[Internal-cg] Fwd: CWG to develop an IANA Stewardship Transition proposal on naming related functions and the work of the ICG

[Daniel Karrenberg]

Oops! The second part of this message was intended to go to Kavouss only. I did not intend to make a point of it. 

D


---
Sent from a handheld device.

> On 03.10.2014, at 16:27, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Kavouss, colleagues,
> 
> We have agreed and published a time line. We would be ill advised  to formally discuss revising it before we even have formally heared significant and concrete reasons to revise it and had time to consider them. I have not yet heared any. Therefore I do not support any formal discussion about changing the time line at this point and I caution against a formal discussion of this topic during our upcoming LA meeting. 
> 
> Daniel
> 
> Note well that personally I have spoken against this time line before we agreed it. Consult the minutes of our first f2f meeting for  my reasons. 
> 
> Daniel
> ---
> Sent from a handheld device.