[Internal-cg] Charter commenting

[Alissa Cooper]

Not too many people have commented on this, but all the comments are in a
similar direction, so I’m going to go ahead and ask the ICANN folks to
setup a forum and get a page ready that has all the relevant details,
including a notice along the lines that Daniel proposes below about our
much preferred communication mechanism being via the relevant communities
and ICG participants. I’d like to also list an email address contact for
the secretariat on the forum landing page, so that if people don’t know
how to find a particular community or ICG participant, the secretariat can
help point those people in the right direction or ask us for such
direction.

Let’s give a 10-day comment period once the page and forum get setup —
compromise between 7 and 14. :) Plus if we do that we should have a decent
chance of having some synthesis of the charter comments ready in time for
our to-be-scheduled teleconference in late August.

Comments welcome on this plan, of course.
Alissa

On 8/4/14, 8:30 AM, "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
>I agree that we should set up a mechanism for comments from the
>general public with the following properties:
>
>It clearly, bluntly, repeatedly and unavoidably states that the
>preferred method for participation is via the relevant communities.
>  Maybe we should have a check box where people have to acknowledge
>that they understand this before they can post a comment. ;-)
>
>All comments should be stored in a public archive for all to see,
>including for us. Comments in this archive should be kept available
>for all to see for at least 5 years after they are made.
>
>Discussion should be strongly discouraged in this mechanism. There are
>other places for that already; the most appropriate are the relevant
>communities.
>
>We can then see all these comments and take them into account as
>appropriate.
>
>
>- ----
>
>
>Comments for the charter should be treated as just a special case of
>the above.  14 calendar days is about the right time for this as this
>is about the time we would need to get substantive comments from our
>communities and I do not see that final agreement on the charter will
>substantially delay our other current work.
>
>
>Daniel
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
>
>iQIVAwUBU9+nINDY5Emqa716AQLdBQ//SiFPTNCCn69DUAeN44Q0zrUdzwnw924H
>JIGV5mNTO2BaHrwdgdJOm1D7PZUIHkyOPZ56OorvXWyQDgZy0bM7jA/P0IuHAfXL
>CtSGI2+o5jqmN/er00JaS1M7XvjD+1ELC0OkG5zmUY8PD1W+yOGreJ0P2e6y/T7A
>9SQr1aaGCASlPrCRFTZ3yggSBzkIh1/atlcZk84tnYf04hnTmjuX3w8eJIt9kixp
>qzRZj8qOTyRW8fbQNYD9BeiMiqpcha4uaU27/gK0Xa91LtQoVGFY5sRceRcBHp4C
>XiqlH1QQa2vN2AXvQJ3uAVJep/CCUCBRl+i/rfAcjTA7TWegNL6PEidTbatJzGO4
>NC36/UDflT99KcGM7F8i/UBDcIiiv56vjbzRez7id7VRQMVxn58pLusKVDYHkkQc
>JDVgo3IB9HETfUqRr3gFQYA9Wx7gklF0ssbZuoz70534r2CQzEtqGOlqC/6OJzjx
>u4PsUhHPlnkzJk+P1k3o0eC6TqrRTzpGwblDiiq5/bGCDmNXBXZW9NXTWewwbB9q
>ZxuP6K0BNiM1pKLXkHlTw3IQNVtIFKodIjHnp/b0vcGtGYEz7gBu4lHhJHbzks9/
>SUNpeIRcPeVUD92+G75MDDNDlli/+sFu89pOrv0l8x6y0KOikILLpknlY9+BlHZC
>WmXf5z9aPHg=
>=1pee
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg