From patrick at vande-walle.eu Thu Apr 23 06:01:45 2009 From: patrick at vande-walle.eu (Patrick Vande Walle) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:01:45 +0200 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Fwd: Proposal: At-Large comments on last PSC document Message-ID: <58491cdfaf076ccfee2e2221ed9e1bc7@localhost> Thanks S?bastien, I have CCed the IPv6 and DNS security WGsto get their opinion. Right now, my first personal comment regarding point 5.3 in the IIC document would be along these lines. I am sure it needs redrafting to suit the diplomatic wording used in ICANN. And I am pretty sure my colleagues on the IPv6 and DNS side may disagree. But I hope it will help spark the discussion. [RECOMMENDATION 5.3 ICANN should be a discussion leader and raise awareness of issues linked to stability and security of the Internet] [5.3.1 ICANN should further define and strengthen its role in relation to security and stability of the unique identifiers and their impact on the Internet.] [5.3.2 ICANN's strategic and operational planning should involve the organization in interaction with key organizations responsible for security related protocols and standards.] While the At-Large (ALAC) supports these recommendations, it expects ICANN to be much more than just a discussion leader and awareness raiser. As the current state of the deployment of DNSSEC and IPv6 demonstrate, the unorganized spreading of responsibilities between informal groups and regional entities with no real leadership, has led to a very low adoption rate of these technologies, although the standards have been there for more than 10 years. We call ICANN to identify the best practices used in other industries like the automotive or aviation ones. A master plan with clear milestones and deadlines needs to be drafted and implemented with the help of relevant organizations. Obviously, the role of ICANN with regard to new technologies related to the unique identifiers on the Internet does not end with a software and network update of the L root server. As long as these technologies are not being deployed down to the end user premises, they are pretty useless. With a depreciation cycle of an average of 5 years for general hardware and software related to the use of the Internet, a much more aggressive timeline could be drafted for the introduction of new technologies. ICANN should take the leadership on these efforts. Patrick -------- Original Message -------- Proposal: At-Large comments on last PSC document Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:14:48 +0200 S?bastien Bachollet Dear Working-group members, Following my mail on March the 27, I would like you to ask you to react on proposed comments on the last document from the PSC. Thanks to Seth for his help. I copy the leaders of the "Trans-account" WG (ex-Summit Working Group 4) tasked to address "ICANN Transparency and Accountability" and of the "DNS-security" WG (ex- Summit Working Group 5) tasked to address "DNS Security Issues within ICANN's Remit". If you want to forward to your WG, it is OK. Maybe we will need to have a common meeting of the 3 WG to finalize an At-Large (ALAC) position. Thanks for advices All the best PS: If staff can help (me-us) to have a place to work on that document it will be great. PS2: I am leaving for 2 weeks with non Internet connection. SBASTIEN BACHOLLET PRSIDENT D'HONNEUR - ISOC FRANCE SEBASTIEN.BACHOLLET at ISOC.FR [1] WWW.EGENI.ORG [2] WWW.ISOC.FR [3] DE : icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] DE LA PART DE S?bastien Bachollet ENVOY : vendredi 27 mars 2009 20:20 : icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org OBJET : [Icann-future-wg] Some documents and link Hello, Please find attached the last version of the WG2 declaration in English and in French (I hope Spanish in on the way). And the link to the last document from the President's Strategy Committee http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/draft-iic-implementation-26feb09-en.pdf [4] I think it is important we start to work on analyzing this last version and to see if we can incorporate some idea to our declaration before the end of the comment period (Closed: 11 May 09). I hope that a specific space will be setup and bring to us in a very near future. I hope that we will be able to build on our very good work done during the Summit in the Mexico Icann meeting. http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/ [5] All the best SBASTIEN BACHOLLET PRSIDENT D'HONNEUR - ISOC FRANCE SEBASTIEN.BACHOLLET at ISOC.FR [6] WWW.EGENI.ORG [7] WWW.ISOC.FR [8] Blog: http://patrick.vande-walle.eu Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickvw Identica: http://identi.ca/patrickv Links: ------ [1] mailto:sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr [2] http://www.egeni.org/ [3] http://www.isoc.fr/ [4] http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/draft-iic-implementation-26feb09-en.pdf [5] http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/ [6] mailto:sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr [7] http://www.egeni.org/ [8] http://www.isoc.fr/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20090423/e6586ffa/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WG_ALAC_PSC_V1.rtf Type: application/msword Size: 219124 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20090423/e6586ffa/WG_ALAC_PSC_V1.rtf From sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr Thu Apr 23 15:41:11 2009 From: sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bachollet?=) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:41:11 +0200 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Proposal: At-Large comments on last PSC document Message-ID: <016101c9c429$edd6a460$c983ed20$@bachollet@isoc.fr> Dear Working-group members, Following my mail on March the 27, I would like you to ask you to react on proposed comments on the last document from the PSC. Thanks to Seth for his help. I copy the leaders of the ?Trans-account? WG (ex-Summit Working Group 4) tasked to address ?ICANN Transparency and Accountability? and of the ?DNS-security? WG (ex- Summit Working Group 5) tasked to address ?DNS Security Issues within ICANN's Remit?. If you want to forward to your WG, it is OK. Maybe we will need to have a common meeting of the 3 WG to finalize an At-Large (ALAC) position. Thanks for advices All the best PS: If staff can help (me-us) to have a place to work on that document it will be great. PS2: I am leaving for 2 weeks with non Internet connection. S?bastien Bachollet Pr?sident d'honneur - Isoc France sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr De : icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de S?bastien Bachollet Envoy? : vendredi 27 mars 2009 20:20 ? : icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org Objet : [Icann-future-wg] Some documents and link Hello, Please find attached the last version of the WG2 declaration in English and in French (I hope Spanish in on the way). And the link to the last document from the President?s Strategy Committee http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/draft-iic-implementation-26feb09-en.pdf I think it is important we start to work on analyzing this last version and to see if we can incorporate some idea to our declaration before the end of the comment period (Closed: 11 May 09). I hope that a specific space will be setup and bring to us in a very near future. I hope that we will be able to build on our very good work done during the Summit in the Mexico Icann meeting. http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/ All the best S?bastien Bachollet Pr?sident d'honneur - Isoc France sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20090423/20c35e66/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: WG_ALAC_PSC_V1.rtf Type: application/msword Size: 219124 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20090423/20c35e66/WG_ALAC_PSC_V1.rtf