[Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Narelle .. Good point that needs to be considered !!
Optimally, sharing agreed stable versions would have been best; but I
just thought that for practical reasons, given the tight timeframes and
that we should be representing our communities views in the group, that
parallel consultation may be necessary ..

Kind Regards
--Manal 

-----Original Message-----
From: Narelle Clark [mailto:narelle.clark at accan.org.au] 
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Manal Ismail; Joseph Alhadeff; daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net;
internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

Manal
Many of us will be consulting widely on topics also discussed here,
therefore I also have an expectation that items will be shared more
broadly.

It also goes hand in hand with the implicit expectation that people will
be correspondingly respectful of the context of the discussion and not
attribute parts inappropriately. It's easy to misattribute, also in an
email chain. Especially when top posting and threading in email is mixed
as it is these days!

Best regards

Narelle


-----Original Message-----
From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:internal-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Monday, 21 July 2014 6:46 PM
To: Joseph Alhadeff; daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

Apologies for the misunderstanding .. Definitely this was not my
intention nor I think was the intention of the reply ..
I may have not chosen the right words .. I did not mean 'approval' per
se .. I should have rather said 'explicit discussion' .. I was just
trying not to depend on assumptions or guesses ..

Kind Regards
--Manal

-----Original Message-----
From: Joseph Alhadeff [mailto:joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 10:35 AM
To: daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net; internal-cg at icann.org; Manal Ismail
Subject: RE: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

Colleagues:  I don't have any issue with the solution proposed, but I do
want to highlight that no single individual on this list can provide an
explicit approval which is the purview of the group...

Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)

-----Original Message-----

From: Manal Ismail [manal at tra.gov.eg]
Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 9:15AM
To: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net];
internal-cg at icann.org [internal-cg at icann.org]
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

Many thanks Daniel ..
This matches my understanding .. I just thought to seek explicit
approval in case I have missed anything as a late comer ..
Kind regards
--Manal 

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Karrenberg [mailto:daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 9:09 AM
To: Manal Ismail; internal-cg at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Information sharing beyond ICG ..

On 21.07.14 9:03 , Manal Ismail wrote:
> Is it ok to share, beyond this group, documents under discussion here
or
> have you agreed to wait for versions approved by this coordination
group
> first ?
> 
>  
> 
> This is a general question for all documents being exchanged, just to 
> make sure I'm not violating any agreed rules by sharing working
documents ..
> 
>  
> 
> Appreciate your advice ..

Manal,

the group decided to have the e-mail archives of this list open to the
public. So anything discussed on the list is for all practical purposes
public.

So personally I would feel totally comfortable with anyone sharing
anything that happens on this list, including documents exchanged here.

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg