[Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for July 17-18

[Patrik Fältström]

Sigh...there is a "not" too many below:

On 17 jul 2014, at 08:44, Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se> wrote:

> If there is something I do not think this group will have problems with are viewpoints that arrive very very late in the process. Late enough so that many people on the CG do think "but did we not have consensus on that".

Of course I meant to say "If there is something I *DO* think this group will have problems with..."

> One of the most important such issues that could create issues is "scope". If someone disagree with scope, let everyone know *now*.
> 
> I want to see chair(s) of this CG be able to use a "consensus" (for some definition of consensus) view on scope as a tool to be able to move forward in the end-game of this CG.

   Patrik

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140717/9cdbc055/signature.asc>