[Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
mnuduma at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 14 20:03:33 UTC 2014
The word Multi Stakeholder sounds great to me as it is a characterization of the group's composition. Can we consider the following?
Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Transition - MSCGIT or MCGIT
Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Stewardship - MSCGIS or MCGIS
On Monday, July 14, 2014 7:15 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
I think we're all getting way too cute with this.
CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself.
Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do.
Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM
> To: Narelle Clark
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
> > Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
> I agree. That is pretty good.
> I also liked TSIF.
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg