[Internal-cg] scope language
jon at donuts.co
Thu Jul 17 13:07:06 UTC 2014
I would delete the following clause:
whereas the other process focuses on enhancing the accountability of ICANN’s policy development process.
On Jul 17, 2014, at 9:02 AM, "Drazek, Keith" <kdrazek at verisign.com> wrote:
> I support the language circulated by Milton. I’m also supportive of Paul’s suggestion that we not limit it to accountability alone. I made two suggested edits in blue below:
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Milton L Mueller
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 8:57 AM
> To: internal-cg at icann.org
> Subject: [Internal-cg] scope language
> The IANA stewardship transition process is taking place alongside aparallel and related process on enhancing ICANN accountability. While maintaining the accountability of Internet identifier governance is central to both processes, this group’s scope is limited to filling the accountability gaps created by the end of the NTIA’s role as principal in the IANA contract, whereas the other process focuses on enhancing the accountability of ICANN’s policy development process. Nevertheless, the two processes are interrelated and interdependent and the ICG must assess proposed solutions in the light of the of the other accountability process.
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Internal-cg