[Internal-cg] RFP subgroup

[joseph alhadeff]

Milton:

I still think we need to address the ability of stakeholders to directly 
comment to us in the development or on the unitary proposal. That is 
factual.

I'm also don't think that my language changes the charter as only 
operational communities submit proposals...

joe
On 8/26/2014 9:16 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> Joe
>
> I think this is too complicated and too big a deviation from our 
> earlier approach.
>
> I still think the solution to JJ's concerns is to be found in the 
> notion of the operational communities as convenors of proposal 
> development processes that must include other interested parties.
>
> I think all we need to do is alter the following sentence in the way I 
> suggest below:
>
> Original sentence:
>
> The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) seeks 
> /complete formal responses/ to this RFP from the "operational 
> communities" of IANA (i.e., those with direct operational or service 
> relationships with IANA, in connection with names, numbers, or 
> protocol parameters).
>
> Proposed modification:
>
> The IANA Stewardship Transition Coordination Group (ICG) requests 
> "operational communities" of IANA (i.e., those with direct operational 
> or service relationships with IANA, in connection with names, numbers, 
> or protocol parameters) to convene processes to develop /complete 
> formal responses/ to this RFP.
>
> This is a simpler change, does not alter the basic assumptions of our 
> charter, but also makes it clear that the operational communities are 
> responsible for convening processes that, according to other language 
> that is already in the RFP,
>
> Proposals are expected to enjoy a broad consensus of support from all 
> interested parties.  During the development of their proposals, the 
> operational communities are requested to consult and work with other 
> affected parties. Likewise, in order to help the ICG maintain its 
> light coordination role, all other affected parties are strongly 
> encouraged to participate in community processes.
>
> ...
>
> Communities are asked to adhere to open and inclusive processes in 
> developing their responses.... Etc.
>
> Milton L Mueller
>
> Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>
> http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
>
> *From:*internal-cg-bounces at icann.org 
> [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *joseph alhadeff
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:01 AM
> *To:* internal-cg at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP subgroup
>
> So here's a shot at compromise text...
>
> On 8/26/2014 8:43 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
>     I want to be on it.
>
>     Milton L Mueller
>
>     Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>
>     Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>
>     http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Internal-cg mailing list
>
>     Internal-cg at icann.org  <mailto:Internal-cg at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140826/6d1c3010/attachment.html>