[Internal-cg] consensus building

Alissa Cooper alissa at cooperw.in
Wed Sep 3 10:31:19 UTC 2014


v5 is attached. I would send the dropbox link but I’m having dropbox
connectivity problems.

On 9/3/14, 1:28 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Friend
> I do not know what is in version 5
> Pls look at the attached doc.
> KAVOUSS 
> 
> 
> 2014-09-03 12:23 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>> On 9/3/14, 1:10 PM, "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I do not know what we are dealing here
>> 
>> I was commenting on v5 circulated by Wolf-Ulrich. That version has text in it
>> that I find problematic, as indicated in my email. The v4 version you
>> circulated does not contain that language. As I will not be present on Sept
>> 6, I’m trying to get my comments to the mailing list in advance of the
>> meeting.
>> 
>> Alissa
>> 
>>> Please kindly read my doc on consensus building sent to you last night
>>> Vrsion 4 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2014-09-03 10:28 GMT+02:00 Alissa Cooper <alissa at cooperw.in>:
>>>> Wolf-Ulrich,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for your work on this.
>>>> 
>>>> On 9/2/14, 1:19 AM, "WUKnoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >* “small minority”: should further be discussed. I added
>>>>> >  the condition that a recommendation is not reached if at least one of
>>>>> >the ICG
>>>>> >  communities (according to the list) as a whole is firmly and formally
>>>>> >opposed.
>>>>> >  That would mean a formal written objection by the community leadership
>>>>> >on
>>>>> >  behalf of their community.
>>>>> >
>>>> 
>>>> I’m not sure this matches what was being discussed on the list. If we use
>>>> the text Martin had suggested, I think the third bullet under section 4(b)
>>>> should read:
>>>> 
>>>> "After enough time has passed for the ICG to consider and attempt to
>>>> accommodate objections, the ICG can reach a conclusion if at most a small
>>>> minority disagrees and their objections have been documented.  It is not
>>>> expected that the representatives of an operational community
>>>> significantly and directly affected by a conclusion would be overruled in
>>>> this process.”
>>>> 
>>>> Alissa
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Internal-cg mailing list
>>>> Internal-cg at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>>> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/9d528041/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICG-Consensus Building_draft_v5.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 80384 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140903/9d528041/ICG-ConsensusBuilding_draft_v5.doc>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list