[Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
Joseph Alhadeff
joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Wed Aug 6 22:08:12 UTC 2014
Sure. I'm assuming the transition panel would be the most appropriate time and I am slotted to be on that panel as are a couple of other members I believe...
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in> wrote:
>
> Ok, it seems we have lots of support for doing a public session at ICANN
> 51. Alice has explained to me that session requests are due August 8 at
> 18:00 UTC. A session request consists of the following:
>
> * Session title;
> * Brief session overview (extensive session overview and agenda details
> can be provided closer to the date)
> * Number of attendees ( e.g. 150, 300, 500+)
> * Date, time and duration (From Alice: "based on our experience, I suggest
> holding the session on Wednesday as this timeframe will allow communities
> to hold discussions in their respective meetings prior to the session")
>
> Patrik, since people seemed to like your proposal, can I ask you to put
> together these details and get it back to the group and Alice before the
> deadline?
>
>
> Joe, can we give you an action item to start figuring out how/when a
> statement from the ICG might be read at the IGF and what it might contain?
>
> Thanks,
> Alissa
>
>> On 8/2/14, 10:27 AM, "Manal Ismail" <manal at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Alissa for the initiative and the suggestion ..
>> Yes for a public session at ICANN 51 .. and yes for 90 min. ..
>> Agree with Paul and others on maximizing the time for community
>> engagement,
>> Agree with Patrik's suggestion on how to manage the time of the session,
>> and
>> Agree with Joseph's suggestion regarding a "status update or brief
>> statement of position to be read at or distributed for the IANA
>> transition panel at IGF" ..
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> --Manal
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
>> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Lynn St.Amour
>> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 3:57 PM
>> To: WUKnoben
>> Cc: ICG
>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
>>
>> Agree and also think we need 90 mins. in total - 30 for pres. and 60 for
>> community engagement.
>>
>> Lynn
>>
>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:17 AM, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Patrik,
>>>
>>> as usual, you are far more structured in thinking ahead...
>>>
>>> I fully agree on how you see a public session, inparticular the
>>> exchange with the other "interested groups". So definitely I see here a
>>> need for 90 mins.
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Wolf-Ulrich
>>>
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Patrik Fältström
>>> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 7:34 AM
>>> To: Jari Arkko
>>> Cc: ICG
>>> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Public session at ICANN 51?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Internal-cg mailing list
>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
More information about the Internal-cg
mailing list