From staff at atlarge.icann.org Wed Nov 18 16:39:00 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (ICANN At-Large Staff) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:39:00 -0800 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Deadline approaching for Public Consultation on NomCom Review Report Message-ID: Dear Chairs of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Governance of ICANN, We would like to inform you that the deadline for the public consultation on the NomCom Review ? Draft Working Group Report is this coming Sunday, 22 November 2009. You can find detailed information on this consultation under: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200911.html#nomcom-review-2009 Explanation/Background: In June 2007 Interisle Consulting Group was contracted to undertake the external review of the Nominating Committee, and delivered their report in October of the same year. Following public comments , the NomCom Review WG presented a report to the Board Governance Committee (BGC), at that time responsible for the oversight of the Organizational Review function. The BGC considered that recommendations from the NomCom review process had to be analysed in coordination with the findings of other reviews that at the time of delivery of the report were ongoing. Consequently, the NomCom review WG report was not published for public comments. More recently ? and towards the conclusion of other interlinked review processes? the Structural Improvements Committee (SIC) ? which in the meantime took over the duty of coordinating the Organizational Review processes ? considered that findings and conclusions of the Working Group report needed to be consolidated and updated before publication for public comments. To this end, a specific NomCom Review Finalization Working Group was tasked with the duty to update the conclusions and recommendations of the original NomCom review WG report. In order to fulfill its mandate, the WG reviewed relevant documents, and consulted intensively with NomCom Chairs of the period of 2006 to 2009, with supporting staff, and with General Counsel. The NomCom Review Finalization Working Group issues now for presentation at the Seoul meeting and for public comment its draft report [PDF, 276K] The full At-Large Policy Advice Schedule is available under: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091118/202d922e/attachment.html From staff at atlarge.icann.org Wed Nov 18 16:42:01 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (ICANN At-Large Staff) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:42:01 -0800 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Deadline for Public Consultation on Board Review WG Report approaching Message-ID: Dear Chairs of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Governance of ICANN, We would like to inform you that the deadline for the public consultation on the Board Review ? Draft Final Working Group Report is this coming Sunday, 22 November 2009. You can find detailed information on this consultation under: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 The full At-Large Policy Advice Schedule is available under: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar Explanation/Background: ICANN appointed the Boston Consulting Group/Colin Carter & Associates to perform the external review of its Board of Directors; their review report was presented during a public workshop at the ICANN meeting in Cairo and a public comment period followed. The Board review WG, considering the Independent Reviewer's final report, Board input, and comments from stakeholders and the public, issued an Interim Report for consultation with the Community , which was presented at the ICANN meeting in Mexico City. During the following public comment period further inputs were received from interested parties. A second interim report was then issued and presented at the ICANN meeting in Sydney. Comments received during its presentation and during the following public comments phase helped the Board review WG to conclude its analysis of the few issues that were still outstanding; the WG releases now its draft final report [PDF, 132K], which will be presented at the Seoul meeting. Community is invited to participate to this final round of consultation before the finalization of the report for Board action. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091118/196c883c/attachment.html From sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr Thu Nov 19 14:28:49 2009 From: sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bachollet?=) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:28:49 +0100 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Deadline for Public Consultation on Board Review WG Report approaching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000301ca6924$a2d074f0$e8715ed0$@bachollet@isoc.fr> Dear working group members ? Sorry for the delay to elaborate the following comments on Board Review WG to become an At-Large / ALAC comments. Please find attached a first draft. Or go to: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?the_future_structure_and_gover nance_of_icann I concentrate the comments on what I thought were the main questions. If you thing the comments by At-Large / ALAC must be given to other part of the document fill free to make a proposal. Can you send to this list your feedback ASAP? I remind you that we need to be ready for the 22nd of November (yes I now it is short ?ounce again sorry for that). Thanks for your help. S?bastien Bachollet Pr?sident d'honneur - Isoc France sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr De : ICANN At-Large Staff [mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org] Envoy? : mercredi 18 novembre 2009 17:42 ? : Adam Peake; S?bastien Bachollet Cc : icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org; alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org Objet : Deadline for Public Consultation on Board Review WG Report approaching Dear Chairs of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Governance of ICANN, We would like to inform you that the deadline for the public consultation on the Board Review ? Draft Final Working Group Report is this coming Sunday, 22 November 2009. You can find detailed information on this consultation under: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 The full At-Large Policy Advice Schedule is available under: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/policycalendar Explanation/Background: ICANN appointed the Boston Consulting Group/Colin Carter & Associates to perform the external review of its Board of Directors; their review report < http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-02nov08-en.htm#reports> was presented during a public workshop at the ICANN meeting in Cairo and a public comment period followed. The Board review WG, considering the Independent Reviewer's final report, Board input, and comments from stakeholders and the public, issued an Interim Report for consultation with the Community < http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/board/board-review-interim-report-20feb09-en .pdf> , which was presented at the ICANN meeting in Mexico City. During the following public comment period further inputs were received from interested parties. A second interim report < http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/board/board-review-second-interim-report-05j un09-en.pdf> was then issued and presented at the ICANN meeting in Sydney. Comments received during its presentation and during the following public comments phase helped the Board review WG to conclude its analysis of the few issues that were still outstanding; the WG releases now its draft final report < http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/board/board-review-wg-draft-final-report-19s ep09-en.pdf> [PDF, 132K], which will be presented at the Seoul meeting. Community is invited to participate to this final round of consultation before the finalization of the report for Board action. -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091119/b102500f/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: AL_ALAC_1109_Board_RWG_sbt_V00.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 42255 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091119/b102500f/AL_ALAC_1109_Board_RWG_sbt_V00.docx From staff at atlarge.icann.org Fri Nov 20 18:16:59 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (At-Large Staff) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:59 +0000 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] DOODLE for Working Group Teleconference Week 48 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear All, Sebastien Bachollet asked us to organize a teleconference for the members of the working groups on the Future Structure of ICANN and Transparency and Accountability in the coming week. The goal of the meeting will be to discuss the a possible At-Large response to two currently public consultations: * Board Review WG Report ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009) * NomCom Review ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009) Please find attached a Doodle poll to try and find a suitable time. http://www.doodle.com/74tswucuhi2bxcxm Time-zone active This Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 24 November at 1200 UTC ? the date and time will be confirmed thereafter. Sebastien recently sent out a Draft Statement on the Board Review WG Report. A wiki version of the document can be found under: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review _wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en Please read the document in advance of the teleconference and add add your comments directly to the wiki page. There is currently no Draft Statement on the NomCom Review consultation. Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091120/02ae94aa/attachment.html From staff at atlarge.icann.org Wed Nov 25 11:08:54 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (ICANN At-Large Staff) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:08:54 -0800 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Dear All, Your are invited to participate in a discussion of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Accountability and Transparency of ICANN on the At-Large input for the Public Consultations on the Board and the NomCom Reviews. Day: Friday, 27 November Time: 1400 to 1500 UTC (find your local time under: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=27&year=2009&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) Participation instructions: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/teleconference-participation-en Background Material: * Board Review Statement drafted by Sebastien Bachollet: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review_wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en * NomCom Review Statement drafted by Wendy Seltzer for NARALO: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?naralo_statement_on_the_nomcom_review * Announcement Public Consultation on the Board Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 * Announcment Public Consultation on the NomCom Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org On 20/11/2009 19:16, "ICANN At-Large Staff" wrote: Dear All, Sebastien Bachollet asked us to organize a teleconference for the members of the working groups on the Future Structure of ICANN and Transparency and Accountability in the coming week. The goal of the meeting will be to discuss the a possible At-Large response to two currently public consultations: * Board Review WG Report ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009) * NomCom Review ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009) Please find attached a Doodle poll to try and find a suitable time. http://www.doodle.com/74tswucuhi2bxcxm Time-zone active This Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 24 November at 1200 UTC ? the date and time will be confirmed thereafter. Sebastien recently sent out a Draft Statement on the Board Review WG Report. A wiki version of the document can be found under: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review_wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en Please read the document in advance of the teleconference and add add your comments directly to the wiki page. There is currently no Draft Statement on the NomCom Review consultation. Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091125/fe002098/attachment.html From vanda at uol.com.br Wed Nov 25 19:06:58 2009 From: vanda at uol.com.br (Vanda UOL) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:06:58 -0200 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] [Trans-account-wg] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <011c01ca6e02$7b28ecb0$717ac610$@com.br> I will try to participate. I will be doing a speech in the morning about new TLD , this time to Gartner CIO meeting here. I don't know now if I will have any facility to call from the place of the meeting . having I will participate. Best Vanda Vanda Scartezini NEXTi_v1.jpg Alameda Santos 1470/1407 tel: + 55 11 3266.6253 mob:+ 55 11 8181.1464 From: trans-account-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:trans-account-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of ICANN At-Large Staff Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:09 AM To: icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org; trans-account-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Trans-account-wg] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC Dear All, Your are invited to participate in a discussion of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Accountability and Transparency of ICANN on the At-Large input for the Public Consultations on the Board and the NomCom Reviews. Day: Friday, 27 November Time: 1400 to 1500 UTC (find your local time under: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11 &day=27&year=2009&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) Participation instructions: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/teleconference-participation-en Background Material: * Board Review Statement drafted by Sebastien Bachollet: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review _wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en * NomCom Review Statement drafted by Wendy Seltzer for NARALO: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?naralo_statement_on_the_nomcom_revi ew * Announcement Public Consultation on the Board Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 * Announcment Public Consultation on the NomCom Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org On 20/11/2009 19:16, "ICANN At-Large Staff" wrote: Dear All, Sebastien Bachollet asked us to organize a teleconference for the members of the working groups on the Future Structure of ICANN and Transparency and Accountability in the coming week. The goal of the meeting will be to discuss the a possible At-Large response to two currently public consultations: * Board Review WG Report ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009) * NomCom Review ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009) Please find attached a Doodle poll to try and find a suitable time. http://www.doodle.com/74tswucuhi2bxcxm Time-zone active This Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 24 November at 1200 UTC - the date and time will be confirmed thereafter. Sebastien recently sent out a Draft Statement on the Board Review WG Report. A wiki version of the document can be found under: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review _wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en Please read the document in advance of the teleconference and add add your comments directly to the wiki page. There is currently no Draft Statement on the NomCom Review consultation. Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091125/389d986b/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 1570 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091125/389d986b/attachment.jpe From vanda at uol.com.br Thu Nov 26 13:01:04 2009 From: vanda at uol.com.br (Vanda UOL) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 11:01:04 -0200 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <02a401ca6e98$89d73ff0$9d85bfd0$@com.br> I will attend , have been part of the group. best cid:image002.jpg at 01C93E96.B7BF8BD0 Vanda Scartezini Polo Consultores Associados Alameda Santos 1470 #1407 Tel - +55.11.3266.6253 Mob- +55.11.8181.1464 vanda at uol.com.br From: icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of ICANN At-Large Staff Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 9:09 AM To: icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org; trans-account-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff; alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [Icann-future-wg] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC Dear All, Your are invited to participate in a discussion of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Accountability and Transparency of ICANN on the At-Large input for the Public Consultations on the Board and the NomCom Reviews. Day: Friday, 27 November Time: 1400 to 1500 UTC (find your local time under: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11 &day=27&year=2009&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) Participation instructions: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/teleconference-participation-en Background Material: * Board Review Statement drafted by Sebastien Bachollet: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review _wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en * NomCom Review Statement drafted by Wendy Seltzer for NARALO: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?naralo_statement_on_the_nomcom_revi ew * Announcement Public Consultation on the Board Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 * Announcment Public Consultation on the NomCom Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org On 20/11/2009 19:16, "ICANN At-Large Staff" wrote: Dear All, Sebastien Bachollet asked us to organize a teleconference for the members of the working groups on the Future Structure of ICANN and Transparency and Accountability in the coming week. The goal of the meeting will be to discuss the a possible At-Large response to two currently public consultations: * Board Review WG Report ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009) * NomCom Review ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009) Please find attached a Doodle poll to try and find a suitable time. http://www.doodle.com/74tswucuhi2bxcxm Time-zone active This Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 24 November at 1200 UTC - the date and time will be confirmed thereafter. Sebastien recently sent out a Draft Statement on the Board Review WG Report. A wiki version of the document can be found under: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review _wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en Please read the document in advance of the teleconference and add add your comments directly to the wiki page. There is currently no Draft Statement on the NomCom Review consultation. Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/06e16732/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 1592 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/06e16732/attachment.jpe From mailer at doodle.com Thu Nov 26 13:16:42 2009 From: mailer at doodle.com (Doodle (on behalf of Nick Ashton-Hart)) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:16:42 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Doodle: At-Large Director Selection Process Message-ID: <63455558.16814.1259241402981.JavaMail.doodle@db2> Nick Ashton-Hart invites you to participate in Doodle poll "At-Large Director Selection Process". Follow this link to participate in it: http://www.doodle.com/iiwdpvdhdiady3wdrszrq24p/private Please note that this is a personal link that cannot be shared with other poll participants. Dear All, The At-Large Advisory Committee (?ALAC?) would like to get additional At-Large community feedback on the current thinking which various RALOs have come up with on the process to appoint a voting ICANN Board Director in order to submit a process to the Structural Improvements Committee of the Board within the next several weeks. You may find the current information and thinking on the process at: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?at_large_director_appointment_process. We have created a Doodle page for you to indicate the preferred time and date you would like. If you need to participate in a language other than english, please put the language you need next to your name. This Doodle poll closes Monday, 30 November at 23:00 UTC. Get Premium Doodle: more features, no ads http://doodle.com/r/enPremiumDoodle From mailer at doodle.com Thu Nov 26 14:25:51 2009 From: mailer at doodle.com (Doodle (on behalf of Nick Ashton-Hart)) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:25:51 +0100 (CET) Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Doodle update: At-Large Director Selection Process Message-ID: <857002242.25865.1259245551553.JavaMail.doodle@db2> Nick Ashton-Hart has edited Doodle poll "At-Large Director Selection Process", in which you have already participated, and you may want to edit your entry or update your calendar. Follow this link to open the poll: http://www.doodle.com/iiwdpvdhdiady3wdrszrq24p/private Please note that this is a personal link that cannot be shared with other poll participants. From staff at atlarge.icann.org Thu Nov 26 14:31:28 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (At-Large Staff) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:31:28 +0100 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] At-Large Director Selection Process - REVISED Message-ID: <4B0E9140.5080204@atlarge.icann.org> Dear All: Our apologies, in setting up the previous poll we (Nick :)) inadvertently chose an option that limited participation to only a handful of people. Please use the following link instead. The previous poll has been deleted. http://www.doodle.com/4iprcbvzss4gqg9t -- Regards, *ICANN At-Large Staff* Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/aa875922/attachment.html From alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca Thu Nov 26 15:04:49 2009 From: alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca (Alan Greenberg) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:04:49 -0500 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] At-Large Director Selection Process - REVISED In-Reply-To: <4B0E9140.5080204@atlarge.icann.org> References: <4B0E9140.5080204@atlarge.icann.org> Message-ID: <20091126150457.YUCN29284.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip4.srvr.bell.ca> Can you please specify what the duration of the meeting will be. Alan At 26/11/2009 09:31 AM, At-Large Staff wrote: >Dear All: > >Our apologies, in setting up the previous poll we (Nick :)) >inadvertently chose an option that limited participation to only a >handful of people. > >Please use the following link instead. The previous poll has been deleted. > >http://www.doodle.com/4iprcbvzss4gqg9t >-- > >Regards, > > > >ICANN At-Large Staff > >Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White > >staff at atlarge.icann.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/c29608ac/attachment.html From staff at atlarge.icann.org Thu Nov 26 15:17:29 2009 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (At-Large Staff) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:17:29 +0100 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] At-Large Director Selection Process - REVISED In-Reply-To: <20091126150457.YUCN29284.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip4.srvr.bell.ca> References: <4B0E9140.5080204@atlarge.icann.org> <20091126150457.YUCN29284.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@toip4.srvr.bell.ca> Message-ID: <4B0E9C09.2060603@atlarge.icann.org> Our understanding is that it is expected to be 60 - 90 minutes. Alan Greenberg wrote: > Can you please specify what the duration of the meeting will be. Alan > > At 26/11/2009 09:31 AM, At-Large Staff wrote: >> Dear All: >> >> Our apologies, in setting up the previous poll we (Nick :)) >> inadvertently chose an option that limited participation to only a >> handful of people. >> >> Please use the following link instead. The previous poll has been >> deleted. >> >> http://www.doodle.com/4iprcbvzss4gqg9t >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> *ICANN At-Large Staff >> * >> Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella >> Gruber-White >> >> staff at atlarge.icann.org >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > ICANN-Future-WG mailing list > ICANN-Future-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-future-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org > -- Regards, *ICANN At-Large Staff* Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White staff at atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/46478fe6/attachment.html From nick.ashton-hart at icann.org Fri Nov 27 14:10:47 2009 From: nick.ashton-hart at icann.org (Nick Ashton-Hart) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:10:47 +0100 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] URL for agenda page for today's meeting Message-ID: <4B0FDDE7.5070307@icann.org> For those who cannot find the link to the page, you can find it at https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?27_november_2009 -- -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart Director for At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Tel: +33 (450) 42 81 83 USA Tel: +1 (310) 301-8637 Fax: : +41 (22) 594-85-44 Mobile: (Switzerland): +41 79 595 5468 email: nick.ashton-hart at icann.org Win IM: ashtonhart at hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart at mac.com / Skype: nashtonhart Online Bio: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart From ajp at glocom.ac.jp Fri Nov 27 16:37:41 2009 From: ajp at glocom.ac.jp (Adam Peake) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:37:41 +0900 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] call -- sorry In-Reply-To: <4B0FDDE7.5070307@icann.org> References: <4B0FDDE7.5070307@icann.org> Message-ID: Apologies for just dropping off the call. I hadn't been watching the clock and came close to missing my last train. Adam From ajp at glocom.ac.jp Sat Nov 28 15:04:38 2009 From: ajp at glocom.ac.jp (Adam Peake) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:04:38 +0900 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] call -- sorry In-Reply-To: References: <4B0FDDE7.5070307@icann.org> Message-ID: Sebastien, all, as promised, some comments on the ALAC statement on the board review. Please note recommendation 5, do you agree with me, 4 years is a bad idea? Sebastien, about recommendation 1 and your comments. I hope Alan, Carlton and others can help with redrafting. But three comments: 1. ALAC agrees with the WG overall conclusion that on balance no change in the current liaison arrangement needs to be made. But disagrees with the WG when it suggests an At Large voting director should replace the ALAC liaison. ALAC recommends that when the At Large voting director is selected and seated, the ALAC liaison position to the board continues at least until such time as a second voting Director in put in place (as recommended during the ALAC review.) The roles of the liaison and voting director are different, it is important that the ALAC as an advisory committee is able to present opinions on policy to the board that reflect the bottom-up RALO process. The person selected by the At Large end users as a voting director will serve the interests of the corporation and not act as a representative of the constituency that selected them. The board will loose an important input on ICANN policy if the liaison is removed. 2. The ALAC is currently working on a selection process for the voting director. 3. The ALAC believes it is very importance that ICANN seeks to achieve gender balance membership of the board and in all decision-making bodies. The working group's final report should make a recommendation to this effect. Other recommendations. Recommendation 2. ALAC agrees with the WG comment. However, we are concerned that the WG is suggesting the board take on more work and this is not consistent with what we believe should be the overall intent of the review to reduce Director's workload and time spent on ICANN matters. Whatever changes are made, we insist that the board continue to operate in the most transparent and open manner possible. Particularly we recommend that all staff inputs to the board --policy briefing documents, note for board meetings, etc-- be made publicly available. Recommendation 3. Agree with the WG, no further comment. Recommendation 4. Note that the ALAC broadly agrees with the WG's comments and then go to Sebastien's comment. About the draft response to 4.g, I think remove the word "dinner", just meet with. About 4.c, (I think Sebastien's note calls it 4.d) 4.c, The ALAC wishes to note the importance of the NomCom as an independent committee and that it must remain so. We would like the WG to be more direct in rejecting the proposal in 4.c. ALAC believes that it is important for the NomCom to meet with all the bodies it selects people for, and also with other ALAC committees and constituencies. This is to ensure the NomCom is fully informed of the ICANN community's opinions and needs regarding the NomCom's work, and that the community is encouraged to support the NomCom in identifying likely candidates. Recommendation 5. ALAC disagrees with the WG regarding extending the term of board members to 4 years. We have seen no evidence that a longer term is required, board members have been able to get up to speed and contribute fully within their first year of service. A longer term may cause problems with board members who are not performing to the fullest of their abilities, but do not meet the threshold for removal. A longer term may make it more difficult to recruit candidates to what is known to be a very demanding and time consuming position. ALAC is pleased to note that the WG refers to "At Large appointees", plural, to the board. Please see our comments about retaining the liaison, above. [**THIS might be a bit flippant, Adam**] Regarding removal and replacement of Directors, ALAC notes that other bodies that the NomCom selects people for have already put in place processes for removal, under certain circumstances, of NomCom appointees in their own bylaws and procedures. We suggest that these processes should be consistent across all the bodies the NomCom selects for and the General Counsel should include this task in his work recommended by the WG. Once disbanded, the NomCom has no institutional memory and only retains information about candidates for one year. As such the NomCom may not be in a position to help with a replacement process for any vacancy occurring after a person's first year of service. The board, in consultation with the ICANN community may be the only body able to select a replacement (note, the Board's selection of GNSO Council member for the Non-commercial Stakeholders Group.) ALAC broadly supports providing compensation for board members and for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in their work for ICANN. The General Counsel's study on compensation should include an examination of possible methods (for example, from an annual fee to a series of seating allowances that might better reflect the work done by individual members, etc) and the appropriate level of compensation, taking into compensation made to corporate and non-profit boards, national and international organizations around the world. Recommendation 6. The ALAC has begun a process of creating performance indicators for ALAC members. We agree with the WG's comments. Recommendation 7. ALAC supports the WG's comments, with some observations. Regarding comments on 7.a, whatever changes are implemented, the full transparency, openness and accountability of the board must be ensured. 7.b, we agree to the importance of the strategic and operational planning processes, however we believe the board should focus on the goals of these processes, it should lead them and make sure they are successfully met. We are concerned that any goals independent of the strategic and operational planning processes might be a distraction and detract from their successful implementation. Regarding 7.c, it would be helpful to accurately understand how much time board members spend on ICANN matters. Many estimates have been made, and accurate knowledge would help matters ranging from recruitment to compensation. Such data may also identify areas that can be improved. Recommendation 8. ALAC agrees with the WG's comments. Thank you, etc... From ajp at glocom.ac.jp Sun Nov 29 11:36:07 2009 From: ajp at glocom.ac.jp (Adam Peake) Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:36:07 +0900 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] NomCom, new draft Message-ID: Please see attached. Made some changes to the NA RALO statement. Comments? Particularly, is the part on removal/replacement consistent with earlier ALAC statements? Thanks, Adam -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Statement-NomCom-WG.docx Type: application/octet-stream Size: 119484 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091129/a9132425/Statement-NomCom-WG.docx From yaovito at yahoo.fr Thu Nov 26 07:45:44 2009 From: yaovito at yahoo.fr (Yaovi Atohoun) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:45:44 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [Icann-future-wg] Re : [ALAC-Announce] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <836587.44016.qm@web23101.mail.ird.yahoo.com> I will participate. Yaovi Atohoun --- En date de?: Mer 25.11.09, ICANN At-Large Staff a ?crit?: De: ICANN At-Large Staff Objet: [ALAC-Announce] INVITATION: Working Group Teleconference 27 November 2009 1400 UTC ?: "icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org" , "trans-account-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org" Cc: "ICANN At-Large Staff" , "alac-announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org" Date: Mercredi 25 Novembre 2009, 12h08 Dear All, Your are invited to participate in a discussion of the Working Group on the Future Structure and Accountability and Transparency of ICANN on the At-Large input for the Public Consultations on the Board and the NomCom Reviews. Day: Friday, 27 November Time:? 1400 to 1500 UTC (find your local time under: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=27&year=2009&hour=14&min=0&sec=0&p1=0) Participation instructions: http://www.atlarge.icann.org/teleconference-participation-en Background Material: *???Board Review Statement drafted by Sebastien Bachollet: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review_wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en *???NomCom Review Statement drafted by Wendy Seltzer for NARALO: https://st.icann.org/alac-docs/index.cgi?naralo_statement_on_the_nomcom_review *???Announcement Public Consultation on the Board Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009 *???Announcment Public Consultation on the NomCom Review: http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009 -- Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org On 20/11/2009 19:16, "ICANN At-Large Staff" wrote: Dear All, Sebastien Bachollet asked us to organize a teleconference for the members of the working groups on the Future Structure of ICANN and Transparency and Accountability in the coming week. The goal of the meeting will be to discuss the a possible At-Large response to two currently public consultations: *???Board Review WG Report ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#board-review-2009) *???NomCom Review ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#nomcom-review-2009) Please find attached a Doodle poll to try and find a suitable time. http://www.doodle.com/74tswucuhi2bxcxm Time-zone active This Doodle poll will close on Tuesday 24 November at 1200 UTC ? the date and time will be confirmed thereafter. Sebastien recently sent out a Draft Statement on the Board Review WG Report. A wiki version of the document can be found under: https://st.icann.org/working-groups/index.cgi?alac_statement_on_board_review_wg_report_al_alac_st_1109_1_en Please read the document in advance of the teleconference and add add your comments directly to the wiki page. There is currently no Draft Statement on the NomCom Review consultation. Thank you Regards, Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White ICANN At-Large Staff email: staff at atlarge.icann.org _______________________________________________ ALAC-Announce mailing list ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce_atlarge-lists.icann.org At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091126/0fab89f1/attachment.html From sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr Mon Nov 30 15:24:24 2009 From: sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr (=?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Bachollet?=) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:24:24 +0100 Subject: [Icann-future-wg] At-Large/ALAC comments on Draft Final Report of the ICANN Board Review Working Group In-Reply-To: References: <4B0FDDE7.5070307@icann.org> Message-ID: <015701ca71d1$34b34d70$9e19e850$@bachollet@isoc.fr> All, Thanks Adam for your input. I try to build a new version taking into account your propositions. Please find it hare and attached. Your comments are welcome. Introduction The ICANN Board Review Working Group issue a Draft Final Report on the 19th of September 2009 open for comments. http://www.icann.org/en/reviews/board/board-review-wg-draft-final-report-19s ep09-en.pdf The following document select the main issues At-Large/ALAC is willing to address, propose comments and opinions to be raise as an Advisor body to the board concerning the Board review and linked maters. They will be also provided to http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/public-comment-200911.html#board-revi ew-2009 At-Large / ALAC welcomes the opportunity to comment upon the draft final report of the ICANN Board Review Working Group. Our comments have been divided following the recommendations of the draft final report. At-Large / ALAC want to express a broad support of the WG recommendations contain in the Draft Final Report. Recommendation #1: Reduce the size of the board The At-Large / ALAC fully support ?the specific nature and unique governance model of ICANN?. A large representativeness of the board is very important. The role of the NomCom to provide balance and diversity is essential because in the other bodies selecting board members there is no possibilities to have any balance. For example GNSO with the 2 board directors who will come from each house or At-Large / ALAC with just one board member, are not able even to have any balance. CcNSO council and ALAC are good examples for real geographic balance but there still a lot to do for other type of balance even with the help of the NomCom. At-Large / ALAC think that right now 2 seats elected by At-Large / ALAC will allow some balance possibilities and to be more confidante that the voice of the End-Users will participate better to the Board of ICANN work. At-Large / ALAC agree with the WG overall conclusion that on balance no change in the current liaison arrangement needs to be made. But disagrees with the WG when it suggests an At Large voting director should replace the ALAC liaison. ALAC recommends that when the At Large voting director is selected and seated, the ALAC liaison position to the board continues at least until such time as a second voting Director in put in place (as recommended during the ALAC review) The roles of the liaison and voting director are different, it is important that the ALAC as an advisory committee is able to present opinions on policy to the board that reflect the bottom-up End users/ALS/RALO process. The person selected by the At Large end users as a voting director will serve the interests of the corporation and not act as a representative of the constituency that selected them. The board will loose an important input on ICANN policy if the liaison is removed at this time. At-Large / ALAC is currently working on a selection/election process for the voting director. Recommendation #2: Move to fewer but longer board meetings At-Large / ALAC agrees with the WG comment. However, we are concerned that the WG is suggesting the board take on more work and this is not consistent with what we believe should be the overall intent of the review to reduce Director's workload and time spent on ICANN matters. Whatever changes are made, we insist that the board continue to operate in the most transparent and open manner possible. Particularly we recommend that all staff inputs to the board --policy briefing documents, note for board meetings, etc-- be made publicly available. Recommendation #3: Consolidate the board committees At-Large / ALAC agrees with the WG, no further comment. Recommendation #4: Broaden the skills of the board At-Large / ALAC broadly agrees with the WG's comments. However At-Large / ALAC request that the community to work on giving weight (or a ranking) to the following items to allow a better mix within the Board (and the other bodies) of ICANN: ? skill, ? experience, ? independence, ? geographic, ? cultural, ? stakeholder diversity, ? gender, ? language, ? ability, ? competency To start the debate At-Large / ALAC believes it is very importance that ICANN seeks to achieve gender balance membership of the board and in all decision-making bodies. The working group's final report should make a recommendation to this effect. At-Large / ALAC wishes to note the importance of the NomCom as an independent committee and that it must remain so. We would like the WG to be more direct in rejecting the proposal in 4.c. At-Large / ALAC believes that it is important for the NomCom to meet with all the bodies it selects people for, and also with other ICANN committees and constituencies. This is to ensure the NomCom is fully informed of the ICANN community's opinions and needs regarding the NomCom's work, and that the community is encouraged to support the NomCom in identifying likely candidates. Regarding recommendation 4(d) At-Large / ALAC is already giving inputs to the NomCom by informal exchanges between the two Chairs. We would like to amend the recommendation 4(g) by (g) Occasionally invite prominent company [and not-for-profit organizations] directors to meet the board [over dinner] to talk about 'the role of the director'. Recommendation #5: Make board membership more sustainable At-Large / ALAC disagrees with the WG regarding extending the term of board members to 4 years. We have seen no evidence that a longer term is required, board members have been able to get up to speed and contribute fully within their first year of service. A longer term may cause problems with board members who are not performing to the fullest of their abilities, but do not meet the threshold for removal. A longer term may make it more difficult to recruit candidates to what is known to be a very demanding and time consuming position. Regarding removal and replacement of Directors, At-Large / ALAC notes that other bodies that the NomCom selects people for have already put in place processes for removal, under certain circumstances, of NomCom appointees in their own bylaws and procedures. We suggest that these processes should be consistent across all the bodies the NomCom selects for and the General Counsel should include this task in his work recommended by the WG. Once disbanded, the NomCom has no institutional memory and only retains information about candidates for one year. As such the NomCom may not be in a position to help with a replacement process for any vacancy occurring after a person's first year of service. The board, in consultation with the ICANN community may be the only body able to select a replacement (note, the Board's selection of GNSO Council member for the Non-commercial Stakeholders Group.) At-Large / ALAC broadly supports providing compensation for board members and for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in their work for ICANN. The General Counsel's study on compensation should include an examination of possible methods (for example, from an annual fee to a series of seating allowances that might better reflect the work done by individual members, etc) and the appropriate level of compensation, taking into consideration compensation made to corporate and non-profit boards, national and international organizations around the world. Recommendation #6: Build 'high performance' culture at the board level At-Large / ALAC has begun a process of creating performance indicators for ALAC members. We agree with the WG's comments. Recommendation #7: Strengthen the 'strategic' focus of the board At-Large / ALAC supports the WG's comments, with some observations. Regarding comments on 7.a, whatever changes are implemented, the full transparency, openness and accountability of the board must be ensured. 7.b, we agree to the importance of the strategic and operational planning processes, however we believe the board should focus on the goals of these processes, it should lead them and make sure they are successfully met. We are concerned that any goals independent of the strategic and operational planning processes might be a distraction and detract from their successful implementation. Regarding 7.c, it would be helpful to accurately understand how much time board members spend on ICANN matters. Many estimates have been made, and accurate knowledge would help matters ranging from recruitment to compensation. Such data may also identify areas that can be improved. Recommendation #8: Clarify the board?s accountabilities. Initiate a program of discussions that explore the following propositions At-Large / ALAC agrees with the WG's comments. S?bastien Bachollet Pr?sident d'honneur - Isoc France sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr www.egeni.org www.isoc.fr ? > -----Message d'origine----- > De?: icann-future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:icann- > future-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Adam Peake > Envoy??: samedi 28 novembre 2009 16:05 > ??: icann-future-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org > Objet?: Re: [Icann-future-wg] call -- sorry > > Sebastien, all, as promised, some comments on the ALAC statement on > the board review. Please note recommendation 5, do you agree with > me, 4 years is a bad idea? > > Sebastien, about recommendation 1 and your comments. I hope Alan, > Carlton and others can help with redrafting. But three comments: > > 1. ALAC agrees with the WG overall conclusion that on balance no > change in the current liaison arrangement needs to be made. But > disagrees with the WG when it suggests an At Large voting director > should replace the ALAC liaison. ALAC recommends that when the At > Large voting director is selected and seated, the ALAC liaison > position to the board continues at least until such time as a second > voting Director in put in place (as recommended during the ALAC > review.) The roles of the liaison and voting director are different, > it is important that the ALAC as an advisory committee is able to > present opinions on policy to the board that reflect the bottom-up > RALO process. The person selected by the At Large end users as a > voting director will serve the interests of the corporation and not > act as a representative of the constituency that selected them. The > board will loose an important input on ICANN policy if the liaison is > removed. > > 2. The ALAC is currently working on a selection process for the > voting director. > > 3. The ALAC believes it is very importance that ICANN seeks to > achieve gender balance membership of the board and in all > decision-making bodies. The working group's final report should make > a recommendation to this effect. > > Other recommendations. > > Recommendation 2. ALAC agrees with the WG comment. However, we are > concerned that the WG is suggesting the board take on more work and > this is not consistent with what we believe should be the overall > intent of the review to reduce Director's workload and time spent on > ICANN matters. Whatever changes are made, we insist that the board > continue to operate in the most transparent and open manner possible. > Particularly we recommend that all staff inputs to the board --policy > briefing documents, note for board meetings, etc-- be made publicly > available. > > Recommendation 3. Agree with the WG, no further comment. > > Recommendation 4. Note that the ALAC broadly agrees with the WG's > comments and then go to Sebastien's comment. About the draft > response to 4.g, I think remove the word "dinner", just meet with. > About 4.c, (I think Sebastien's note calls it 4.d) 4.c, The ALAC > wishes to note the importance of the NomCom as an independent > committee and that it must remain so. We would like the WG to be > more direct in rejecting the proposal in 4.c. ALAC believes that it > is important for the NomCom to meet with all the bodies it selects > people for, and also with other ALAC committees and constituencies. > This is to ensure the NomCom is fully informed of the ICANN > community's opinions and needs regarding the NomCom's work, and that > the community is encouraged to support the NomCom in identifying > likely candidates. > > Recommendation 5. > > ALAC disagrees with the WG regarding extending the term of board > members to 4 years. We have seen no evidence that a longer term is > required, board members have been able to get up to speed and > contribute fully within their first year of service. A longer term > may cause problems with board members who are not performing to the > fullest of their abilities, but do not meet the threshold for > removal. A longer term may make it more difficult to recruit > candidates to what is known to be a very demanding and time consuming > position. > > ALAC is pleased to note that the WG refers to "At Large appointees", > plural, to the board. Please see our comments about retaining the > liaison, above. [**THIS might be a bit flippant, Adam**] > > Regarding removal and replacement of Directors, ALAC notes that other > bodies that the NomCom selects people for have already put in place > processes for removal, under certain circumstances, of NomCom > appointees in their own bylaws and procedures. We suggest that these > processes should be consistent across all the bodies the NomCom > selects for and the General Counsel should include this task in his > work recommended by the WG. > > Once disbanded, the NomCom has no institutional memory and only > retains information about candidates for one year. As such the NomCom > may not be in a position to help with a replacement process for any > vacancy occurring after a person's first year of service. The board, > in consultation with the ICANN community may be the only body able to > select a replacement (note, the Board's selection of GNSO Council > member for the Non-commercial Stakeholders Group.) > > ALAC broadly supports providing compensation for board members and > for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in their work for ICANN. > The General Counsel's study on compensation should include an > examination of possible methods (for example, from an annual fee to a > series of seating allowances that might better reflect the work done > by individual members, etc) and the appropriate level of > compensation, taking into compensation made to corporate and > non-profit boards, national and international organizations around > the world. > > Recommendation 6. > > The ALAC has begun a process of creating performance indicators for > ALAC members. We agree with the WG's comments. > > > Recommendation 7. > > ALAC supports the WG's comments, with some observations. Regarding > comments on 7.a, whatever changes are implemented, the full > transparency, openness and accountability of the board must be > ensured. 7.b, we agree to the importance of the strategic and > operational planning processes, however we believe the board should > focus on the goals of these processes, it should lead them and make > sure they are successfully met. We are concerned that any goals > independent of the strategic and operational planning processes might > be a distraction and detract from their successful implementation. > Regarding 7.c, it would be helpful to accurately understand how much > time board members spend on ICANN matters. Many estimates have been > made, and accurate knowledge would help matters ranging from > recruitment to compensation. Such data may also identify areas that > can be improved. > > Recommendation 8. > > ALAC agrees with the WG's comments. > > Thank you, etc... > > _______________________________________________ > ICANN-Future-WG mailing list > ICANN-Future-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org > http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/icann-future- > wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: AL_ALAC_1109_Board_RWG_V2.docx Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Size: 37608 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/icann-future-wg/attachments/20091130/6973c342/AL_ALAC_1109_Board_RWG_V2.docx