[Internal-cg] Early draft for a charter

[Daniel Karrenberg]

On 15.07.14 20:53 , WUKnoben wrote:
> I think the group has to be clear about the various consensus levels
> everybody has in mind when talking about "consensus". In addition it
> should be transparent on whose behalf CG members speak and - if at all -
> participate in consensus calls. It could be helpful to mention it in the
> charter.

This is a hard problem in general. In our specific case I would go for
the pragmatic approach: "No outspoken disagreement by anyone NTIA cannot
ignore." This is easy to check if we liaise closely with NTIA.

Daniel