[Internal-cg] Charter commenting

[Alissa Cooper]

Ok, I made a couple of edits to the proposed landing page text to
accommodate suggestions received. I slightly softened the language around
community comments being our preferred mechanism and added a new final
paragraph to address Paul’s and Mohamed’s points. We can keep tweaking
this, but I’d like for ICANN to start getting it up on a web page in the
meantime. New text:

===

ICG Charter Open for Public Comments

On July 18, the IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG)
produced a draft charter <link> that defines its own tasks. The charter is
open for public comment until August XX, 2014 at 20:00 UTC. <bold>It is
the strong preference of the ICG that comments about the charter from the
public be submitted via existing IANA-related community processes, and not
through the link provided below.</bold> If you need assistance finding
those processes or contacting the appropriate ICG participant, please
contact <secretariat-email>. If you are not able to provide comments
through a relevant community or ICG participant, a mechanism for
submitting comments via an email alias is linked below.

Please be aware that the ICG views defining the broad outlines of its
charter as important, but it views finalizing the charter and moving on to
the real work of the transition planning to be of equal importance. As a
result not all comments submitted concerning the charter will necessarily
be incorporated.

Public comments are considered to be for the public record, and for the
information and consideration of all participants in this process, not
just for the ICG. Everyone is encouraged to review any public comments
that may be submitted via the process below.

Public comment submission process links:

Comment submission: <link>
List of comments submitted via this site: <link>
Charter: <link> 
Deadline: August XX, 2014 at 20:00 UTC


===

Alissa

On 8/5/14, 11:47 AM, "Paul Wilson" <pwilson at apnic.net> wrote:

>I agree with Daniel’s proposal here.
>
>Can we state that public comments are considered to be for the public
>record, and for the information and consideration of all participants in
>this process, not just for the ICG.  This is reasonable I think, along
>with the emphasis on contributions via the relevant communities.
>
>Paul.
>
>
>
>On 5 Aug 2014, at 1:30 am, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>
>wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I agree that we should set up a mechanism for comments from the
>> general public with the following properties:
>> 
>> It clearly, bluntly, repeatedly and unavoidably states that the
>> preferred method for participation is via the relevant communities.
>>  Maybe we should have a check box where people have to acknowledge
>> that they understand this before they can post a comment. ;-)
>> 
>> All comments should be stored in a public archive for all to see,
>> including for us. Comments in this archive should be kept available
>> for all to see for at least 5 years after they are made.
>> 
>> Discussion should be strongly discouraged in this mechanism. There are
>> other places for that already; the most appropriate are the relevant
>> communities.
>> 
>> We can then see all these comments and take them into account as
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> 
>> - ----
>> 
>> 
>> Comments for the charter should be treated as just a special case of
>> the above.  14 calendar days is about the right time for this as this
>> is about the time we would need to get substantive comments from our
>> communities and I do not see that final agreement on the charter will
>> substantially delay our other current work.
>> 
>> 
>> Daniel
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
>> 
>> iQIVAwUBU9+nINDY5Emqa716AQLdBQ//SiFPTNCCn69DUAeN44Q0zrUdzwnw924H
>> JIGV5mNTO2BaHrwdgdJOm1D7PZUIHkyOPZ56OorvXWyQDgZy0bM7jA/P0IuHAfXL
>> CtSGI2+o5jqmN/er00JaS1M7XvjD+1ELC0OkG5zmUY8PD1W+yOGreJ0P2e6y/T7A
>> 9SQr1aaGCASlPrCRFTZ3yggSBzkIh1/atlcZk84tnYf04hnTmjuX3w8eJIt9kixp
>> qzRZj8qOTyRW8fbQNYD9BeiMiqpcha4uaU27/gK0Xa91LtQoVGFY5sRceRcBHp4C
>> XiqlH1QQa2vN2AXvQJ3uAVJep/CCUCBRl+i/rfAcjTA7TWegNL6PEidTbatJzGO4
>> NC36/UDflT99KcGM7F8i/UBDcIiiv56vjbzRez7id7VRQMVxn58pLusKVDYHkkQc
>> JDVgo3IB9HETfUqRr3gFQYA9Wx7gklF0ssbZuoz70534r2CQzEtqGOlqC/6OJzjx
>> u4PsUhHPlnkzJk+P1k3o0eC6TqrRTzpGwblDiiq5/bGCDmNXBXZW9NXTWewwbB9q
>> ZxuP6K0BNiM1pKLXkHlTw3IQNVtIFKodIjHnp/b0vcGtGYEz7gBu4lHhJHbzks9/
>> SUNpeIRcPeVUD92+G75MDDNDlli/+sFu89pOrv0l8x6y0KOikILLpknlY9+BlHZC
>> WmXf5z9aPHg=
>> =1pee
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>_______________________________________________
>Internal-cg mailing list
>Internal-cg at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg