[Internal-cg] consensus building
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sat Aug 30 12:27:39 UTC 2014
Thank you very much for reply.
I did not ask you to direct any message to any individual.
I did send my comments relating to RFP I repeat RFP two times to every one
but no further development.
In the draft procedure it is mentioned that if views of the minority is
not taken into account they have to discuss that with chairs and Vice chairs
On that approach I asked you to advise why my comments relating to the
Draft RFP that I sent to all as Rev 2 of my comment was not taken into
In the V14 there are legal inconsistencies which should be removed
2014-08-30 12:25 GMT+02:00 Mohamed El Bashir <mbashir at mbash.net>:
> Dear Kavous,
> We encourage you to discuss future document updates and comments in the
> ICG mailing list, in the mailing list all members discuss and express their
> views, the the document editor/focal point is monitoring the discussions
> and comments and he/she will consider the opinions expressed in his/her
> update of the documents.
> We can't as (chairs) direct or instruct document editors/focal points or
> ICG members to accept nor reject specific comments, although as ICG
> (members) individually each one of us are can give their own opinions which
> are expressed in the ICG mailing list as well.
> Have a good weekend
> Kind Regards,
> On 29 Aug 2014, at 15:48, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> Dear All,
> I have sent my comments to that doc. as contained in REV 2 ,as hereby
> attached .
> I sincerely request you to take that into account .I need a clear reply
> from the ICG management Team ob the matter
> <ICG-Consensus Building_draft_v4 + MB (1),REV 2 KA.doc>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg