis, I am currently attending in Oslo. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Filiz stated already that the input of this WG will be considered and we
> should think about how to organise this process. ****
>
>
> Best Sandra****
>
> ** **
>
> (Note: This message was send from my iPhone - I do apologise for any
> misspelling.)****
>
>
> Am 23.08.2012 um 15:05 schrieb "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>:****
>
> Thanks for the response Sandra.  It would help me if I could get an answer
> to my question: "If all 32 of the leaders accept the invitation, how many
> seats would be left for prospective or new leaders without ICANN
> experience? "****
>
>  ****
>
> Chuck****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* sandra hoferichter [mailto:info at hoferichter.eu<info at hoferichter.eu>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 23, 2012 2:27 AM
> *To:* Gomes, Chuck; at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* AW: [ICANN Academy WG] Draft outline for a Pilot Leadership
> Training Programme in Toronto****
>
>  ****
>
> Dear Chuck,****
>
>  ****
>
> thank you for your comments and taking the time looking at the document. I
> will answer on some of your remarks.****
>
>  ****
>
> New or prospective leaders without any ICANN should attend the Newcomers
> programme first. This leadership training programme is supposed to be an
> advanced training for experienced leader, going deeper into the discussion
> and the function of ICANN and in particular the stakeholder groups. It came
> up, that also for experienced ICANN activists, the organisation offers
> surprises, while changing between the SO / AC for example. Furthermore we
> don't yet the names of the NomCom elections, but we know that this
> committee often brings in new leaders into the organisation, which need an
> advanced training too. However I agree there are some people among us which
> do not need an training any more, because they helped building the
> organisation, those should offer the seat to a future leader from their
> group.****
>
>  ****
>
> From your comments (and also Avri's comments) I understand, this is not
> very clear in the curriculum and we are inviting you to propose adjustments.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Best Regards****
>
>  ****
>
> Sandra****
>
>  ****
>
> *Von:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com <cgomes at verisign.com>]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 22. August 2012 23:18
> *An:* sandra hoferichter; at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
> *Betreff:* RE: [ICANN Academy WG] Draft outline for a Pilot Leadership
> Training Programme in Toronto****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks for the work that went into this.****
>
>  ****
>
> I may be missing something regarding the target audience but it looks
> predominantly like ICANN participants who do not need the training.  Of the
> listed potential participants, I doubt that there are less than a handful
> that would get much if any benefit from the curriculum proposed.  Moreover,
> it shouldn't be assumed that a new leader needs this training; I would
> think it is reasonable to expect that most ICANN groups will elect new
> leaders who are experienced in the ICANN community so they shouldn't need
> most of the training that is outlined.****
>
>  ****
>
> If all 32 of the leaders accept the invitation, how many seats would be
> left for prospective or new leaders without ICANN experience?  The leaders
> would hopefully be good trainers, but if the majority of those
> participating are trainers and the costs go to support them, the value of
> this exercise seems pretty limited.****
>
>  ****
>
> I fully appreciate the value of networking that will occur in a setting
> like this but if that is the main value, $40,000 and two full days doesn't
> seem like a good use of money and time.  Nor would it provide a very good
> pilot effort.****
>
>  ****
>
> Please correct me if I am interpreting this incorrectly.****
>
>  ****
>
> Chuck****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [
> mailto:at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org<at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>]
> *On Behalf Of *sandra hoferichter
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:22 AM
> *To:* at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at icann.org
> *Subject:* [ICANN Academy WG] Draft outline for a Pilot Leadership
> Training Programme in Toronto****
>
>  ****
>
> Dear WG members,****
>
>  ****
>
> after a summer break Filiz and I started working on a draft outline for
> the pilot project in Toronto. Based on the FY13 Operating Plan and Budget
> and the results of this working group so far, we present you herewith a
> draft programme inviting you to comment. ****
>
>  ****
>
> While drafting this outline we already discussed various options, how to
> optimise it and what should be the focus. We expect that some of these
> options will be raised in this mailing list and we are happy to answer any
> questions and remain open for ideas, as long as they fit in the given
> framework.****
>
>  ****
>
> In the FY13 Operating Plan and Budget document it is stated:****
>
>  ****
>
> *<<<"The ICANN-Academy concept is still being developed and reviewed
> within the SO-AC groups and further consensus is ongoing though a process
> led by ALAC / At-Large. While this process is ongoing, in early
> anticipation of the direction of the effort, a staff pilot project will be
> focused on the executive training of new SO-AC leaders on ICANN
> organisations, policymaking and related activities. The pilot would include
> usage of online tools where possible and an orientation session in Toronto.
> This pilot project should be seen as a first step in testing the overall
> concept and providing a basis for a future training program as well as
> experience to build on for future improvements if deemed necessary. ">>>**
> ***
>
>  ****
>
> Furthermore this draft concept is based on the proposed curriculum. (see:
> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/31168402/Draft+Initial+Proposal+%28as+of+18.02.2012%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1329954389000).
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> *The comment phase is open until: 31 August 2012*****
>
> *Nominations for participants should be sent to **filiz.yilmaz at icann.org**until
> 1 September 2012*****
>
>  ****
>
> We are aware, that the discussion in the expanded WG is just about to
> start and this outline will not cover all the needs and ideas, however this
> pilot project should be see as a first step to build on an inclusive
> capacity building programme within ICANN. The WG is should review the pilot
> project critically and develop strategies and recommendations for future
> projects. To get a feedback from the participants this WG is asked to
> develop a survey, to be filled in by every participant in this programme.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> We are looking forward to your comments.****
>
>  ****
>
> Sandra and Filiz****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg mailing list
> at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large-icann-academy-ad-hoc-wg
>
>

-- 
Professor Dr. Hong Xue
Director of Institute for the Internet Policy & Law (IIPL)
Beijing Normal University
http://www.iipl.org.cn/
19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street
Beijing 100875 China
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/icann-academy-wg/attachments/20120824/fafd0672/attachment.html>