[Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..

Subrenat, Jean-Jacques jjs at dyalog.net
Sun Oct 26 19:22:58 UTC 2014


Dear Manal,

like Joe, I prefer the sober but accurate formulation you proposed. Thanks.

Jean-Jacques.





----- Mail original -----
De: "mnuduma" <mnuduma at yahoo.com>
À: "Milton L Mueller" <mueller at syr.edu>, "Joseph Alhadeff" <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>, paf at frobbit.se, "elise gerich" <elise.gerich at icann.org>, manal at tra.gov.eg
Cc: internal-cg at icann.org
Envoyé: Dimanche 26 Octobre 2014 19:34:02
Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 ..





+1. 
Mary Uduma 





Sent from Samsung Mobile 


-------- Original message -------- 
From: Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> 
Date: 27/10/2014 01:06 (GMT+09:00) 
To: Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com>,paf at frobbit.se,elise.gerich at icann.org,manal at tra.gov.eg 
Cc: internal-cg at icann.org 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 23Oct14 .. 


I think the best way to say this - simplest and most accurate - is just to delete the word board and say "ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons...." Making a distinction between the board and a IANA liaison is pointless detail that may confuse ordinary readers more than it clarifies. 

> -----Original Message----- 
> From: internal-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- 
> bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Alhadeff 
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 2:30 PM 
> To: paf at frobbit.se; elise.gerich at icann.org; manal at tra.gov.eg 
> Cc: internal-cg at icann.org 
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 
> 23Oct14 .. 
> 
> We really don't need any more detail than that... 
> 
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) 
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> 
> From: Manal Ismail [manal at tra.gov.eg] 
> Received: Saturday, 25 Oct 2014, 2:24PM 
> To: Patrik Fältström [paf at frobbit.se]; Elise Gerich [elise.gerich at icann.org] 
> CC: internal-cg at icann.org [internal-cg at icann.org] 
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 
> 23Oct14 .. 
> 
> Thanks Elise, Hartmut and Patrik .. 
> 
> 
> 
> I had the same understanding too and have reflected this in earlier versions 
> .. Yet I changed the text based on the latest draft shared by Jandyr on behalf 
> of the small drafting group (himself, Lynn & Xiaodong), which I recall was 
> also supported by Jean-Jacques and Milton .. 
> 
> But I see your point and am happy to revert back to the earlier text, which 
> stated: 
> 
> “The Board is represented on the ICG by one liaison. In addition, there is a 
> liaison to the ICG from the IANA Department. Both liaisons are there to 
> provide information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and ICG 
> informed about the implications of the transition.” 
> 
> 
> 
> Is this ok? Should I also add the names ? 
> 
> 
> 
> Kind Regards 
> 
> --Manal 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Patrik Fältström [mailto:paf at frobbit.se] 
> Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2014 6:06 PM 
> To: Elise Gerich 
> Cc: Manal Ismail; internal-cg at icann.org 
> Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 
> 23Oct14 .. 
> 
> 
> 
> I support this. 
> 
> 
> 
> Patrik 
> 
> 
> 
> On 25 okt 2014, at 17:13, Elise Gerich <elise.gerich at icann.org> 
> wrote: 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear Manal, 
> 
> 
> 
> I thought the discussion on list had indicated that it is more accurate 
> to say, ICANN is represented on the ICG by two liaisons rather than The 
> Board is represented on the ICG by two liaisons. Kuo-Wei Wu is the Boards 
> liaison to the ICG, and my role is a liaison from the ICANNs IANA department. 
> My participation on the committee is not as a representative of the ICANN 
> Board. 
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards, 
> 
> -- Elise 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg <mailto:manal at tra.gov.eg> 
> > 
> Date: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 11:48 PM 
> To: "internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org> " 
> <internal-cg at icann.org <mailto:internal-cg at icann.org> > 
> Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG FAQ - reflecting comments received until 
> 23Oct14 .. 
> 
> 
> 
> Dear all .. 
> 
> Please find attached, and in Dropbox, a new version of ICG 
> FAQ reflecting the latest views and comments shared .. I have also attached 
> below the final compilation of answers to Q#15 & Q#16 for your convenience 
> .. Kindly note that I took the liberty to change "ICG proposal" or "ICG's 
> proposal" to "proposal submitted by the ICG", to avoid being misunderstood 
> as attributing the community's proposal solely to the ICG .. Hope this is ok 
> with everyone .. 
> 
> Happy to receive any further remarks or comments .. 
> 
> Kind Regards 
> 
> --Manal 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> 15. What is the role of the ICANN Board in preparing the 
> proposal? 
> 
> The ICG is independent of the ICANN Board. The Board is 
> represented on the ICG by two liaisons (Mrs. Elise Gerich, IANA Staff Expert; 
> and Mr. Kuo-Wei Wu, ICANN Board Liaison), who are there to provide 
> information about the IANA functions and to keep the Board and the ICG 
> informed about the implications of the transition. Like any other member of 
> the community, the ICANN Board can submit comments through the 
> established procedures for public comment. Consistent with U.S. federal 
> government procurement rules, the NTIA needs to have the final proposal 
> submitted to it by the ICANN Board, but the Board does not have community 
> approval to modify the proposal submitted by the ICG. When the ICG 
> submits the final proposal to ICANN, it will also be released to the general 
> public and to NTIA as well. 
> 
> 16. How will ICANN Board handle the final proposal 
> submitted by the ICG? 
> 
> The ICG expects that the final proposal, having achieved 
> consensus on the Coordination Group and within the Operational 
> Communities, will be welcomed by the ICANN Board and dutifully 
> transmitted to NTIA. 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Internal-cg mailing list 
> Internal-cg at icann.org 
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Internal-cg mailing list 
> Internal-cg at icann.org 
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 
_______________________________________________ 
Internal-cg mailing list 
Internal-cg at icann.org 
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg 

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list