[Internal-cg] Please review: proposal finalization process

[joseph alhadeff]

Russ:

It's listed as a description requirement under the 4th bullet of IV 
Transition Implications.  It references testing of workability.   I have 
no problem using that language, but I do have a problem ignoring this 
requirement.

It would seem that it benefits operational communities to make such a 
case in trying to assure acceptance.  NTIA has also discussed the 
importance of such elements, though after they finalized the formal 
requirements. 
(http://netchoice.org/ntia-secretary-strickling-supporting-use-cases-stress-tests-iana-transition/)

Best-

Joe

On 12/9/2014 4:02 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
> I reviewed the draft "IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal Assembly and Finalization Process" document.  Nice job.  I agree with the vast majority of the document.
>
> MAJOR CONCERN:
>
> I think we should remove Question C from step 2.  The ICG proposal did not ask the operational communities to report on stress testing or scenario analysis.  I realize that some communities are doing this based on concerns raised within their community, but we did not ask everyone to do it, so we cannot fail to move the proposal forward at this point if it has not been done.
>
> EDITORIAL COMMENTS:
>
> There is a typo in step 4.  The public comment will be similar to that in step 3 (not step 2).  Similarly, the subsequent step is number 5 (not 4)
>
> The "proposal submission" step should be numbered 5 (not 6).
>
> Russ
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg