[Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for meeting on Sep 6

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Mon Sep 1 22:39:10 UTC 2014


I’m fine with your agenda and Manal’s addition. I also agree to keeping an eye to best clustering.

Re community updates: do you refer to those “communities” listed in the ICG members list?

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich



From: Patrik Fältström 
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2014 11:40 PM
To: Kavouss Arasteh 
Cc: Coordination Group 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Proposed agenda for meeting on Sep 6

Dear Kavouss, 

Regarding your proposals. The schedule of events is part of the timeline, and I interpret your suggestion regarding "ICANN Enhanced Accountability Process" being what Manal already proposed.

Regarding your request for confirmation for for example the three chair/vice-chair positions not bee needed, as we neither as you say had 100% voting, nor will we have 100% participation at this meeting. We will never have 100% participation in any kind of participation. And that is why I personally am extremely careful of in a context like ICG (or similar to it) talk about a certain percentage be needed to reach a conclusion.

If we have consensus, within an announced timeline, then we have reached a conclusion.

The rest are implementation details.

   Patrik

On 1 sep 2014, at 21:07, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:


  Dear Patrik
  Yes I also agree with Manal .In addition we need to examine the relation between the Enhanced ICANN Accountability and activities of ICG as referred to in the Charter 
  I have made some suggestions .I have made some changes as attached
  KAVOUSS 



  2014-09-01 17:45 GMT+02:00 Patrik Fältström <paf at frobbit.se>:

    Joseph, 

    Thanks for the suggestion. Let me think about this. It is important we cluster things the right way so that we also at the same time have time to actually walk through the full agenda. Clusters makes us save time.

       Patrik

    On 1 sep 2014, at 14:50, joseph alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com> wrote:


      The only question I would have is should we move the consensus process document to be closer to the RFP discussion...

      On 9/1/2014 7:15 AM, Patrik Fältström wrote:

All,

Attached is a proposed agenda for the meeting on September 6.

Please come back with feedback on this list.

   Regards, Patrik Fältström


         


         

_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg


      _______________________________________________
      Internal-cg mailing list
      Internal-cg at icann.org
      https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg



    _______________________________________________
    Internal-cg mailing list
    Internal-cg at icann.org
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg



  <Draft Agenda ICG meeting Istanbul,patrik revised by KA.doc><Draft Agenda ICG meeting Istanbul,patrik revised by KA.doc>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140902/8bbe472b/attachment.html>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list