[Internal-cg] Revised Text on Question about ICG and ICANN board

[Demi Getschko]

+1
demi

On 10/21/2014 05:16 PM, Subrenat, Jean-Jacques wrote:
> "does not have community approval" suits me.
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>
> À: "joseph alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>
> Cc: "Jean-Jacques' 'Subrenat" <jjs at dyalog.net>, "internal-cg at icann.org" <internal-cg at icann.org>
> Envoyé: Mardi 21 Octobre 2014 20:31:04
> Objet: RE: [Internal-cg] Revised Text on Question about ICG and ICANN board
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> any way beyond the normal comment process.  You phrasing is in the
>> nature of a statement of legal fact.
> Is it? I don't think so. You read it that way, but I and many others don't. The word "law" or "legal" does not appear in there, and if you look up the ordinary dictionary definition of "authorized" it says
>
> "having official permission or approval."
>
> If you like we can replace the word "authorized" with "does not have community approval"
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg