[Internal-cg] Mailing list behaviour

[Paul Wilson]

good points.  agreed.

________________________________________________________________________
Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC                      <dg at apnic.net>
http://www.apnic.net                                     +61 7 3858 3100

See you at APNIC 38!                      http://conference.apnic.net/38





On 2 Aug 2014, at 3:30 pm, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> All,
> 
> Although we are an open process, I would like to discourage cc:ing *this* list on other mailing lists, for example the ones where communities do discuss their respective proposals that ultimately might end up on our table. Those proposals should later be submitted to us via some contact mechanism that is to be defined. This so that we can clearly know and understand what feedback we really have got, that can be included in the various summaries we create, and conclusions we draw from the coordination.
> 
> Yes, people will, and have, cc:ed this list. In one case the posting was rejected but forwarded to this list. I think that is wrong, and that we when we remember should remove this list when we respond to threads where this list has been added.
> 
> I want to use this list for our internal discussions and processes.
> 
> Am I completely off?
> 
>   Patrik
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg