[Internal-cg] Chair structure.

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear All,
We should avoid "CLUB" arrangement.
there was no call  for  voluteers for Chair
There was real consensus in, its concept is understood by International
customary law , without being adjuctived like hard or soft or rough, in the
number of Vice chairs, Few peopèle supporting each other in a club concept
without listening to any other views
The process should examine the proposals from their merits and not from the
number of opponents and proponents .In other words, the issue should have
been treated qualitatively and not quantitatively ( no. of few old friends
,knowing each otherts from years, and not willing to listen or even examine
other proposal.
This is not a healthy and transparent process.
Best wishes to have a nice sunday for those still haing day time
Kavouss
There was no call


2014-08-10 20:45 GMT+02:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>:

> Dear ALL,
> In a transparent, inclussive and democratic process ,we need to to at
> leastconsider and take into account various views
> From the BEGINING, the process was self nomionation and accalamation by
> few Inside the current ICANN  colleagues.
> We should not only listen and talk to ourselves rather should listen and
> talk with others .
> I do not understand what was wrong in my last proposal " PACKAGE dEAL "
> We are criticising some people without any fair logic
> Tks on this nice sunday
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2014-08-10 20:26 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>:
>
> On 10.08.14 19:57 , James M. Bladel wrote:
>> > ICG Colleagues:
>> >
>> > Forgive me for being blunt, but why are we still discussing this?
>> >
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_law_of_triviality
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140810/4baab27d/attachment.html>