[Internal-cg] Session(s) in Singapore

[Jari Arkko]

>> And general feedback from the community. 
> 
> One question to consider is whether this becomes a public comment session in which groups strive to alter the proposals. We would need to be clear about the fact that ICG cannot re-design proposals and if we uncover any serious problems the proposals will simply be sent back to the OCs. 

I was mostly thinking about the feedback for the whole rather than the parts, but indeed, you are absolutely right that we need to make the above clear.

Jari

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20141216/5bc95a8a/signature.asc>