[Internal-cg] Participation in ICG - 6 points to reach consensus on
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Thu Jul 24 21:12:03 UTC 2014
> When we need to come to consensus about something, the
> consensus should be among the members, not members+liaisons.
> We can solicit advice and opinions from the liaisons, but they
> should not otherwise be involved in consensus gathering or writing
> the group's output. I think it is inappropriate for people who are
> employed by ICANN or who have fiduciary responsibility to ICANN
> to be otherwise involved in discussions and decisions about the
> future of the oversight of one of the ICANN departments.
Agree, and this is very important.
> Suggestion: We accept the proposal from ICANN to until further
> notice from ICG continue with this set of support staff: Theresa,
> Ergys, Alice, Jim and Hillary.
> Suggestion: We postpone discussion on minutes and otherwise
> record taking of our future meetings to the discussion on the Secretariat.
> Suggestion: Until minutes from first meeting are complete, Sam
> Dickinson should be treated as support staff (together with Theresa,
> Ergys, Alice, Jim and Hillary).
> Suggestion: Alternative D, i.e. all Members, Liaisons and Support Staff get read/write access to our documents.
Not agreed. I would support alternative A only.
This suggestion seems inconsistent with your first suggestion.
More information about the Internal-cg