[Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Fri Aug 29 16:47:22 UTC 2014


Dear Manal
,
I am not pointing toward any one who made the suggestion that the adjective
" Light " being added to the word or term " Coordination "
I am just saysing that ICG tasks . interalia, is to coordinate the
activities .
This does not any thing to do with TOP down or button up process .Just it
does not feet. It give the impression that the activities of ICCG on this
matter is a light activitiwes and not a complete and in-depth
Tks
Kavouss


2014-08-29 19:10 GMT+02:00 Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>:

> This was not the intention of course .. I have inserted this clause “in
> order to help ICG maintain its light coordination role” as I thought 2
> things would make it more convincing for non-operational parties to work
> through the operational communities processes:
>
> -          to make sure the ICG does not have a top-down decision-making
> authority, and
>
> -          to make sure their contributions are considered early within
> the process, and directly discussed with the relevant party
>
> Just thought to clarify, but I’m flexible should colleagues feel it does
> not serve the purpose of the first bullet ..
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> --Manal
>
>
>
> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh
> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 6:45 PM
> *To:* Milton L Mueller
>
> *Cc:* Coordination Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>
>
>
> Dear Milton,
>
> Thank you very much for your kind response .You are among the most
> knowledgeable and competent as far as I understand the exchange of message.
>
> Pls kindly note that the term LIGHT before coordination, weakenes our
> actions .It could be interpreted that the coordination actions that we
> undertake is not sufficiently serious as it is qualified by the adjective
> LIGHT.
>
>
>
> Would it cause any difficulty that we delete that and just refer to
> coordination without any qualification.
>
> Regards
>
> Kavouss
>
>
>
> 2014-08-29 15:54 GMT+02:00 Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>:
>
> My opinions regarding Kavouss’s proposed changes:
>
>
>
> Would prefer to keep “light” in there.
>
> OK to remove the word “only” from the paragraph on Comments
>
> OK to replace “direct” with “forward”
>
> OK to replace “encourages” with “urges”
>
>
>
> Milton L Mueller
>
> Laura J and L. Douglas Meredith Professor
>
> Syracuse University School of Information Studies
>
> http://faculty.ischool.syr.edu/mueller/
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Martin Boyle
> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2014 8:46 AM
> *To:* Kavouss Arasteh; Daniel Karrenberg
>
>
> *Cc:* Coordination Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>
>
>
> Thanks Alissa for your work on this.  I’m sure we could continue
> word-smithing this for a long time, and I’m happy to go.
>
>
>
> Kavouss’s comment on light:  I like the term as it reminds everyone that
> we are not planning to play the autocrats.  But if non-native English
> speakers find the meaning obscure I’m ok without.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Martin
>
>
>
> *From:* internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [
> mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org <internal-cg-bounces at icann.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Kavouss Arasteh
> *Sent:* 29 August 2014 13:32
> *To:* Daniel Karrenberg
> *Cc:* Coordination Group
> *Subject:* Re: [Internal-cg] RFP - publishable draft?
>
>
>
> Dear Alissa,
>
> Dear All,
>
> I suggest some small amendments to make various parts of the text
> consistent with each other
>
> See attachment
>
> Kavouss  the l
>
>
>
> 2014-08-29 13:37 GMT+02:00 Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net>:
>
> On 28.08.14 23:36 , Alissa Cooper wrote:
> > ...
>
> >
> > Are there any objections to publishing this as a draft (and having the
> > secretariat host it on our web site and make an announcement about its
> > existence) by Sept 1?
>
> I support publishing this as a daft with Elise's corrections.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140829/3150b8c5/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list